These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

262 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27522076)

  • 1. Spatial Mechanisms within the Dorsal Visual Pathway Contribute to the Configural Processing of Faces.
    Zachariou V; Nikas CV; Safiullah ZN; Gotts SJ; Ungerleider LG
    Cereb Cortex; 2017 Aug; 27(8):4124-4138. PubMed ID: 27522076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Double dissociation of configural and featural face processing on P1 and P2 components as a function of spatial attention.
    Wang H; Guo S; Fu S
    Psychophysiology; 2016 Aug; 53(8):1165-73. PubMed ID: 27167853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Fusiform and Occipital Face Areas Can Process a Nonface Category Equivalently to Faces.
    Zachariou V; Safiullah ZN; Ungerleider LG
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2018 Oct; 30(10):1499-1516. PubMed ID: 29877768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Featural and configural face processing strategies: evidence from a functional magnetic resonance imaging study.
    Lobmaier JS; Klaver P; Loenneker T; Martin E; Mast FW
    Neuroreport; 2008 Feb; 19(3):287-91. PubMed ID: 18303568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Configural and featural face processing are differently modulated by attentional resources at early stages: an event-related potential study with rapid serial visual presentation.
    Wang H; Sun P; Ip C; Zhao X; Fu S
    Brain Res; 2015 Mar; 1602():75-84. PubMed ID: 25601005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Spatial attention modulates the temporal sequence of hemispheric asymmetry in configural and featural face processing.
    Wang H; Fu S
    Neuropsychologia; 2018 Mar; 111():269-275. PubMed ID: 29374552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Processing of featural and configural aspects of faces is lateralized in dorsolateral prefrontal cortex: a TMS study.
    Renzi C; Schiavi S; Carbon CC; Vecchi T; Silvanto J; Cattaneo Z
    Neuroimage; 2013 Jul; 74():45-51. PubMed ID: 23435211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Consecutive TMS-fMRI reveals remote effects of neural noise to the "occipital face area".
    Solomon-Harris LM; Rafique SA; Steeves JK
    Brain Res; 2016 Nov; 1650():134-141. PubMed ID: 27590719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Perceptual separability of featural and configural information in congenital prosopagnosia.
    Kimchi R; Behrmann M; Avidan G; Amishav R
    Cogn Neuropsychol; 2012; 29(5-6):447-63. PubMed ID: 23428081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Neural correlates of processing facial identity based on features versus their spacing.
    Maurer D; O'Craven KM; Le Grand R; Mondloch CJ; Springer MV; Lewis TL; Grady CL
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Apr; 45(7):1438-51. PubMed ID: 17204295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. ACC and IPL networks in the perception of the faces of parents during selective tasks.
    Zhai H; Yu Y; Zhang W; Chen G; Jia F
    Brain Imaging Behav; 2016 Dec; 10(4):1172-1183. PubMed ID: 26613720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Losing face: impaired discrimination of featural and configural information in the mouth region of an inverted face.
    Tanaka JW; Kaiser MD; Hagen S; Pierce LJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 May; 76(4):1000-14. PubMed ID: 24477773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Featural and configural face processing in adults and infants: a behavioral and electrophysiological investigation.
    Scott LS
    Perception; 2006; 35(8):1107-28. PubMed ID: 17076069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Spatial-frequency thresholds for configural and featural discriminations in upright and inverted faces.
    Watier NN; Collin CA; Boutet I
    Perception; 2010; 39(4):502-13. PubMed ID: 20514998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Posterior parietal influences on visual network specialization during development: An fMRI study of functional connectivity in children ages 9 to 12.
    O'Rawe JF; Huang AS; Klein DN; Leung HC
    Neuropsychologia; 2019 Apr; 127():158-170. PubMed ID: 30849407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Neural decoding reveals impaired face configural processing in the right fusiform face area of individuals with developmental prosopagnosia.
    Zhang J; Liu J; Xu Y
    J Neurosci; 2015 Jan; 35(4):1539-48. PubMed ID: 25632131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Processing of configural and componential information in face-selective cortical areas.
    Zhao M; Cheung SH; Wong AC; Rhodes G; Chan EK; Chan WW; Hayward WG
    Cogn Neurosci; 2014; 5(3-4):160-7. PubMed ID: 24784503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Faces elicit different scanning patterns depending on task demands.
    Boutet I; Lemieux CL; Goulet MA; Collin CA
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 May; 79(4):1050-1063. PubMed ID: 28185225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Categorical perception effects for facial identity in robustly represented familiar and self-faces: the role of configural and featural information.
    Keyes H
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(4):760-72. PubMed ID: 22248095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The respective role of low and high spatial frequencies in supporting configural and featural processing of faces.
    Goffaux V; Hault B; Michel C; Vuong QC; Rossion B
    Perception; 2005; 34(1):77-86. PubMed ID: 15773608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.