256 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27515060)
21. The efficacy of the pipelle endometrial biopsy in detecting endometrial carcinoma.
Ferry J; Farnsworth A; Webster M; Wren B
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 1993 Feb; 33(1):76-8. PubMed ID: 8498946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A comparison of the Pipelle device and the Vabra aspirator as measured by endometrial denudation in hysterectomy specimens: the Pipelle device samples significantly less of the endometrial surface than the Vabra aspirator.
Rodriguez GC; Yaqub N; King ME
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Jan; 168(1 Pt 1):55-9. PubMed ID: 8420348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. ES Sampler, a minimally invasive endometrial sampling tool that obtains specimens suitable for both cytological and histological analysis.
Zhang Y; Zhao Y; Lang JH; Li Y
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2021 May; 47(5):1854-1861. PubMed ID: 33590599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Risks and benefits of hysteroscopy and endometrial sampling as a standard procedure for assessing serendipitous findings of endometrial thickening in postmenopausal women.
Aston B; Weaver E
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2014 Dec; 54(6):597-9. PubMed ID: 25308710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Preoperative sampling in endometrial cancer: evaluation of the histopathological agreement with definitive surgical specimen.
Quintana-Bertó R; Padilla-Iserte P; Gil-Moreno A; Oliver-Pérez R; Coronado PJ; Martín-Salamanca MB; Pantoja-Garrido M; Lorenzo C; Beric D; Gilabert-Estellés J; Sánchez L; Roldán-Rivas F; Díaz-Feijoo B; Rodríguez-Hernández JR; Marcos-Sanmartin J; Muruzábal JC; Cañada A; Domingo S;
Clin Transl Oncol; 2022 Dec; 24(12):2388-2394. PubMed ID: 35984612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Endometrial hyperplasia - the dilemma of management remains: a retrospective observational study of 280 women.
Daud S; Jalil SS; Griffin M; Ewies AA
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2011 Nov; 159(1):172-5. PubMed ID: 21764501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The Vabra aspirator versus the Pipelle device for outpatient endometrial sampling.
Naim NM; Mahdy ZA; Ahmad S; Razi ZR
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2007 Apr; 47(2):132-6. PubMed ID: 17355303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Vabra aspirator and pipelle endometrial suction curette. A comparison.
Manganiello PD; Burrows LJ; Dain BJ; Gonzalez J
J Reprod Med; 1998 Oct; 43(10):889-92. PubMed ID: 9800672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Endometrial aspiration cytology by various techniques.
Hemalatha AN; Pai MR; Raghuveer CV
J Indian Med Assoc; 2011 Jun; 109(6):426-7. PubMed ID: 22315775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [The diagnostic value of dilatation and curettage in endometrial carcinoma].
Tiufekchieva E; Slavchev B; Maĭnkhard K
Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 1998; 37(2):33-6. PubMed ID: 9859534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Endometrial brush biopsy. An accurate outpatient method of detecting endometrial malignancy.
Wu HH; Casto BD; Elsheikh TM
J Reprod Med; 2003 Jan; 48(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 12611094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparison of endometrial aspiration biopsy techniques: specimen adequacy.
Sierecki AR; Gudipudi DK; Montemarano N; Del Priore G
J Reprod Med; 2008 Oct; 53(10):760-4. PubMed ID: 19004401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Pipelle endometrial sampling. Sensitivity in the detection of endometrial cancer.
Guido RS; Kanbour-Shakir A; Rulin MC; Christopherson WA
J Reprod Med; 1995 Aug; 40(8):553-5. PubMed ID: 7473450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Uterobrush method in the detection of endometrial pathology.
Iavazzo C; Vorgias G; Mastorakos G; Stefanatou G; Panoussi A; Alexiadou A; Plyta S; Lekka C; Kalinoglou N; Dertimas V; Akrivos T; Fotiou S
Anticancer Res; 2011 Oct; 31(10):3469-74. PubMed ID: 21965763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. How accurate is Pipelle sampling: a study by Huang et al.
Mutch DG; Powell MA; Allsworth JE; Taylor NP; Brooks RA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Mar; 196(3):280-1. PubMed ID: 17346555
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. [Influence of sampling satisfaction using endometrial sampling device and related factors for pathology diagnostic accordance rate].
Zhang T; Zhou R; Liu C; Shen D
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2014 Sep; 49(9):655-8. PubMed ID: 25487450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The role of Pipelle Mark II sampling in endometrial disease diagnosis.
Polena V; Mergui JL; Zerat L; Sananes S
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2007 Oct; 134(2):233-7. PubMed ID: 17029754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Outpatient endometrial biopsy: the pipelle.
Youssif SN; McMillan DL
Br J Hosp Med; 1995 Sep 6-19; 54(5):198-201. PubMed ID: 8528525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The accuracy of endometrial Pipelle sampling with and without sonographic measurement of endometrial thickness.
Goldchmit R; Katz Z; Blickstein I; Caspi B; Dgani R
Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Nov; 82(5):727-30. PubMed ID: 8414316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Uterine cancer screening by the family physician.
Boone MI; Calvert JC; Gates HS
Am Fam Physician; 1984 Nov; 30(5):157-66. PubMed ID: 6437199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
