These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
395 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27520859)
21. [Oncologic esophageal resection and reconstruction : Open, hybrid, minimally invasive or robotic?]. Gockel I; Lorenz D Chirurg; 2017 Jun; 88(6):496-502. PubMed ID: 28058494 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The use of a tailored surgical technique for minimally invasive esophagectomy. Javidfar J; Bacchetta M; Yang JA; Miller J; D'Ovidio F; Ginsburg ME; Gorenstein LA; Bessler M; Sonett JR J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012 May; 143(5):1125-9. PubMed ID: 22500593 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Aortic Calcification Increases the Risk of Anastomotic Leakage After Ivor-Lewis Esophagectomy. Goense L; van Rossum PSN; Weijs TJ; van Det MJ; Nieuwenhuijzen GA; Luyer MD; van Leeuwen MS; van Hillegersberg R; Ruurda JP; Kouwenhoven EA Ann Thorac Surg; 2016 Jul; 102(1):247-52. PubMed ID: 27112648 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Outcomes of cervical end-to-side triangulating esophagogastric anastomosis with minimally invasive esophagectomy. Nakata K; Nagai E; Ohuchida K; Nakamura K; Tanaka M World J Surg; 2015 May; 39(5):1099-104. PubMed ID: 25582767 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Techniques of Esophageal Anastomoses for Esophagectomy. Herron R; Abbas G Surg Clin North Am; 2021 Jun; 101(3):511-524. PubMed ID: 34048770 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Factors Associated with Anastomotic Leak After Transhiatal Esophagectomy: a Single-Institution Analysis. Logarajah S; Cudworth S; Doty M; Darwish M; Osman H; Jay J; Jeyarajah DR J Gastrointest Surg; 2023 Feb; 27(2):398-401. PubMed ID: 36289187 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. An analysis of the risk factors of anastomotic stricture after esophagectomy. Tanaka K; Makino T; Yamasaki M; Nishigaki T; Miyazaki Y; Takahashi T; Kurokawa Y; Nakajima K; Takiguchi S; Mori M; Doki Y Surg Today; 2018 Apr; 48(4):449-454. PubMed ID: 29170824 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A preliminary experience with minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. Tapias LF; Morse CR Dis Esophagus; 2012 Jul; 25(5):449-55. PubMed ID: 21967644 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Surgical outcomes after totally minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Casas MA; Angeramo CA; Bras Harriott C; Schlottmann F Eur J Surg Oncol; 2022 Mar; 48(3):473-481. PubMed ID: 34955315 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Could hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy improve the treatment results of esophageal cancer? Bjelovic M; Babic T; Spica B; Gunjic D; Veselinovic M; Trajkovic G Eur J Surg Oncol; 2016 Aug; 42(8):1196-201. PubMed ID: 27316602 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Transhiatal esophagectomy for squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. Dudhat SB; Shinde SR Dis Esophagus; 1998 Oct; 11(4):226-30. PubMed ID: 10071803 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Risk of stent-related aortic erosion after endoscopic stent insertion for intrathoracic anastomotic leaks after esophagectomy. Schweigert M; Dubecz A; Stadlhuber RJ; Muschweck H; Stein HJ Ann Thorac Surg; 2011 Aug; 92(2):513-8. PubMed ID: 21592460 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Long-term outcome in patients operated with hybrid esophagectomy for esophageal cancer - a cohort study. Hauge T; Amdal CD; Falk RS; Johannessen HO; Johnson E Acta Oncol; 2020 Jul; 59(7):859-865. PubMed ID: 32324079 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparative study of minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer in a single cancer center. Mu J; Yuan Z; Zhang B; Li N; Lyu F; Mao Y; Xue Q; Gao S; Zhao J; Wang D; Li Z; Gao Y; Zhang L; Huang J; Shao K; Feng F; Zhao L; Li J; Cheng G; Sun K; He J Chin Med J (Engl); 2014; 127(4):747-52. PubMed ID: 24534234 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]