168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27522120)
1. Life cycle assessment of flexibly fed biogas processes for an improved demand-oriented biogas supply.
Ertem FC; Martínez-Blanco J; Finkbeiner M; Neubauer P; Junne S
Bioresour Technol; 2016 Nov; 219():536-544. PubMed ID: 27522120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Consequential environmental life cycle assessment of a farm-scale biogas plant.
Van Stappen F; Mathot M; Decruyenaere V; Loriers A; Delcour A; Planchon V; Goffart JP; Stilmant D
J Environ Manage; 2016 Jun; 175():20-32. PubMed ID: 27017269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Environmental life cycle assessment of nano-cellulose and biogas production from manure.
Krexner T; Bauer A; Zollitsch W; Weiland K; Bismarck A; Mautner A; Medel-Jiménez F; Gronauer A; Kral I
J Environ Manage; 2022 Jul; 314():115093. PubMed ID: 35472838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Benefits of supplementing an industrial waste anaerobic digester with energy crops for increased biogas production.
Nges IA; Escobar F; Fu X; Björnsson L
Waste Manag; 2012 Jan; 32(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 21975301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Anaerobic digestion of different feedstocks: impact on energetic and environmental balances of biogas process.
Bacenetti J; Negri M; Fiala M; González-García S
Sci Total Environ; 2013 Oct; 463-464():541-51. PubMed ID: 23831800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Environmental balance of the UK biogas sector: An evaluation by consequential life cycle assessment.
Styles D; Dominguez EM; Chadwick D
Sci Total Environ; 2016 Aug; 560-561():241-53. PubMed ID: 27101461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative life cycle assessment of biogas plant configurations for a demand oriented biogas supply for flexible power generation.
Hahn H; Hartmann K; Bühle L; Wachendorf M
Bioresour Technol; 2015 Mar; 179():348-358. PubMed ID: 25553565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mitigating the environmental impacts of milk production via anaerobic digestion of manure: case study of a dairy farm in the Po Valley.
Battini F; Agostini A; Boulamanti AK; Giuntoli J; Amaducci S
Sci Total Environ; 2014 May; 481():196-208. PubMed ID: 24598150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Environmental assessment of energy production from anaerobic digestion of pig manure at medium-scale using life cycle assessment.
Ramírez-Islas ME; Güereca LP; Sosa-Rodriguez FS; Cobos-Peralta MA
Waste Manag; 2020 Feb; 102():85-96. PubMed ID: 31669678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Co-digestion of manure with grass silage and pulp and paper mill sludge using nutrient additions.
Hagelqvist A; Granström K
Environ Technol; 2016 Aug; 37(16):2113-23. PubMed ID: 26776302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Utilization of biogas produced by anaerobic digestion of agro-industrial waste: Energy, economic and environmental effects.
Hublin A; Schneider DR; Džodan J
Waste Manag Res; 2014 Jul; 32(7):626-33. PubMed ID: 24963093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Environmental implications of anaerobic digestion for manure management in dairy farms in Mexico: a life cycle perspective.
Rivas-García P; Botello-Álvarez JE; Abel Seabra JE; da Silva Walter AC; Estrada-Baltazar A
Environ Technol; 2015; 36(17):2198-209. PubMed ID: 25732709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biogas production by means of an anaerobic-digestion plant in France: LCA of greenhouse-gas emissions and other environmental indicators.
Lamnatou C; Nicolaï R; Chemisana D; Cristofari C; Cancellieri D
Sci Total Environ; 2019 Jun; 670():1226-1239. PubMed ID: 31018437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Co-digestion of manure and industrial waste--The effects of trace element addition.
Nordell E; Nilsson B; Nilsson Påledal S; Karisalmi K; Moestedt J
Waste Manag; 2016 Jan; 47(Pt A):21-7. PubMed ID: 25812806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Choosing co-substrates to supplement biogas production from animal slurry--a life cycle assessment of the environmental consequences.
Croxatto Vega GC; ten Hoeve M; Birkved M; Sommer SG; Bruun S
Bioresour Technol; 2014 Nov; 171():410-20. PubMed ID: 25226057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparing environmental consequences of anaerobic mono- and co-digestion of pig manure to produce bio-energy--a life cycle perspective.
De Vries JW; Vinken TM; Hamelin L; De Boer IJ
Bioresour Technol; 2012 Dec; 125():239-48. PubMed ID: 23026340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessing anaerobic co-digestion of pig manure with agroindustrial wastes: the link between environmental impacts and operational parameters.
Rodriguez-Verde I; Regueiro L; Carballa M; Hospido A; Lema JM
Sci Total Environ; 2014 Nov; 497-498():475-483. PubMed ID: 25150742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Exploring the environmental consequences of roadside grass as a biogas feedstock in Northwest Europe.
Ravi R; de Souza MF; Adriaens A; Vingerhoets R; Luo H; Van Dael M; Meers E
J Environ Manage; 2023 Oct; 344():118538. PubMed ID: 37406494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Arundo donax L. can substitute traditional energy crops for more efficient, environmentally-friendly production of biogas: A Life Cycle Assessment approach.
D'Imporzano G; Pilu R; Corno L; Adani F
Bioresour Technol; 2018 Nov; 267():249-256. PubMed ID: 30025321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Investigation of increasing organic loading rate in the co-digestion of energy crops and cow manure mix.
Comino E; Rosso M; Riggio V
Bioresour Technol; 2010 May; 101(9):3013-9. PubMed ID: 20053553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
