These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27524432)
1. Characterizing the role of a high-volume cancer resection ecosystem on low-volume, high-quality surgical care. Kothari AN; Blanco BA; Brownlee SA; Evans AE; Chang VA; Abood GJ; Settimi R; Raicu DS; Kuo PC Surgery; 2016 Oct; 160(4):839-849. PubMed ID: 27524432 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Hospital procedure volume should not be used as a measure of surgical quality. LaPar DJ; Kron IL; Jones DR; Stukenborg GJ; Kozower BD Ann Surg; 2012 Oct; 256(4):606-15. PubMed ID: 22964735 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Hospital teaching status and outcomes of complex surgical procedures in the United States. Dimick JB; Cowan JA; Colletti LM; Upchurch GR Arch Surg; 2004 Feb; 139(2):137-41. PubMed ID: 14769569 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A decade analysis of trends and outcomes of partial versus total esophagectomy in the United States. Jafari MD; Halabi WJ; Smith BR; Nguyen VQ; Phelan MJ; Stamos MJ; Nguyen NT Ann Surg; 2013 Sep; 258(3):450-8. PubMed ID: 24022437 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Hospital esophageal cancer resection volume does not predict patient mortality risk. Kozower BD; Stukenborg GJ Ann Thorac Surg; 2012 May; 93(5):1690-6; discussion 1696-8. PubMed ID: 22541199 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Outcomes of Complex Gastrointestinal Cancer Resection at US News & World Report Top-Ranked vs Non-Ranked Hospitals. Tay E; Gambhir S; Stopenski S; Hohmann S; Smith BR; Daly S; Hinojosa MW; Nguyen NT J Am Coll Surg; 2021 Jul; 233(1):21-27.e1. PubMed ID: 33752982 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Are minimum volume standards appropriate for lung and esophageal surgery? Harrison S; Tangel V; Wu X; Christos P; Gaber-Baylis L; Turnbull Z; Port J; Altorki N; Stiles B J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2018 Jun; 155(6):2683-2694.e1. PubMed ID: 29370917 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Do cancer centers designated by the National Cancer Institute have better surgical outcomes? Birkmeyer NJ; Goodney PP; Stukel TA; Hillner BE; Birkmeyer JD Cancer; 2005 Feb; 103(3):435-41. PubMed ID: 15622523 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of Open, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Colectomies Using a Large National Database: Outcomes and Trends Related to Surgery Center Volume. Yeo HL; Isaacs AJ; Abelson JS; Milsom JW; Sedrakyan A Dis Colon Rectum; 2016 Jun; 59(6):535-42. PubMed ID: 27145311 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Short-term outcomes after esophagectomy at 164 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program hospitals: effect of operative approach and hospital-level variation. Merkow RP; Bilimoria KY; McCarter MD; Phillips JD; DeCamp MM; Sherman KL; Ko CY; Bentrem DJ Arch Surg; 2012 Nov; 147(11):1009-16. PubMed ID: 23165615 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. High volume improves outcomes: The argument for centralization of rectal cancer surgery. Aquina CT; Probst CP; Becerra AZ; Iannuzzi JC; Kelly KN; Hensley BJ; Rickles AS; Noyes K; Fleming FJ; Monson JR Surgery; 2016 Mar; 159(3):736-48. PubMed ID: 26576696 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Impact of hospital volume on operative mortality for major cancer surgery. Begg CB; Cramer LD; Hoskins WJ; Brennan MF JAMA; 1998 Nov; 280(20):1747-51. PubMed ID: 9842949 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Hospital volume and inpatient mortality after cancer-related gastrointestinal resections: the experience of an Asian country. Lin HC; Xirasagar S; Lee HC; Chai CY Ann Surg Oncol; 2006 Sep; 13(9):1182-8. PubMed ID: 16897270 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Esophageal Cancer Surgery: Spontaneous Centralization in the US Contributed to Reduce Mortality Without Causing Health Disparities. Schlottmann F; Strassle PD; Charles AG; Patti MG Ann Surg Oncol; 2018 Jun; 25(6):1580-1587. PubMed ID: 29349529 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluating popular media and internet-based hospital quality ratings for cancer surgery. Osborne NH; Ghaferi AA; Nicholas LH; Dimick JB; Mph M Arch Surg; 2011 May; 146(5):600-4. PubMed ID: 21576612 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Perioperative mortality for pancreatectomy: a national perspective. McPhee JT; Hill JS; Whalen GF; Zayaruzny M; Litwin DE; Sullivan ME; Anderson FA; Tseng JF Ann Surg; 2007 Aug; 246(2):246-53. PubMed ID: 17667503 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The 90-day mortality after pancreatectomy for cancer is double the 30-day mortality: more than 20,000 resections from the national cancer data base. Swanson RS; Pezzi CM; Mallin K; Loomis AM; Winchester DP Ann Surg Oncol; 2014 Dec; 21(13):4059-67. PubMed ID: 25190121 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mortality after esophagectomy is heavily impacted by center volume: retrospective analysis of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample. Fuchs HF; Harnsberger CR; Broderick RC; Chang DC; Sandler BJ; Jacobsen GR; Bouvet M; Horgan S Surg Endosc; 2017 Jun; 31(6):2491-2497. PubMed ID: 27660245 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Association of Discretionary Hospital Volume Standards for High-risk Cancer Surgery With Patient Outcomes and Access, 2005-2016. Sheetz KH; Chhabra KR; Smith ME; Dimick JB; Nathan H JAMA Surg; 2019 Nov; 154(11):1005-1012. PubMed ID: 31411663 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Traveling to a High-volume Center is Associated With Improved Survival for Patients With Esophageal Cancer. Speicher PJ; Englum BR; Ganapathi AM; Wang X; Hartwig MG; D'Amico TA; Berry MF Ann Surg; 2017 Apr; 265(4):743-749. PubMed ID: 28266965 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]