317 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27519546)
1. The norepinephrine system affects specific neurophysiological subprocesses in the modulation of inhibitory control by working memory demands.
Chmielewski WX; Mückschel M; Ziemssen T; Beste C
Hum Brain Mapp; 2017 Jan; 38(1):68-81. PubMed ID: 27519546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The impact of mental workload on inhibitory control subprocesses.
Chmielewski WX; Mückschel M; Stock AK; Beste C
Neuroimage; 2015 May; 112():96-104. PubMed ID: 25754069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The role of phasic norepinephrine modulations during task switching: evidence for specific effects in parietal areas.
Wolff N; Mückschel M; Ziemssen T; Beste C
Brain Struct Funct; 2018 Mar; 223(2):925-940. PubMed ID: 29026994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The norepinephrine system and its relevance for multi-component behavior.
Mückschel M; Gohil K; Ziemssen T; Beste C
Neuroimage; 2017 Feb; 146():1062-1070. PubMed ID: 27720820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Demands on response inhibition processes determine modulations of theta band activity in superior frontal areas and correlations with pupillometry - Implications for the norepinephrine system during inhibitory control.
Dippel G; Mückschel M; Ziemssen T; Beste C
Neuroimage; 2017 Aug; 157():575-585. PubMed ID: 28647483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. On the dependence of response inhibition processes on sensory modality.
Bodmer B; Beste C
Hum Brain Mapp; 2017 Apr; 38(4):1941-1951. PubMed ID: 28045223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Properties of lower level processing modulate the actions of the norepinephrine system during response inhibition.
Mückschel M; Ziemssen T; Beste C
Biol Psychol; 2020 Apr; 152():107862. PubMed ID: 32032625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Short-term training in the Go/Nogo task: behavioural and neural changes depend on task demands.
Benikos N; Johnstone SJ; Roodenrys SJ
Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Mar; 87(3):301-12. PubMed ID: 23247193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Stimulus-response recoding during inhibitory control is associated with superior frontal and parahippocampal processes.
Chmielewski WX; Beste C
Neuroimage; 2019 Aug; 196():227-236. PubMed ID: 30991125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. How the depth of processing modulates emotional interference - evidence from EEG and pupil diameter data.
Schreiter ML; Chmielewski WX; Mückschel M; Ziemssen T; Beste C
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2019 Oct; 19(5):1231-1246. PubMed ID: 31190135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A possible role of the norepinephrine system during sequential cognitive flexibility - Evidence from EEG and pupil diameter data.
Giller F; Mückschel M; Ziemssen T; Beste C
Cortex; 2020 Jul; 128():22-34. PubMed ID: 32311545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The relationship between ERP components and EEG spatial complexity in a visual Go/Nogo task.
Jia H; Li H; Yu D
J Neurophysiol; 2017 Jan; 117(1):275-283. PubMed ID: 27784803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A role of the norepinephrine system or effort in the interplay of different facets of inhibitory control.
Yu S; Ghin F; Mückschel M; Ziemssen T; Stock AK; Beste C
Neuropsychologia; 2022 Feb; 166():108143. PubMed ID: 34998865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The system neurophysiological basis of non-adaptive cognitive control: Inhibition of implicit learning mediated by right prefrontal regions.
Stock AK; Steenbergen L; Colzato L; Beste C
Hum Brain Mapp; 2016 Dec; 37(12):4511-4522. PubMed ID: 27477001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. When 'go' and 'nogo' are equally frequent: ERP components and cortical tomography.
Lavric A; Pizzagalli DA; Forstmeier S
Eur J Neurosci; 2004 Nov; 20(9):2483-8. PubMed ID: 15525290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Modulations of cognitive flexibility in obsessive compulsive disorder reflect dysfunctions of perceptual categorization.
Wolff N; Buse J; Tost J; Roessner V; Beste C
J Child Psychol Psychiatry; 2017 Aug; 58(8):939-949. PubMed ID: 28452405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. How perceptual ambiguity affects response inhibition processes.
Adelhöfer N; Chmielewski WX; Beste C
J Neurophysiol; 2019 Aug; 122(2):500-511. PubMed ID: 31166823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of task complexity on ERP components in Go/Nogo tasks.
Gajewski PD; Falkenstein M
Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Mar; 87(3):273-8. PubMed ID: 22906814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mental fatigue and impaired response processes: event-related brain potentials in a Go/NoGo task.
Kato Y; Endo H; Kizuka T
Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 May; 72(2):204-11. PubMed ID: 19135100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Anodal tDCS affects neuromodulatory effects of the norepinephrine system on superior frontal theta activity during response inhibition.
Adelhöfer N; Mückschel M; Teufert B; Ziemssen T; Beste C
Brain Struct Funct; 2019 Apr; 224(3):1291-1300. PubMed ID: 30701308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
