771 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27514161)
1. [COMPARISON OF LAPAROSCOPIC ASSISTED VAGINAL HYSTERECTOMY AND VAGINAL HYSTERECTOMY FOR BENIGN DISEASES AND LESIONS OF THE FEMALE GENITAL SYSTEM].
Kovachev S; Ganovska A; Stankova T
Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2016; 55 Suppl 1 Pt 1():4-10. PubMed ID: 27514161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Randomized comparison of total laparoscopic, laparoscopically assisted vaginal and vaginal hysterectomies for myomatous uteri.
Sesti F; Cosi V; Calonzi F; Ruggeri V; Pietropolli A; Di Francesco L; Piccione E
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2014 Sep; 290(3):485-91. PubMed ID: 24710800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A prospective randomized comparison of vaginal hysterectomy, laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy, and total laparoscopic hysterectomy in women with benign uterine disease.
Drahonovsky J; Haakova L; Otcenasek M; Krofta L; Kucera E; Feyereisl J
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2010 Feb; 148(2):172-6. PubMed ID: 19926201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The impact of obesity on vaginal hysterectomy and laparoscopically-assisted vaginal hysterectomy outcomes: A randomised control trial.
Locher JA; Chrysostomou M; Djokovic D; Libhaber E; van Herendael BJ; Chrysostomou A
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2023 Aug; 287():227-231. PubMed ID: 37390756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Gasless single-port laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy for large uteri weighing 500g or more.
Takeda A; Hayashi S; Imoto S; Nakamura H
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Aug; 203():239-44. PubMed ID: 27352286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Vaginal hysterectomy versus laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy for large uteri between 280 and 700 g: a randomized controlled trial.
Mohammed WE; Salama F; Tharwat A; Mohamed I; ElMaraghy A
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2017 Jul; 296(1):77-83. PubMed ID: 28508344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus vaginal hysterectomy for benign uterine diseases: a prospective, randomized, multicenter, double-blind trial (LAVA).
Eggemann H; Ignatov A; Frauchiger-Heuer H; Amse T; Costa SD
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2018 Feb; 297(2):479-485. PubMed ID: 29302807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A randomized control trial comparing vaginal and laparoscopically-assisted vaginal hysterectomy in the absence of uterine prolapse in a South African tertiary institution.
Chrysostomou A; Djokovic D; Libhaber E; Edridge W; Kawonga M; van Herendael BJ
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2021 Dec; 267():73-78. PubMed ID: 34731640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of total laparoscopic, vaginal and abdominal hysterectomy.
Schindlbeck C; Klauser K; Dian D; Janni W; Friese K
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2008 Apr; 277(4):331-7. PubMed ID: 17938945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparative study between laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy and abdominal hysterectomy.
Jaturasrivilai P
J Med Assoc Thai; 2007 May; 90(5):837-43. PubMed ID: 17596034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of vaginal, laparoscopic-assisted vaginal, and minilaparotomy hysterectomies for enlarged myomatous uteri.
Sesti F; Calonzi F; Ruggeri V; Pietropolli A; Piccione E
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2008 Dec; 103(3):227-31. PubMed ID: 18771766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy with and without laparoscopic transsection of the uterine artery: an analysis of 1,255 cases.
Kavallaris A; Kalogiannidis I; Chalvatzas N; Hornemann A; Beyer D; Georgiev I; Herrmann J; Camara O; Altgassen C; Diedrich K
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2011 Aug; 284(2):379-84. PubMed ID: 20830481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Surgical routes and complications of hysterectomy for benign disorders: a prospective observational study in French university hospitals.
David-Montefiore E; Rouzier R; Chapron C; Daraï E;
Hum Reprod; 2007 Jan; 22(1):260-5. PubMed ID: 16950826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery-assisted versus single-port laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy: a case-matched study.
Yang YS; Kim SY; Hur MH; Oh KY
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(4):624-31. PubMed ID: 24462594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy vs vaginal hysterectomy: meta analysis.
Guo Y; Tian X; Wang L
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2013; 20(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 23312242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Operative approaches, indications, and medical economics evaluation of 4180 cases of hysterectomy].
Tan XJ; Lang JH; Shen K; Liu ZF; Sun DW; Leng JH; Zhu L
Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 2003 Aug; 25(4):406-9. PubMed ID: 12974083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Total abdominal hysterectomy versus laparoscopically-assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus total vaginal hysterectomy.
Shiota M; Kotani Y; Umemoto M; Tobiume T; Shimaoka M; Hoshiai H
Asian J Endosc Surg; 2011 Nov; 4(4):161-5. PubMed ID: 22776300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Laparoscopic coagulation of the uterine blood supply in laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy is associated with less blood loss.
Köhler C; Hasenbein K; Klemm P; Tozzi R; Michels W; Schneider A
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2004; 25(4):453-6. PubMed ID: 15285302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A prospective randomised study of total laparoscopic hysterectomy, laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy and non-descent vaginal hysterectomy for the treatment of benign diseases of the uterus.
Roy KK; Goyal M; Singla S; Sharma JB; Malhotra N; Kumar S
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2011 Oct; 284(4):907-12. PubMed ID: 21140160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A Randomized Comparison of Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Hysterectomies: Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy Versus Laparoscopically Assisted Vaginal Hysterectomy.
Song T; Kim MK; Kim ML; Jung YW; Yun BS; Seong SJ
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2015 Jul; 25(7):541-7. PubMed ID: 26075931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
