These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

240 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27519772)

  • 1. Safety of Computer Interpretation of Normal Triage Electrocardiograms.
    Hughes KE; Lewis SM; Katz L; Jones J
    Acad Emerg Med; 2017 Jan; 24(1):120-124. PubMed ID: 27519772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Emergent cardiac outcomes in patients with normal electrocardiograms in the emergency department.
    Winters LJ; Dhillon RK; Pannu GK; Terrassa P; Holmes JF; Bing ML
    Am J Emerg Med; 2022 Jan; 51():384-387. PubMed ID: 34823195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Validity of Computer-interpreted "Normal" and "Otherwise Normal" ECG in Emergency Department Triage Patients.
    Deutsch A; Poroksy K; Westafer L; Visintainer P; Mader T
    West J Emerg Med; 2024 Jan; 25(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 38205978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A prospective analysis of time to screen protocol ECGs in adult Emergency Department triage patients.
    Villarroel NA; Houghton CJ; Mader SC; Poronsky KE; Deutsch AL; Mader TJ
    Am J Emerg Med; 2021 Aug; 46():23-26. PubMed ID: 33706253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Can an ECG performed during emergency department triage and interpreted as normal by computer analysis safely wait for clinician review until the time of patient assessment? A pilot study.
    Tabner A; Jones M; Fakis A; Johnson G
    J Electrocardiol; 2021; 68():145-149. PubMed ID: 34450449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Comparison of Physician to Computer Interpreted Electrocardiograms on ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction Door-to-balloon Times.
    Mawri S; Michaels A; Gibbs J; Shah S; Rao S; Kugelmass A; Lingam N; Arida M; Jacobsen G; Rowlandson I; Iyer K; Khandelwal A; McCord J
    Crit Pathw Cardiol; 2016 Mar; 15(1):22-5. PubMed ID: 26881816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The emergency department versus the computer: which is the better electrocardiographer?
    Snyder CS; Fenrich AL; Friedman RA; Macias C; O'Reilly K; Kertesz NJ
    Pediatr Cardiol; 2003; 24(4):364-8. PubMed ID: 12457259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accuracy of ECG interpretation in the pediatric emergency department.
    Wathen JE; Rewers AB; Yetman AT; Schaffer MS
    Ann Emerg Med; 2005 Dec; 46(6):507-11. PubMed ID: 16308065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The utility of the triage electrocardiogram for the detection of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.
    Noll S; Alvey H; Jayaprakash N; Paranjpe A; Miller J; Moyer ML; Nowak R
    Am J Emerg Med; 2018 Oct; 36(10):1771-1774. PubMed ID: 29548521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Emergency department interpretation of electrocardiograms.
    Westdrop EJ; Gratton MC; Watson WA
    Ann Emerg Med; 1992 May; 21(5):541-4. PubMed ID: 1570910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Obstructive myocardial infarction with normal automated ECG interpretation: A case report.
    Herzog D; Scavelli CN
    Am J Emerg Med; 2024 May; 79():232.e1-232.e3. PubMed ID: 38521713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accuracy of electrocardiogram interpretation by cardiologists in the setting of incorrect computer analysis.
    Anh D; Krishnan S; Bogun F
    J Electrocardiol; 2006 Jul; 39(3):343-5. PubMed ID: 16777525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Employment of intra-individual variability to improve computerized ECG interpretation.
    Schijvenaars BJ; Kors JA; van Herpen G; van Bemmel JH
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2001; 84(Pt 1):513-7. PubMed ID: 11604793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Emergency physicians should be shown all triage ECGs, even those with a computer interpretation of "Normal".
    Litell JM; Meyers HP; Smith SW
    J Electrocardiol; 2019; 54():79-81. PubMed ID: 30928822
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accuracy Screening for ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction in a Task-switching Simulation.
    Soares WE; Price LL; Prast B; Tarbox E; Mader TJ; Blanchard R
    West J Emerg Med; 2019 Jan; 20(1):177-184. PubMed ID: 30643622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prolonged QT interval diagnosis suppression by a widely used computerized ECG analysis system.
    Garg A; Lehmann MH
    Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol; 2013 Feb; 6(1):76-83. PubMed ID: 23275261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Emergency physician accuracy in interpreting electrocardiograms with potential ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: Is it enough?
    Veronese G; Germini F; Ingrassia S; Cutuli O; Donati V; Bonacchini L; Marcucci M; Fabbri A;
    Acute Card Care; 2016 Mar; 18(1):7-10. PubMed ID: 27759433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Errors in the computerized electrocardiogram interpretation of cardiac rhythm.
    Shah AP; Rubin SA
    J Electrocardiol; 2007; 40(5):385-90. PubMed ID: 17531257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Diversion of ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients for primary angioplasty based on wireless prehospital 12-lead electrocardiographic transmission directly to the cardiologist's handheld computer: a progress report.
    Clemmensen P; Sejersten M; Sillesen M; Hampton D; Wagner GS; Loumann-Nielsen S
    J Electrocardiol; 2005 Oct; 38(4 Suppl):194-8. PubMed ID: 16226101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Analysis of emergency department interpretation of electrocardiograms.
    Snoey ER; Housset B; Guyon P; ElHaddad S; Valty J; Hericord P
    J Accid Emerg Med; 1994 Sep; 11(3):149-53. PubMed ID: 7804577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.