These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27523800)

  • 1. Bayesian joint ordinal and survival modeling for breast cancer risk assessment.
    Armero C; Forné C; Rué M; Forte A; Perpiñán H; Gómez G; Baré M
    Stat Med; 2016 Dec; 35(28):5267-5282. PubMed ID: 27523800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Changes in mammographic density over time and the risk of breast cancer: An observational cohort study.
    Román M; Sala M; Baré M; Posso M; Vidal C; Louro J; Sánchez M; Peñalva L; Castells X;
    Breast; 2019 Aug; 46():108-115. PubMed ID: 31132476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Longitudinal measurement of clinical mammographic breast density to improve estimation of breast cancer risk.
    Kerlikowske K; Ichikawa L; Miglioretti DL; Buist DS; Vacek PM; Smith-Bindman R; Yankaskas B; Carney PA; Ballard-Barbash R;
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2007 Mar; 99(5):386-95. PubMed ID: 17341730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mammographic density and structural features can individually and jointly contribute to breast cancer risk assessment in mammography screening: a case-control study.
    Winkel RR; von Euler-Chelpin M; Nielsen M; Petersen K; Lillholm M; Nielsen MB; Lynge E; Uldall WY; Vejborg I
    BMC Cancer; 2016 Jul; 16():414. PubMed ID: 27387546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mammographic Density Reduction as a Prognostic Marker for Postmenopausal Breast Cancer: Results Using a Joint Longitudinal-Survival Modeling Approach.
    Andersson TM; Crowther MJ; Czene K; Hall P; Humphreys K
    Am J Epidemiol; 2017 Nov; 186(9):1065-1073. PubMed ID: 28633324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Breast cancer screening in urban Beijing, 2014-2019].
    Yang L; Zhang X; Liu S; Li HC; Zhang Q; Wang N; Ji JF
    Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2020 Sep; 54(9):974-980. PubMed ID: 32907288
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A latent class model for competing risks.
    Rowley M; Garmo H; Van Hemelrijck M; Wulaningsih W; Grundmark B; Zethelius B; Hammar N; Walldius G; Inoue M; Holmberg L; Coolen ACC
    Stat Med; 2017 Jun; 36(13):2100-2119. PubMed ID: 28233395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Extension of the association structure in joint models to include weighted cumulative effects.
    Mauff K; Steyerberg EW; Nijpels G; van der Heijden AAWA; Rizopoulos D
    Stat Med; 2017 Oct; 36(23):3746-3759. PubMed ID: 28714278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sensitivity of screening mammography by density and texture: a cohort study from a population-based screening program in Denmark.
    von Euler-Chelpin M; Lillholm M; Vejborg I; Nielsen M; Lynge E
    Breast Cancer Res; 2019 Oct; 21(1):111. PubMed ID: 31623646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bayesian joint modeling of longitudinal and spatial survival AIDS data.
    Martins R; Silva GL; Andreozzi V
    Stat Med; 2016 Aug; 35(19):3368-84. PubMed ID: 26990773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Inter-observer agreement according to three methods of evaluating mammographic density and parenchymal pattern in a case control study: impact on relative risk of breast cancer.
    Winkel RR; von Euler-Chelpin M; Nielsen M; Diao P; Nielsen MB; Uldall WY; Vejborg I
    BMC Cancer; 2015 Apr; 15():274. PubMed ID: 25884160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Risk stratification of women with false-positive test results in mammography screening based on mammographic morphology and density: A case control study.
    Winkel RR; Euler-Chelpin MV; Lynge E; Diao P; Lillholm M; Kallenberg M; Forman JL; Nielsen MB; Uldall WY; Nielsen M; Vejborg I
    Cancer Epidemiol; 2017 Aug; 49():53-60. PubMed ID: 28558329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Automated and Clinical Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System Density Measures Predict Risk for Screen-Detected and Interval Cancers: A Case-Control Study.
    Kerlikowske K; Scott CG; Mahmoudzadeh AP; Ma L; Winham S; Jensen MR; Wu FF; Malkov S; Pankratz VS; Cummings SR; Shepherd JA; Brandt KR; Miglioretti DL; Vachon CM
    Ann Intern Med; 2018 Jun; 168(11):757-765. PubMed ID: 29710124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Joint longitudinal hurdle and time-to-event models: an application related to viral load and duration of the first treatment regimen in patients with HIV initiating therapy.
    Brilleman SL; Crowther MJ; May MT; Gompels M; Abrams KR
    Stat Med; 2016 Sep; 35(20):3583-94. PubMed ID: 27027882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Breast Cancer Risk and Mammographic Density Assessed with Semiautomated and Fully Automated Methods and BI-RADS.
    Jeffers AM; Sieh W; Lipson JA; Rothstein JH; McGuire V; Whittemore AS; Rubin DL
    Radiology; 2017 Feb; 282(2):348-355. PubMed ID: 27598536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Derived mammographic masking measures based on simulated lesions predict the risk of interval cancer after controlling for known risk factors: a case-case analysis.
    Hinton B; Ma L; Mahmoudzadeh AP; Malkov S; Fan B; Greenwood H; Joe B; Lee V; Strand F; Kerlikowske K; Shepherd J
    Med Phys; 2019 Mar; 46(3):1309-1316. PubMed ID: 30697755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Joint modeling of repeated multivariate cognitive measures and competing risks of dementia and death: a latent process and latent class approach.
    Proust-Lima C; Dartigues JF; Jacqmin-Gadda H
    Stat Med; 2016 Feb; 35(3):382-98. PubMed ID: 26376900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Joint modelling of longitudinal and survival data: incorporating delayed entry and an assessment of model misspecification.
    Crowther MJ; Andersson TM; Lambert PC; Abrams KR; Humphreys K
    Stat Med; 2016 Mar; 35(7):1193-209. PubMed ID: 26514596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Measuring mammographic density: comparing a fully automated volumetric assessment versus European radiologists' qualitative classification.
    Sartor H; Lång K; Rosso A; Borgquist S; Zackrisson S; Timberg P
    Eur Radiol; 2016 Dec; 26(12):4354-4360. PubMed ID: 27011371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.