These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

434 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27516617)

  • 1. Refining the Use of Linkage Disequilibrium as a Robust Signature of Selective Sweeps.
    Jacobs GS; Sluckin TJ; Kivisild T
    Genetics; 2016 Aug; 203(4):1807-25. PubMed ID: 27516617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Persistency of Prediction Accuracy and Genetic Gain in Synthetic Populations Under Recurrent Genomic Selection.
    Müller D; Schopp P; Melchinger AE
    G3 (Bethesda); 2017 Mar; 7(3):801-811. PubMed ID: 28064189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Soft shoulders ahead: spurious signatures of soft and partial selective sweeps result from linked hard sweeps.
    Schrider DR; Mendes FK; Hahn MW; Kern AD
    Genetics; 2015 May; 200(1):267-84. PubMed ID: 25716978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. New Software for the Fast Estimation of Population Recombination Rates (FastEPRR) in the Genomic Era.
    Gao F; Ming C; Hu W; Li H
    G3 (Bethesda); 2016 Jun; 6(6):1563-71. PubMed ID: 27172192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Detecting positive selection from genome scans of linkage disequilibrium.
    Huff CD; Harpending HC; Rogers AR
    BMC Genomics; 2010 Jan; 11():8. PubMed ID: 20051139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Detection and Classification of Hard and Soft Sweeps from Unphased Genotypes by Multilocus Genotype Identity.
    Harris AM; Garud NR; DeGiorgio M
    Genetics; 2018 Dec; 210(4):1429-1452. PubMed ID: 30315068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. On detecting incomplete soft or hard selective sweeps using haplotype structure.
    Ferrer-Admetlla A; Liang M; Korneliussen T; Nielsen R
    Mol Biol Evol; 2014 May; 31(5):1275-91. PubMed ID: 24554778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Identifying and Classifying Shared Selective Sweeps from Multilocus Data.
    Harris AM; DeGiorgio M
    Genetics; 2020 May; 215(1):143-171. PubMed ID: 32152048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Detecting Positive Selection in Populations Using Genetic Data.
    Koropoulis A; Alachiotis N; Pavlidis P
    Methods Mol Biol; 2020; 2090():87-123. PubMed ID: 31975165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A Composite-Likelihood Method for Detecting Incomplete Selective Sweep from Population Genomic Data.
    Vy HM; Kim Y
    Genetics; 2015 Jun; 200(2):633-49. PubMed ID: 25911658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Linkage disequilibrium as a signature of selective sweeps.
    Kim Y; Nielsen R
    Genetics; 2004 Jul; 167(3):1513-24. PubMed ID: 15280259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accuracy of Genomic Prediction in Synthetic Populations Depending on the Number of Parents, Relatedness, and Ancestral Linkage Disequilibrium.
    Schopp P; Müller D; Technow F; Melchinger AE
    Genetics; 2017 Jan; 205(1):441-454. PubMed ID: 28049710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The structure of linkage disequilibrium around a selective sweep.
    McVean G
    Genetics; 2007 Mar; 175(3):1395-406. PubMed ID: 17194788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Two-dimensional site frequency spectrum for detecting, classifying and dating incomplete selective sweeps.
    Satta Y; Zheng W; Nishiyama KV; Iwasaki RL; Hayakawa T; Fujito NT; Takahata N
    Genes Genet Syst; 2020 Jan; 94(6):283-300. PubMed ID: 31827009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Temporal challenges in detecting balancing selection from population genomic data.
    Soni V; Jensen JD
    G3 (Bethesda); 2024 Jun; 14(6):. PubMed ID: 38551137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Impact of polymorphic transposable elements on linkage disequilibrium along chromosomes.
    Choudhury RR; Rogivue A; Gugerli F; Parisod C
    Mol Ecol; 2019 Mar; 28(6):1550-1562. PubMed ID: 30633406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Population Genomics of
    Lynch M; Gutenkunst R; Ackerman M; Spitze K; Ye Z; Maruki T; Jia Z
    Genetics; 2017 May; 206(1):315-332. PubMed ID: 27932545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Using the variability of linkage disequilibrium between subpopulations to infer sweeps and epistatic selection in a diverse panel of chickens.
    Beissinger TM; Gholami M; Erbe M; Weigend S; Weigend A; de Leon N; Gianola D; Simianer H
    Heredity (Edinb); 2016 Feb; 116(2):158-66. PubMed ID: 26350629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A practical genome scan for population-specific strong selective sweeps that have reached fixation.
    Kimura R; Fujimoto A; Tokunaga K; Ohashi J
    PLoS One; 2007 Mar; 2(3):e286. PubMed ID: 17356696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Selective sweeps in a 2-locus model for sex-ratio meiotic drive in Drosophila simulans.
    Derome N; Baudry E; Ogereau D; Veuille M; Montchamp-Moreau C
    Mol Biol Evol; 2008 Feb; 25(2):409-16. PubMed ID: 18071199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.