These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
355 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27524382)
1. Stability of pre-orthodontic orthognathic surgery depending on mandibular surgical techniques: SSRO vs IVRO. Choi SH; Yoo HJ; Lee JY; Jung YS; Choi JW; Lee KJ J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2016 Sep; 44(9):1209-15. PubMed ID: 27524382 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Stability of Pre-Orthodontic Orthognathic Surgery Using Intraoral Vertical Ramus Osteotomy Versus Conventional Treatment. Choi SH; Hwang CJ; Baik HS; Jung YS; Lee KJ J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Mar; 74(3):610-9. PubMed ID: 26259691 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparisons of Jaw Line and Face Line after Mandibular Setback: Intraoral Vertical Ramus versus Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomies. Chen CM; Tseng YC; Ko EC; Chen MY; Chen KJ; Cheng JH Biomed Res Int; 2018; 2018():1375085. PubMed ID: 30662900 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Postoperative stability of two common ramus osteotomy procedures for the correction of mandibular prognathism: A randomized controlled trial. Li DTS; Wang R; Wong NSM; Leung YY J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2022 Jan; 50(1):32-39. PubMed ID: 34627665 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of the quality of life changes of patients receiving sagittal split ramus osteotomy or intraoral vertical subsigmoid osteotomy for mandibular prognathism. Wong NSM; Leung YY Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Apr; 27(4):1435-1448. PubMed ID: 36881158 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Intraoral Vertical Ramus Osteotomy Results in Good Long-Term Mandibular Stability in Patients With Mandibular Prognathism and Anterior Open Bite. Choi SH; Cha JY; Park HS; Hwang CJ J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Apr; 74(4):804-10. PubMed ID: 26518527 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Long-Term Stability of Pre-Orthodontic Orthognathic Bimaxillary Surgery Using Intraoral Vertical Ramus Osteotomy Versus Conventional Surgery. Jeong JH; Choi SH; Kim KD; Hwang CJ; Lee SH; Yu HS J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Aug; 76(8):1753-1762. PubMed ID: 29549017 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Postoperative stability of bimaxillary surgery in Class III patients with mandibular protrusion and mandibular deviation: a frontal cephalometric study. Al-Gunaid T; Yamada K; Takagi R; Saito C; Saito I Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Nov; 37(11):992-8. PubMed ID: 18621507 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Relapse of skeletal class III with anterior open bite after bimaxillary orthognathic surgery depending on maxillary posterior impaction and mandibular counterclockwise rotation. Kor HS; Yang HJ; Hwang SJ J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Jul; 42(5):e230-8. PubMed ID: 24954529 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Surgical morbidities of sagittal split ramus osteotomy versus intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy for the correction of mandibular prognathism: a randomized clinical trial. Leung YY; Wang R; Wong NSM; Li DTS; Au SW; Choi WS; Su YX Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2021 Jul; 50(7):933-939. PubMed ID: 33168369 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The different effects of intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy (IVRO) and sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) on mandibular border movement. Komori H; Kawanabe N; Kataoka T; Kato Y; Fujisawa A; Yamashiro T; Kamioka H Cranio; 2018 Jul; 36(4):228-233. PubMed ID: 28436308 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Postoperative stability for surgery-first approach using intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy: 12 month follow-up. Kim JY; Jung HD; Kim SY; Park HS; Jung YS Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Jul; 52(6):539-44. PubMed ID: 24746355 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Stability of intraoral vertical ramus osteotomies for mandibular setback: a longitudinal study. Kung AYH; Leung YY Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Feb; 47(2):152-159. PubMed ID: 28966068 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Changes in border movement of the mandible in skeletal Class III before and after orthognathic surgery. Ueki K; Marukawa K; Moroi A; Sotobori M; Ishihara Y; Iguchi R; Kosaka A; Nakano Y; Higuchi M; Nakazawa R Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Feb; 43(2):213-6. PubMed ID: 23953770 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative study of skeletal stability between bicortical resorbable and titanium screw fixation after sagittal split ramus osteotomy for mandibular prognathism. Paeng JY; Hong J; Kim CS; Kim MJ J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2012 Dec; 40(8):660-4. PubMed ID: 22209495 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Change in condylar long axis and skeletal stability following sagittal split ramus osteotomy and intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy for mandibular prognathia. Ueki K; Marukawa K; Shimada M; Nakagawa K; Yamamoto E J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Oct; 63(10):1494-9. PubMed ID: 16182918 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Evaluation for vertical stability after various orthognathic surgical treatment plans for skeletal class Ⅲ malocclusion with anterior open-bite]. Xianwen L; Weijian A; Huixi Z; Yunfeng L; Shuguang L Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2017 Oct; 35(5):484-488. PubMed ID: 29188642 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Do patients treated with bimaxillary surgery have more stable condylar positions than those who have undergone single-jaw surgery? Kim YJ; Oh KM; Hong JS; Lee JH; Kim HM; Reyes M; Cevidanes LH; Park YH J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Sep; 70(9):2143-52. PubMed ID: 22115974 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Condylar and temporomandibular joint disc positions after mandibular osteotomy for prognathism. Ueki K; Marukawa K; Nakagawa K; Yamamoto E J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2002 Dec; 60(12):1424-32; discussion 1432-4. PubMed ID: 12465004 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]