These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27522398)

  • 1. Intention deactivation: effects of prospective memory task similarity on aftereffects of completed intentions.
    Walser M; Goschke T; Möschl M; Fischer R
    Psychol Res; 2017 Sep; 81(5):961-981. PubMed ID: 27522398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The role of temporal delay and repeated prospective memory cue exposure on the deactivation of completed intentions.
    Walser M; Plessow F; Goschke T; Fischer R
    Psychol Res; 2014 Jul; 78(4):584-96. PubMed ID: 23918213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The failure of deactivating intentions: aftereffects of completed intentions in the repeated prospective memory cue paradigm.
    Walser M; Fischer R; Goschke T
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Jul; 38(4):1030-44. PubMed ID: 22288817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The difficulty of letting go: moderators of the deactivation of completed intentions.
    Walser M; Goschke T; Fischer R
    Psychol Res; 2014 Jul; 78(4):574-83. PubMed ID: 23934576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Acute stress shifts the balance between controlled and automatic processes in prospective memory.
    Möschl M; Walser M; Plessow F; Goschke T; Fischer R
    Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2017 Oct; 144():53-67. PubMed ID: 28625494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dissociating sub-processes of aftereffects of completed intentions and costs to the ongoing task in prospective memory: A mouse-tracking approach.
    Kurtz M; Scherbaum S; Walser M; Kanske P; Möschl M
    Mem Cognit; 2022 Oct; 50(7):1590-1613. PubMed ID: 35212979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The fate of completed intentions.
    Anderson FT; Einstein GO
    Memory; 2017 Apr; 25(4):467-480. PubMed ID: 27206804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Moving forward: Exploring the role of interference on prospective memory deactivation.
    Matos P; Albuquerque PB
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2021 Sep; 219():103395. PubMed ID: 34416502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Commission errors in delay-execute prospective memory tasks.
    Schaper P; Grundgeiger T
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Aug; 70(8):1423-1438. PubMed ID: 27172855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. When we must forget: the effect of cognitive load on prospective memory commission errors.
    Matos P; Santos FH; Albuquerque PB
    Memory; 2020 Mar; 28(3):374-385. PubMed ID: 32043427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Commission errors with forced response lag.
    Schaper P; Grundgeiger T
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Oct; 72(10):2380-2392. PubMed ID: 30862247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The role of cue salience in prospective memory commission errors in nonperformed nonfocal tasks.
    Mello B; Matos P; Albuquerque PB
    Cogn Process; 2024 Aug; 25(3):395-402. PubMed ID: 38632149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The flexible engagement of monitoring processes in non-focal and focal prospective memory tasks with salient cues.
    Hefer C; Cohen AL; Jaudas A; Dreisbach G
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2017 Sep; 179():42-53. PubMed ID: 28711672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The role of action coordination for prospective memory: Task-interruption demands affect intention realization.
    Rummel J; Wesslein AK; Meiser T
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 May; 43(5):717-735. PubMed ID: 27736115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The functional neuroanatomy of spontaneous retrieval and strategic monitoring of delayed intentions.
    Beck SM; Ruge H; Walser M; Goschke T
    Neuropsychologia; 2014 Jan; 52():37-50. PubMed ID: 24200918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Aftereffects and deactivation of completed prospective memory intentions: A systematic review.
    Möschl M; Fischer R; Bugg JM; Scullin MK; Goschke T; Walser M
    Psychol Bull; 2020 Mar; 146(3):245-278. PubMed ID: 31886687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of semantic context on prospective memory performance.
    Thomas BJ; McBride DM
    Memory; 2016; 24(3):315-23. PubMed ID: 25647351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Forgetting no-longer-relevant prospective memory intentions is (sometimes) harder with age but easier with forgetting practice.
    Bugg JM; Scullin MK; Rauvola RS
    Psychol Aging; 2016 Jun; 31(4):358-69. PubMed ID: 27064599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Effect of Implementation Intentions on Prospective Memory Commission Errors under Different Cognitive Loads.
    Guo Y; Gan J; Ding Y; Li Y
    Behav Sci (Basel); 2023 Jul; 13(7):. PubMed ID: 37504049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Context-specific prospective-memory processing: evidence for flexible attention allocation adjustments after intention encoding.
    Kuhlmann BG; Rummel J
    Mem Cognit; 2014 Aug; 42(6):943-9. PubMed ID: 24590428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.