These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27519770)

  • 1. Does contextual strength modulate the subordinate bias effect? A reply to Kellas and Vu.
    Binder KS; Rayner K
    Psychon Bull Rev; 1999 Sep; 6(3):518-22. PubMed ID: 27519770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Strength of context does modulate the subordinate bias effect: a reply to Binder and Rayner.
    Kellas G; Vu H
    Psychon Bull Rev; 1999 Sep; 6(3):511-7; discussion 518-22. PubMed ID: 12198791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Contextual strength and the subordinate bias effect: comment on Martin, Vu, Kellas, and Metcalf.
    Rayner K; Binder KS; Duffy SA
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1999 Nov; 52(4):841-52; discussion 853-5. PubMed ID: 10605394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prelude to Everest: Alexander M. Kellas and the 1920 high altitude scientific expedition to Kamet.
    Rodway GW
    High Alt Med Biol; 2004; 5(3):364-79. PubMed ID: 15454003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Contextual modulation of N400 amplitude to lexically ambiguous words.
    Titone DA; Salisbury DF
    Brain Cogn; 2004 Aug; 55(3):470-8. PubMed ID: 15223192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessing the belief bias effect with ROCs: reply to Dube, Rotello, and Heit (2010).
    Klauer KC; Kellen D
    Psychol Rev; 2011 Jan; 118(1):164-73. PubMed ID: 21244192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. FAMILIARITY TRANSFER AS AN EXPLANATION OF THE DÉJÀ VU EFFECT.
    Małecki M
    Psychol Rep; 2015 Jun; 116(3):955-82. PubMed ID: 25871565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Strength of discourse context as a determinant of the subordinate bias effect.
    Martin C; Vu H; Kellas G; Metcalf K
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1999 Nov; 52(4):813-39. PubMed ID: 10660407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How has the impact of 'care pathway technologies' on service integration in stroke care been measured and what is the strength of the evidence to support their effectiveness in this respect?
    Allen D; Rixson L
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2008 Mar; 6(1):78-110. PubMed ID: 21631815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Exploring the role of contextual information in bloodstain pattern analysis: A qualitative approach.
    Osborne NKP; Taylor MC; Zajac R
    Forensic Sci Int; 2016 Mar; 260():1-8. PubMed ID: 26774408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Vu Thien Binh et al. reply.
    Binh VT; Purcell ST; Garcia N
    Phys Rev Lett; 1993 Apr; 70(16):2504. PubMed ID: 10053579
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. On determining the intracranial sources of visual evoked potentials from scalp topography: a reply to Kelly et al. (this issue).
    Ales JM; Yates JL; Norcia AM
    Neuroimage; 2013 Jan; 64():703-11. PubMed ID: 22982584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Competition for associative strength between a punctate signal and contextual stimuli: Effect of signal preexposure versus context preexposure.
    Maes JH; Vossen JM
    Behav Processes; 1993 Aug; 30(1):29-46. PubMed ID: 24896470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Validation of the Amsterdam Beverage Picture Set: A Controlled Picture Set for Cognitive Bias Measurement and Modification Paradigms.
    Pronk T; van Deursen DS; Beraha EM; Larsen H; Wiers RW
    Alcohol Clin Exp Res; 2015 Oct; 39(10):2047-55. PubMed ID: 26431117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. When being narrow minded is a good thing: locally biased people show stronger contextual cueing.
    Bellaera L; von Mühlenen A; Watson DG
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(6):1242-8. PubMed ID: 24313265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An important previously unpublished manuscript by A. M. Kellas.
    West JB
    High Alt Med Biol; 2001; 2(3):321-2. PubMed ID: 11729833
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Eye movements and lexical ambiguity resolution: investigating the subordinate-bias effect.
    Sereno SC; O'Donnell PJ; Rayner K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Apr; 32(2):335-50. PubMed ID: 16634674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The belief bias effect is aptly named: a reply to Klauer and Kellen (2011).
    Dube C; Rotello CM; Heit E
    Psychol Rev; 2011 Jan; 118(1):155-63. PubMed ID: 21244191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Peering into the bias blind spot: people's assessments of bias in themselves and others.
    Ehrlinger J; Gilovich T; Ross L
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2005 May; 31(5):680-92. PubMed ID: 15802662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The critical role of the research question, inclusion criteria, and transparency in meta-analyses of integrity test research: a reply to Harris et al. (2012) and Ones, Viswesvaran, and Schmidt (2012).
    Van Iddekinge CH; Roth PL; Raymark PH; Odle-Dusseau HN
    J Appl Psychol; 2012 May; 97(3):543-9; discussion 531-6, 537-42. PubMed ID: 22582729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.