293 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27516357)
1. Apparent diffusion coefficient measurements in diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of the anterior mediastinum: inter-observer reproducibility of five different methods of region-of-interest positioning.
Priola AM; Priola SM; Parlatano D; Gned D; Giraudo MT; Giardino R; Ferrero B; Ardissone F; Veltri A
Eur Radiol; 2017 Apr; 27(4):1386-1394. PubMed ID: 27516357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Diffusion-weighted quantitative MRI of pleural abnormalities: Intra- and interobserver variability in the apparent diffusion coefficient measurements.
Priola AM; Priola SM; Gned D; Giraudo MT; Brundu M; Righi L; Veltri A
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Sep; 46(3):769-782. PubMed ID: 28117923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reduced Field-of-View Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Histological Characterization of Rectal Cancer: Impact of Different Region-of-Interest Positioning Protocols on Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Measurements.
Peng Y; Xu C; Hu X; Shen Y; Hu D; Kamel I; Li Z
Eur J Radiol; 2020 Jun; 127():109028. PubMed ID: 32361587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Interobserver variability of selective region-of-interest measurement protocols for quantitative diffusion weighted imaging in soft tissue masses: Comparison with whole tumor volume measurements.
Ahlawat S; Khandheria P; Del Grande F; Morelli J; Subhawong TK; Demehri S; Fayad LM
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Feb; 43(2):446-54. PubMed ID: 26174705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Diffusion Weighted Imaging for Differentiating Benign from Malignant Orbital Tumors: Diagnostic Performance of the Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Based on Region of Interest Selection Method.
Xu XQ; Hu H; Su GY; Liu H; Shi HB; Wu FY
Korean J Radiol; 2016; 17(5):650-6. PubMed ID: 27587953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessment and quantification of sources of variability in breast apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurements at diffusion weighted imaging.
Giannotti E; Waugh S; Priba L; Davis Z; Crowe E; Vinnicombe S
Eur J Radiol; 2015 Sep; 84(9):1729-36. PubMed ID: 26078100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Diffusion-weighted imaging of breast lesions: Region-of-interest placement and different ADC parameters influence apparent diffusion coefficient values.
Bickel H; Pinker K; Polanec S; Magometschnigg H; Wengert G; Spick C; Bogner W; Bago-Horvath Z; Helbich TH; Baltzer P
Eur Radiol; 2017 May; 27(5):1883-1892. PubMed ID: 27578047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurements in pancreatic adenocarcinoma: A preliminary study of the effect of region of interest on ADC values and interobserver variability.
Ma C; Liu L; Li J; Wang L; Chen LG; Zhang Y; Chen SY; Lu JP
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Feb; 43(2):407-13. PubMed ID: 26182908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Apparent diffusion coefficient measurement in glioma: Influence of region-of-interest determination methods on apparent diffusion coefficient values, interobserver variability, time efficiency, and diagnostic ability.
Han X; Suo S; Sun Y; Zu J; Qu J; Zhou Y; Chen Z; Xu J
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Mar; 45(3):722-730. PubMed ID: 27527072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in the characterization of testicular germ cell neoplasms: Effect of ROI methods on apparent diffusion coefficient values and interobserver variability.
Tsili AC; Ntorkou A; Astrakas L; Xydis V; Tsampalas S; Sofikitis N; Argyropoulou MI
Eur J Radiol; 2017 Apr; 89():1-6. PubMed ID: 28267523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurement in endometrial carcinoma: effect of region of interest methods on ADC values.
Inoue C; Fujii S; Kaneda S; Fukunaga T; Kaminou T; Kigawa J; Harada T; Ogawa T
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Jul; 40(1):157-61. PubMed ID: 24677497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Inter-observer variation and diagnostic efficacy of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurements obtained by diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in small renal masses.
Ponhold L; Javor D; Heinz-Peer G; Sevcenco S; Hofstetter M; Baltzer PA
Acta Radiol; 2016 Aug; 57(8):1014-20. PubMed ID: 26486599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Quantitative Assessment of Rectal Cancer Response to Neoadjuvant Combined Chemotherapy and Radiation Therapy: Comparison of Three Methods of Positioning Region of Interest for ADC Measurements at Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging.
Blazic IM; Lilic GB; Gajic MM
Radiology; 2017 Feb; 282(2):418-428. PubMed ID: 27253423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurement in ovarian tumor: Effect of region-of-interest methods on ADC values and diagnostic ability.
Mukuda N; Fujii S; Inoue C; Fukunaga T; Tanabe Y; Itamochi H; Ogawa T
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Mar; 43(3):720-5. PubMed ID: 26201495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of measurement method on interobserver variability of apparent diffusion coefficient of lesions in prostate MRI.
Takahashi H; Yoshida K; Kawashima A; Lee NJ; Froemming AT; Adamo DA; Khandelwal A; Bolan CW; Heller MT; Hartman RP; Kim B; Philbrick KA; Carter RE; Mynderse LA; Humphreys MR; Cai JC; Takahashi N
PLoS One; 2022; 17(5):e0268829. PubMed ID: 35604891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of region of interest on ADC and interobserver variability in thyroid nodules.
Zhou X; Ma C; Wang Z; Liu JL; Rui YP; Li YH; Peng YF
BMC Med Imaging; 2019 Jul; 19(1):55. PubMed ID: 31299927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Tumour ADC measurements in rectal cancer: effect of ROI methods on ADC values and interobserver variability.
Lambregts DM; Beets GL; Maas M; Curvo-Semedo L; Kessels AG; Thywissen T; Beets-Tan RG
Eur Radiol; 2011 Dec; 21(12):2567-74. PubMed ID: 21822946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging for assessment of histologic grade of hepatocellular carcinoma: comparison of three methods for positioning region of interest.
Wei Y; Gao F; Wang M; Huang Z; Tang H; Li J; Wang Y; Zhang T; Wei X; Zheng D; Song B
Eur Radiol; 2019 Feb; 29(2):535-544. PubMed ID: 30027411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of region of interest size on ADC measurements in pancreatic adenocarcinoma.
Ma C; Guo X; Liu L; Zhan Q; Li J; Zhu C; Wang L; Zhang J; Fang X; Qu J; Chen S; Shao C; Lu JP
Cancer Imaging; 2017 May; 17(1):13. PubMed ID: 28464866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Is there a systematic bias of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurements of the breast if measured on different workstations? An inter- and intra-reader agreement study.
Clauser P; Marcon M; Maieron M; Zuiani C; Bazzocchi M; Baltzer PA
Eur Radiol; 2016 Jul; 26(7):2291-6. PubMed ID: 26443604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
