192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27519125)
1. A clinically relevant MRI grading system for lumbar central canal stenosis.
Yuan S; Zou Y; Li Y; Chen M; Yue Y
Clin Imaging; 2016; 40(6):1140-1145. PubMed ID: 27519125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A new grading system of lumbar central canal stenosis on MRI: an easy and reliable method.
Lee GY; Lee JW; Choi HS; Oh KJ; Kang HS
Skeletal Radiol; 2011 Aug; 40(8):1033-9. PubMed ID: 21286714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Axial loading during magnetic resonance imaging in patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis: does it reproduce the positional change of the dural sac detected by upright myelography?
Kanno H; Endo T; Ozawa H; Koizumi Y; Morozumi N; Itoi E; Ishii Y
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Jul; 37(16):E985-92. PubMed ID: 21258271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. MRI study of the lumbar spine in achondroplasia. A morphometric analysis for the evaluation of stenosis of the canal.
Jeong ST; Song HR; Keny SM; Telang SS; Suh SW; Hong SJ
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2006 Sep; 88(9):1192-6. PubMed ID: 16943471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Circulatory dynamics of the cauda equina in lumbar canal stenosis using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.
Kobayashi S; Suzuki Y; Meir A; Al-Khudairi N; Nakane T; Hayakawa K
Spine J; 2015 Oct; 15(10):2132-41. PubMed ID: 25998328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of indirect decompression of the lumbar spinal canal following minimally invasive lateral transpsoas interbody fusion: radiographic and outcome analysis.
Elowitz EH; Yanni DS; Chwajol M; Starke RM; Perin NI
Minim Invasive Neurosurg; 2011 Oct; 54(5-6):201-6. PubMed ID: 22278781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Redundant nerve roots of the cauda equina in lumbar spinal canal stenosis, an MR study on 500 cases.
Poureisa M; Daghighi MH; Eftekhari P; Bookani KR; Fouladi DF
Eur Spine J; 2015 Oct; 24(10):2315-20. PubMed ID: 26071946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dynamic change of dural sac cross-sectional area in axial loaded magnetic resonance imaging correlates with the severity of clinical symptoms in patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis.
Kanno H; Ozawa H; Koizumi Y; Morozumi N; Aizawa T; Kusakabe T; Ishii Y; Itoi E
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Feb; 37(3):207-13. PubMed ID: 21301392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Verification of measurements of lumbar spinal dimensions in T1- and T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging sequences.
Cheung JP; Shigematsu H; Cheung KM
Spine J; 2014 Aug; 14(8):1476-83. PubMed ID: 24314906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The diagnostic value of magnetic resonance imaging measurements for assessing cervical spinal canal stenosis.
Rüegg TB; Wicki AG; Aebli N; Wisianowsky C; Krebs J
J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Mar; 22(3):230-6. PubMed ID: 25525959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effect of body position and axial load on spinal canal morphology: an MRI study of central spinal stenosis.
Madsen R; Jensen TS; Pope M; Sørensen JS; Bendix T
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jan; 33(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 18165750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: correlation with Oswestry Disability Index and MR imaging.
Sirvanci M; Bhatia M; Ganiyusufoglu KA; Duran C; Tezer M; Ozturk C; Aydogan M; Hamzaoglu A
Eur Spine J; 2008 May; 17(5):679-85. PubMed ID: 18324426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Lumbar spinal canal dimensions measured intraoperatively after decompression are not properly rendered on early postoperative MRI.
Schenck C; van Susante J; van Gorp M; Belder R; Vleggeert-Lankamp C
Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2016 May; 158(5):981-8. PubMed ID: 27005673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reducing surgical levels by paraspinal mapping and diffusion tensor imaging techniques in lumbar spinal stenosis.
Chen HB; Wan Q; Xu QF; Chen Y; Bai B
J Orthop Surg Res; 2016 Apr; 11(1):47. PubMed ID: 27113931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Correlation of lateral stenosis in MRI with symptoms, walking capacity and EMG findings in patients with surgically confirmed lateral lumbar spinal canal stenosis.
Kuittinen P; Sipola P; Aalto TJ; Määttä S; Parviainen A; Saari T; Sinikallio S; Savolainen S; Turunen V; Kröger H; Airaksinen O; Leinonen V
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2014 Jul; 15():247. PubMed ID: 25051886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Relationship between alterations of the lumbar spine, visualized with magnetic resonance imaging, and occupational variables.
Mariconda M; Galasso O; Imbimbo L; Lotti G; Milano C
Eur Spine J; 2007 Feb; 16(2):255-66. PubMed ID: 16835739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Qualitative grading of severity of lumbar spinal stenosis based on the morphology of the dural sac on magnetic resonance images.
Schizas C; Theumann N; Burn A; Tansey R; Wardlaw D; Smith FW; Kulik G
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Oct; 35(21):1919-24. PubMed ID: 20671589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The relationship between the cross-sectional area of the cauda equina and the preoperative symptoms in central lumbar spinal stenosis.
Ogikubo O; Forsberg L; Hansson T
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Jun; 32(13):1423-8; discussion 1429. PubMed ID: 17545910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dural sac cross-sectional area does not correlate with efficacy of percutaneous adhesiolysis in single level lumbar spinal stenosis.
Park CH; Lee SH; Jung JY
Pain Physician; 2011; 14(4):377-82. PubMed ID: 21785481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Changes in dural sac caliber with standing MRI improve correlation with symptoms of lumbar spinal stenosis.
Lau YYO; Lee RKL; Griffith JF; Chan CLY; Law SW; Kwok KO
Eur Spine J; 2017 Oct; 26(10):2666-2675. PubMed ID: 28702785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
