88 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27514311)
1. Comparative study of different histologic classifications in the degree of differentiation in endometrial adenocarcinoma.
Silva-Filho AL; Xavier ÉB; Cândido EB; Macarenco R; Ferreira MC; Xavier MA; Maciel RA; Vidigal PV
Tumori; 2016 Oct; 102(5):488-495. PubMed ID: 27514311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prognostic significance and interobserver variability of histologic grading systems for endometrial carcinoma.
Scholten AN; Smit VT; Beerman H; van Putten WL; Creutzberg CL
Cancer; 2004 Feb; 100(4):764-72. PubMed ID: 14770433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A binary architectural grading system for uterine endometrial endometrioid carcinoma has superior reproducibility compared with FIGO grading and identifies subsets of advance-stage tumors with favorable and unfavorable prognosis.
Lax SF; Kurman RJ; Pizer ES; Wu L; Ronnett BM
Am J Surg Pathol; 2000 Sep; 24(9):1201-8. PubMed ID: 10976693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prognosis and reproducibility of new and existing binary grading systems for endometrial carcinoma compared to FIGO grading in hysterectomy specimens.
Guan H; Semaan A; Bandyopadhyay S; Arabi H; Feng J; Fathallah L; Pansare V; Qazi A; Abdul-Karim F; Morris RT; Munkarah AR; Ali-Fehmi R
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2011 May; 21(4):654-60. PubMed ID: 21543931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prognostic value of the 2009 FIGO staging for endometrial cancer: an illustration of the E3N cohort.
Koskas M; Chabbert-Buffet N; Bendifallah S; Luton D; Clavel-Chapelon F; Rouzier R
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2012 Mar; 22(3):447-51. PubMed ID: 22367322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A Cell Type Independent Binary Grading System Does Not Significantly Improve Endometrial Biopsy Interpretation.
Nastic D; Kahlin F; Dahlstrand H; Carlson JW
Int J Gynecol Pathol; 2016 May; 35(3):256-63. PubMed ID: 26863477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The comparison of the agreement in determining the histological grade of uterine endometrial endometrioid carcinoma, using the three-grade FIGO classification and the two-grade system.
Demczuk S; Wierzchowski W; Szczepański W; Dyduch G; Czopek J; Stachura J
Pol J Pathol; 2003; 54(3):179-81. PubMed ID: 14703284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Significant variation in the assessment of cervical involvement in endometrial carcinoma: an interobserver variation study.
McCluggage WG; Hirschowitz L; Wilson GE; Oliva E; Soslow RA; Zaino RJ
Am J Surg Pathol; 2011 Feb; 35(2):289-94. PubMed ID: 21263250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Genomic Heterogeneity of FIGO Grade 3 Endometrioid Carcinoma Impacts Diagnostic Accuracy and Reproducibility.
Hussein YR; Broaddus R; Weigelt B; Levine DA; Soslow RA
Int J Gynecol Pathol; 2016 Jan; 35(1):16-24. PubMed ID: 26166718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of the reproducibility of the revised 1988 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics grading system of endometrial cancers with special emphasis on nuclear grading.
Nielsen AL; Thomsen HK; Nyholm HC
Cancer; 1991 Nov; 68(10):2303-9. PubMed ID: 1913466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Impact of 2009 FIGO staging system on the diagnostic value of preoperative MRI staging of endometrial carcinoma].
Yu XD; Ouyang H; Lin M; Zhou CW; Zhang R
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2011 Sep; 33(9):692-6. PubMed ID: 22340052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The reproducibility of histological parameters employed in the novel binary grading systems of endometrial cancer.
Gemer O; Uriev L; Voldarsky M; Gdalevich M; Ben-Dor D; Barak F; Anteby EY; Lavie O
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2009 Mar; 35(3):247-51. PubMed ID: 18775628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Interobserver Variability in the Diagnosis of Uterine High-Grade Endometrioid Carcinoma.
Thomas S; Hussein Y; Bandyopadhyay S; Cote M; Hassan O; Abdulfatah E; Alosh B; Guan H; Soslow RA; Ali-Fehmi R
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2016 Aug; 140(8):836-43. PubMed ID: 27139150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Validation of the histologic grading for ovarian clear cell adenocarcinoma: a retrospective multi-institutional study by the Japan Clear Cell Carcinoma Study Group.
Yamamoto S; Kasajima A; Takano M; Yaegashi N; Fujiwara H; Kuzuya K; Kigawa J; Tsuda H; Kurachi H; Kikuchi Y; Sugiyama T; Tsuda H; Moriya T
Int J Gynecol Pathol; 2011 Mar; 30(2):129-38. PubMed ID: 21293288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The reproducibility of a binary tumor grading system for uterine endometrial endometrioid carcinoma, compared with FIGO system and nuclear grading.
Sagae S; Saito T; Satoh M; Ikeda T; Kimura S; Mori M; Sato N; Kudo R
Oncology; 2004; 67(5-6):344-50. PubMed ID: 15713989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of prognosis in patients with endometrioid endometrial cancer staged IB in FIGO 1988 and 2009 classifications.
Gottwald L; Moszynska-Zielińska M; Spych M; Korczynski J; Tylinski W; Szwalski J; Kubiak R; Pasz-Walczak G; Sobotkowski J; Suzin J; Piekarski J
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Oct; 286(4):995-1000. PubMed ID: 22627994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Determining the inter- and intraobserver reproducibility of the diagnosis of endometrial hyperplasia subgroups and well-differentiated endometrioid carcinoma in endometrial curettage specimens.
Izadi-Mood N; Khaniki M; Irvanloo G; Ahmadi SA; Hayeri H; Meysamie A
Arch Iran Med; 2009 Jul; 12(4):377-82. PubMed ID: 19566355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. FIGO staging of endometrial adenocarcinoma: a critical review and proposal.
Zaino RJ
Int J Gynecol Pathol; 2009 Jan; 28(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 19047915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of FIGO 1989 and 2009 recommendations on staging of endometrial carcinoma: pathologic analysis and cervical status in 123 consecutive cases.
Korczynski J; Jesionek-Kupnicka D; Gottwald L; Piekarski J
Int J Gynecol Pathol; 2011 Jul; 30(4):328-34. PubMed ID: 21623209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Update on pathology, staging and molecular pathology of endometrial (uterine corpus) adenocarcinoma.
Rutgers JK
Future Oncol; 2015; 11(23):3207-18. PubMed ID: 26551559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
