These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27519776)

  • 21. A strategy for residual error modeling incorporating scedasticity of variance and distribution shape.
    Dosne AG; Bergstrand M; Karlsson MO
    J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn; 2016 Apr; 43(2):137-51. PubMed ID: 26679003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Bayesian Semiparametric Density Deconvolution in the Presence of Conditionally Heteroscedastic Measurement Errors.
    Sarkar A; Mallick BK; Staudenmayer J; Pati D; Carroll RJ
    J Comput Graph Stat; 2014 Oct; 23(4):1101-1125. PubMed ID: 25378893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Psychometric properties for the Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding: dichotomous versus polytomous conventional and IRT scoring.
    Vispoel WP; Kim HY
    Psychol Assess; 2014 Sep; 26(3):878-91. PubMed ID: 24708082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparison of two treatments with skewed ordinal responses.
    Lu TY; Poon WY; Cheung SH
    Stat Med; 2016 Jan; 35(2):189-201. PubMed ID: 26289419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Summed Score Likelihood-Based Indices for Testing Latent Variable Distribution Fit in Item Response Theory.
    Li Z; Cai L
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2018 Oct; 78(5):857-886. PubMed ID: 32655173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The Monotonic Polynomial Graded Response Model: Implementation and a Comparative Study.
    Falk CF
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2020 Sep; 44(6):465-481. PubMed ID: 32788817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Semi-Nonparametric Methods for Detecting Latent Non-normality: A Fusion of Latent Trait and Ordered Latent Class Modeling.
    Schmitt JE; Mehta PD; Aggen SH; Kubarych TS; Neale MC
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2006 Dec; 41(4):427-43. PubMed ID: 26794913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Overfactoring in rating scale data: A comparison between factor analysis and item response theory.
    Revuelta J; Ximénez C; Minaya N
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():982137. PubMed ID: 36533017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Is the assumption of normality or log-normality for continuous response data critical for benchmark dose estimation?
    Shao K; Gift JS; Setzer RW
    Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2013 Nov; 272(3):767-79. PubMed ID: 23954464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Unifying Differential Item Functioning in Factor Analysis for Categorical Data Under a Discretization of a Normal Variant.
    Chang YW; Hsu NJ; Tsai RC
    Psychometrika; 2017 Jun; 82(2):382-406. PubMed ID: 28213678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effect of Box-Cox transformation on power of Haseman-Elston and maximum-likelihood variance components tests to detect quantitative trait Loci.
    Etzel CJ; Shete S; Beasley TM; Fernandez JR; Allison DB; Amos CI
    Hum Hered; 2003; 55(2-3):108-16. PubMed ID: 12931049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Asymptotic Posterior Normality of Multivariate Latent Traits in an IRT Model.
    Kornely MJK; Kateri M
    Psychometrika; 2022 Sep; 87(3):1146-1172. PubMed ID: 35149979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. High-Dimensional Heteroscedastic Regression with an Application to eQTL Data Analysis.
    Daye ZJ; Chen J; Li H
    Biometrics; 2012 Mar; 68(1):316-326. PubMed ID: 22547833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Preliminary testing for normality: some statistical aspects of a common concept.
    Schoder V; Himmelmann A; Wilhelm KP
    Clin Exp Dermatol; 2006 Nov; 31(6):757-61. PubMed ID: 17040259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A heteroscedastic hidden Markov mixture model for responses and categorized response times.
    Molenaar D; Rózsa S; Bolsinova M
    Behav Res Methods; 2019 Apr; 51(2):676-696. PubMed ID: 30924104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Power and sample size determination in the Rasch model: evaluation of the robustness of a numerical method to non-normality of the latent trait.
    Guilleux A; Blanchin M; Hardouin JB; Sébille V
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(1):e83652. PubMed ID: 24427276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Hypothesis testing in an errors-in-variables model with heteroscedastic measurement errors.
    de Castro M; Galea M; Bolfarine H
    Stat Med; 2008 Nov; 27(25):5217-34. PubMed ID: 18561290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Inference and diagnostics for heteroscedastic nonlinear regression models under skew scale mixtures of normal distributions.
    da Silva Ferreira C; Lachos VH; Garay AM
    J Appl Stat; 2020; 47(9):1690-1719. PubMed ID: 35707586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Genetic heteroscedastic models for ordinal traits: application to sheep litter size.
    Fathallah S; Bodin L; David I
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Apr; 48():30. PubMed ID: 27038606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Assessing items on the SF-8 Japanese version for health-related quality of life: a psychometric analysis based on the nominal categories model of item response theory.
    Tokuda Y; Okubo T; Ohde S; Jacobs J; Takahashi O; Omata F; Yanai H; Hinohara S; Fukui T
    Value Health; 2009 Jun; 12(4):568-73. PubMed ID: 18783391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.