458 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27518129)
1. Neodymium-doped yttrium aluminium garnet (Nd:YAG) 1064-nm picosecond laser vs. Nd:YAG 1064-nm nanosecond laser in tattoo removal: a randomized controlled single-blind clinical trial.
Pinto F; Große-Büning S; Karsai S; Weiß C; Bäumler W; Hammes S; Felcht M; Raulin C
Br J Dermatol; 2017 Feb; 176(2):457-464. PubMed ID: 27518129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The efficacy and the adverse reactions of laser-assisted tattoo removal - a prospective split study using nanosecond and picosecond lasers.
Bäumler W; Breu C; Philipp B; Haslböck B; Berneburg M; Weiß KT
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2022 Feb; 36(2):305-312. PubMed ID: 34543473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Successful Treatment of Cosmetic Eyebrow Tattoos in Fitzpatrick III-IV With Picosecond (1,064, 532-nm) Neodymium-Doped Yttrium Aluminum Garnet Laser With a Perfluorodecalin-Infused Patch: A Pilot Study.
Moustafa F; Suggs A; Hamill SS; Friedman PM
Lasers Surg Med; 2020 Sep; 52(7):586-589. PubMed ID: 31828826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Treatment of pigmentary disorders in patients with skin of color with a novel 755 nm picosecond, Q-switched ruby, and Q-switched Nd:YAG nanosecond lasers: A retrospective photographic review.
Levin MK; Ng E; Bae YS; Brauer JA; Geronemus RG
Lasers Surg Med; 2016 Feb; 48(2):181-7. PubMed ID: 26922302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of two picosecond lasers to a nanosecond laser for treating tattoos: a prospective randomized study on 49 patients.
Lorgeou A; Perrillat Y; Gral N; Lagrange S; Lacour JP; Passeron T
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2018 Feb; 32(2):265-270. PubMed ID: 28758261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of responses of tattoos to picosecond and nanosecond Q-switched neodymium: YAG lasers.
Ross V; Naseef G; Lin G; Kelly M; Michaud N; Flotte TJ; Raythen J; Anderson RR
Arch Dermatol; 1998 Feb; 134(2):167-71. PubMed ID: 9487208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of Q-switched Nd:YAG laser alone versus its combination with ultrapulse CO
Vanarase M; Gautam RK; Arora P; Bajaj S; Meena N; Khurana A
J Cosmet Laser Ther; 2017 Oct; 19(5):259-265. PubMed ID: 28394665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Picosecond lasers for tattoo removal: a systematic review.
Reiter O; Atzmony L; Akerman L; Levi A; Kershenovich R; Lapidoth M; Mimouni D
Lasers Med Sci; 2016 Sep; 31(7):1397-405. PubMed ID: 27311768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Combination of CO2 and Q-switched Nd:YAG lasers is more effective than Q-switched Nd:YAG laser alone for eyebrow tattoo removal.
Radmanesh M; Rafiei Z
J Cosmet Laser Ther; 2015 Apr; 17(2):65-8. PubMed ID: 25411720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A continuously variable beam-diameter, high-fluence, Q-switched Nd:YAG laser for tattoo removal: comparison of the maximum beam diameter to a standard 4-mm-diameter treatment beam.
Bernstein EF; Civiok JM
Lasers Surg Med; 2013 Dec; 45(10):621-7. PubMed ID: 24259108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Laser removal of tattoos.
Kuperman-Beade M; Levine VJ; Ashinoff R
Am J Clin Dermatol; 2001; 2(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 11702617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Successful Treatment of Cosmetic Oral Mucosal Tattoos Using QS 694-nm Ruby Laser and 755-nm Alexandrite Picosecond Laser.
Feng H; Christman MP; Muzumdar S; Geronemus RG
Lasers Surg Med; 2020 Oct; 52(8):705-707. PubMed ID: 31885087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A rapid tattoo removal technique using a combination of pulsed Er:YAG and Q-Switched Nd:YAG in a split lesion protocol.
Sardana K; Ranjan R; Kochhar AM; Mahajan KG; Garg VK
J Cosmet Laser Ther; 2015; 17(4):177-83. PubMed ID: 25588039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of a transparent perfluorodecalin-infused patch as an adjunct to laser-assisted tattoo removal: A pivotal trial.
Biesman BS; Costner C
Lasers Surg Med; 2017 Apr; 49(4):335-340. PubMed ID: 28319270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A split-tattoo randomized Q-switched neodymium-doped yttrium-aluminium-garnet laser trial comparing the efficacy of a novel three-pass, one-session method with a conventional method in the treatment of blue/black tattoos in darker skin types.
Narayanan A; Bhari N; Sreenivas V; Sharma VK; Sethuraman G
Clin Exp Dermatol; 2022 Jan; 47(1):125-128. PubMed ID: 34236705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Perfluorodecalin-infused patch in picosecond and Q-switched laser-assisted tattoo removal: Safety in Fitzpatrick IV-VI skin types.
Vangipuram R; Hamill SS; Friedman PM
Lasers Surg Med; 2019 Jan; 51(1):23-26. PubMed ID: 30311666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Combination of Dual Wavelength Picosecond and Nanosecond Pulse Width Neodymium-Doped Yttrium-Aluminum-Garnet Lasers for Tattoo Removal.
Kato H; Doi K; Kanayama K; Araki J; Nakatsukasa S; Chi D; Mori M; Fuse Y; Sakae Y; Uozumi T
Lasers Surg Med; 2020 Jul; 52(6):515-522. PubMed ID: 31729066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of the Q-switched alexandrite, Nd:YAG, and ruby lasers in treating blue-black tattoos.
Leuenberger ML; Mulas MW; Hata TR; Goldman MP; Fitzpatrick RE; Grevelink JM
Dermatol Surg; 1999 Jan; 25(1):10-4. PubMed ID: 9935085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A randomized, split-face clinical trial of low-fluence Q-switched neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet (1,064 nm) laser versus low-fluence Q-switched alexandrite laser (755 nm) for the treatment of facial melasma.
Fabi SG; Friedmann DP; Niwa Massaki AB; Goldman MP
Lasers Surg Med; 2014 Sep; 46(7):531-7. PubMed ID: 24895301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of a single treatment with Q-switched ruby laser and Q-switched Nd:YAG laser in removing black-blue Chinese tattoos.
Lin T; Jia G; Rong H; Li J; Zhou Z
J Cosmet Laser Ther; 2009 Dec; 11(4):236-9. PubMed ID: 19951195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
