These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
260 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27515441)
1. A rigid thorax assumption affects model loading predictions at the upper but not lower lumbar levels. Ignasiak D; Ferguson SJ; Arjmand N J Biomech; 2016 Sep; 49(13):3074-3078. PubMed ID: 27515441 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Thoracolumbar spine loading associated with kinematics of the young and the elderly during activities of daily living. Ignasiak D; Rüeger A; Sperr R; Ferguson SJ J Biomech; 2018 Mar; 70():175-184. PubMed ID: 29248192 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Trunk active response and spinal forces in sudden forward loading: analysis of the role of perturbation load and pre-perturbation conditions by a kinematics-driven model. Shahvarpour A; Shirazi-Adl A; Larivière C; Bazrgari B J Biomech; 2015 Jan; 48(1):44-52. PubMed ID: 25476501 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Thoracolumbar spine model with articulated ribcage for the prediction of dynamic spinal loading. Ignasiak D; Dendorfer S; Ferguson SJ J Biomech; 2016 Apr; 49(6):959-966. PubMed ID: 26684431 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Subject-specific 2D/3D image registration and kinematics-driven musculoskeletal model of the spine. Eskandari AH; Arjmand N; Shirazi-Adl A; Farahmand F J Biomech; 2017 May; 57():18-26. PubMed ID: 28365064 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Influence of spinal disc translational stiffness on the lumbar spinal loads, ligament forces and trunk muscle forces during upper body inclination. Arshad R; Zander T; Bashkuev M; Schmidt H Med Eng Phys; 2017 Aug; 46():54-62. PubMed ID: 28666589 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Implementation of physiological functional spinal units in a rigid-body model of the thoracolumbar spine. Wang W; Wang D; De Groote F; Scheys L; Jonkers I J Biomech; 2020 Jan; 98():109437. PubMed ID: 31679758 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Load-sharing in the lumbosacral spine in neutral standing & flexed postures - A combined finite element and inverse static study. Liu T; Khalaf K; Naserkhaki S; El-Rich M J Biomech; 2018 Mar; 70():43-50. PubMed ID: 29153706 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Combination of finite element modeling and optimization for the study of lumbar spine biomechanics considering the 3D thorax-pelvis orientation. Ezquerro F; Simón A; Prado M; Pérez A Med Eng Phys; 2004 Jan; 26(1):11-22. PubMed ID: 14644594 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Torso flexion loads and the fatigue failure of human lumbosacral motion segments. Gallagher S; Marras WS; Litsky AS; Burr D Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Oct; 30(20):2265-73. PubMed ID: 16227888 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An optimization-based method for prediction of lumbar spine segmental kinematics from the measurements of thorax and pelvic kinematics. Shojaei I; Arjmand N; Bazrgari B Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2015 Dec; 31(12):. PubMed ID: 26037214 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Trunk muscle activation and associated lumbar spine joint shear forces under different levels of external forward force applied to the trunk. Kingma I; Staudenmann D; van Dieën JH J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2007 Feb; 17(1):14-24. PubMed ID: 16531071 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of trunk muscle forces and spinal loads estimated by two biomechanical models. Arjmand N; Gagnon D; Plamondon A; Shirazi-Adl A; Larivière C Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2009 Aug; 24(7):533-41. PubMed ID: 19493597 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A combined passive and active musculoskeletal model study to estimate L4-L5 load sharing. Azari F; Arjmand N; Shirazi-Adl A; Rahimi-Moghaddam T J Biomech; 2018 Mar; 70():157-165. PubMed ID: 28527584 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Corrective sitting strategies: An examination of muscle activity and spine loading. Castanharo R; Duarte M; McGill S J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2014 Feb; 24(1):114-9. PubMed ID: 24295543 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of the effects of bilateral posterior dynamic and rigid fixation devices on the loads in the lumbar spine: a finite element analysis. Rohlmann A; Burra NK; Zander T; Bergmann G Eur Spine J; 2007 Aug; 16(8):1223-31. PubMed ID: 17206401 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Biomechanics of changes in lumbar posture in static lifting. Arjmand N; Shirazi-Adl A Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Dec; 30(23):2637-48. PubMed ID: 16319750 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of lumbo-pelvic rhythm on trunk muscle forces and disc loads during forward flexion: A combined musculoskeletal and finite element simulation study. Liu T; Khalaf K; Adeeb S; El-Rich M J Biomech; 2019 Jan; 82():116-123. PubMed ID: 30389260 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]