These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27513789)

  • 1. Adult distal radius fractures classification systems: essential clinical knowledge or abstract memory testing?
    Shehovych A; Salar O; Meyer C; Ford DJ
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2016 Nov; 98(8):525-531. PubMed ID: 27513789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Do 3-D Printed Handheld Models Improve Surgeon Reliability for Recognition of Intraarticular Distal Radius Fracture Characteristics?
    Langerhuizen DWG; Doornberg JN; Janssen MMA; Kerkhoffs GMMJ; Jaarsma RL; Janssen SJ
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2020 Dec; 478(12):2901-2908. PubMed ID: 32667759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Is it time to revisit the AO classification of fractures of the distal radius? Inter- and intra-observer reliability of the AO classification.
    Plant CE; Hickson C; Hedley H; Parsons NR; Costa ML
    Bone Joint J; 2015 Jun; 97-B(6):818-23. PubMed ID: 26033063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Are distal radius fracture classifications reproducible? Intra and interobserver agreement.
    Belloti JC; Tamaoki MJ; Franciozi CE; Santos JB; Balbachevsky D; Chap Chap E; Albertoni WM; Faloppa F
    Sao Paulo Med J; 2008 May; 126(3):180-5. PubMed ID: 18711658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Classification of distal radius fractures in children: good inter- and intraobserver reliability, which improves with clinical experience.
    Randsborg PH; Sivertsen EA
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2012 Jan; 13():6. PubMed ID: 22269925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Consistency of AO fracture classification for the distal radius.
    Kreder HJ; Hanel DP; McKee M; Jupiter J; McGillivary G; Swiontkowski MF
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 1996 Sep; 78(5):726-31. PubMed ID: 8836058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [The MEU classification system for distal radius fractures: Prognostic and therapeutic value of an independent assessment of various fracture parameters].
    Laulan J; Marteau E; Bacle G
    Hand Surg Rehabil; 2016 Dec; 35S():S28-S33. PubMed ID: 27890207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Distal radius fractures are difficult to classify.
    Wæver D; Madsen ML; Rölfing JHD; Borris LC; Henriksen M; Nagel LL; Thorninger R
    Injury; 2018 Jun; 49 Suppl 1():S29-S32. PubMed ID: 29929689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Distal radius fractures: Which classification is the right one?].
    Obert L; Lepage D; Saadnia R; Mille F; Rey PB; Loisel F
    Hand Surg Rehabil; 2016 Dec; 35S():S24-S27. PubMed ID: 27890206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Classifying fractures of the distal radius: impossible or unnecessary? Review of the literature and proposal of a grouping system.
    Xarchas KC; Verettas DA; Kazakos KJ
    Med Sci Monit; 2009 Mar; 15(3):RA67-74. PubMed ID: 19247259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Interobserver reliability and intraobserver reproducibility of the Fernandez classification for distal radius fractures.
    Naqvi SG; Reynolds T; Kitsis C
    J Hand Surg Eur Vol; 2009 Aug; 34(4):483-5. PubMed ID: 19321533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A retrospective evaluation of reliability and reproducibility of Arbeitsgemeinschaftfür Osteosynthesefragen classification and Fernandez classification for distal radius fracture.
    Yinjie Y; Gen W; Hongbo W; Chongqing X; Fan Z; Yanqi F; Xuequn W; Wen M
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2020 Jan; 99(2):e18508. PubMed ID: 31914022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Overview of the classification of distal radius fracture].
    Zhao Y; Cui XR; Wang L; Yan A
    Zhongguo Gu Shang; 2008 Oct; 21(10):800-2. PubMed ID: 19105393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of the reliability of classification systems used for distal radius fractures.
    Kural C; Sungur I; Kaya I; Ugras A; Ertürk A; Cetinus E
    Orthopedics; 2010 Nov; 33(11):801. PubMed ID: 21053882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the cooney classification of distal radius fractures between experienced orthopaedic surgeons.
    Jin WJ; Jiang LS; Shen L; Lu H; Cui YM; Zhou Q; Dai LY
    J Hand Surg Eur Vol; 2007 Oct; 32(5):509-11. PubMed ID: 17950210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The comparative study of reliability and reproducibility of distal radius' fracture classification among: AO frykman and Fernandez classification systems.
    Siripakarn Y; Niempoog S; Boontanapibul K
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2013 Jan; 96(1):52-7. PubMed ID: 23720978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Distal radius fracture: the rationale of a classification.
    Fernandez DL
    Chir Main; 2001 Dec; 20(6):411-25. PubMed ID: 11778328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Classification of distal radius fractures: an analysis of interobserver reliability and intraobserver reproducibility.
    Andersen DJ; Blair WF; Steyers CM; Adams BD; el-Khouri GY; Brandser EA
    J Hand Surg Am; 1996 Jul; 21(4):574-82. PubMed ID: 8842946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Distal radius fractures--classification of treatment and indications for surgery.
    Ilyas AM; Jupiter JB
    Orthop Clin North Am; 2007 Apr; 38(2):167-73, v. PubMed ID: 17560399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Higher Mortality in Men Compared with Women following Distal Radius Fracture in Population Aged 50 Years or Above: Are Common Distal Radius Fracture Classifications Useful in Predicting Mortality?
    Marchewka J; Głodzik J; Marchewka W; Golec E
    Biomed Res Int; 2019; 2019():5359204. PubMed ID: 30809543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.