197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27524432)
1. Characterizing the role of a high-volume cancer resection ecosystem on low-volume, high-quality surgical care.
Kothari AN; Blanco BA; Brownlee SA; Evans AE; Chang VA; Abood GJ; Settimi R; Raicu DS; Kuo PC
Surgery; 2016 Oct; 160(4):839-849. PubMed ID: 27524432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Hospital procedure volume should not be used as a measure of surgical quality.
LaPar DJ; Kron IL; Jones DR; Stukenborg GJ; Kozower BD
Ann Surg; 2012 Oct; 256(4):606-15. PubMed ID: 22964735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Hospital teaching status and outcomes of complex surgical procedures in the United States.
Dimick JB; Cowan JA; Colletti LM; Upchurch GR
Arch Surg; 2004 Feb; 139(2):137-41. PubMed ID: 14769569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A decade analysis of trends and outcomes of partial versus total esophagectomy in the United States.
Jafari MD; Halabi WJ; Smith BR; Nguyen VQ; Phelan MJ; Stamos MJ; Nguyen NT
Ann Surg; 2013 Sep; 258(3):450-8. PubMed ID: 24022437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Hospital esophageal cancer resection volume does not predict patient mortality risk.
Kozower BD; Stukenborg GJ
Ann Thorac Surg; 2012 May; 93(5):1690-6; discussion 1696-8. PubMed ID: 22541199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Outcomes of Complex Gastrointestinal Cancer Resection at US News & World Report Top-Ranked vs Non-Ranked Hospitals.
Tay E; Gambhir S; Stopenski S; Hohmann S; Smith BR; Daly S; Hinojosa MW; Nguyen NT
J Am Coll Surg; 2021 Jul; 233(1):21-27.e1. PubMed ID: 33752982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Are minimum volume standards appropriate for lung and esophageal surgery?
Harrison S; Tangel V; Wu X; Christos P; Gaber-Baylis L; Turnbull Z; Port J; Altorki N; Stiles B
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2018 Jun; 155(6):2683-2694.e1. PubMed ID: 29370917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Do cancer centers designated by the National Cancer Institute have better surgical outcomes?
Birkmeyer NJ; Goodney PP; Stukel TA; Hillner BE; Birkmeyer JD
Cancer; 2005 Feb; 103(3):435-41. PubMed ID: 15622523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of Open, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Colectomies Using a Large National Database: Outcomes and Trends Related to Surgery Center Volume.
Yeo HL; Isaacs AJ; Abelson JS; Milsom JW; Sedrakyan A
Dis Colon Rectum; 2016 Jun; 59(6):535-42. PubMed ID: 27145311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Short-term outcomes after esophagectomy at 164 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program hospitals: effect of operative approach and hospital-level variation.
Merkow RP; Bilimoria KY; McCarter MD; Phillips JD; DeCamp MM; Sherman KL; Ko CY; Bentrem DJ
Arch Surg; 2012 Nov; 147(11):1009-16. PubMed ID: 23165615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. High volume improves outcomes: The argument for centralization of rectal cancer surgery.
Aquina CT; Probst CP; Becerra AZ; Iannuzzi JC; Kelly KN; Hensley BJ; Rickles AS; Noyes K; Fleming FJ; Monson JR
Surgery; 2016 Mar; 159(3):736-48. PubMed ID: 26576696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Impact of hospital volume on operative mortality for major cancer surgery.
Begg CB; Cramer LD; Hoskins WJ; Brennan MF
JAMA; 1998 Nov; 280(20):1747-51. PubMed ID: 9842949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Hospital volume and inpatient mortality after cancer-related gastrointestinal resections: the experience of an Asian country.
Lin HC; Xirasagar S; Lee HC; Chai CY
Ann Surg Oncol; 2006 Sep; 13(9):1182-8. PubMed ID: 16897270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Esophageal Cancer Surgery: Spontaneous Centralization in the US Contributed to Reduce Mortality Without Causing Health Disparities.
Schlottmann F; Strassle PD; Charles AG; Patti MG
Ann Surg Oncol; 2018 Jun; 25(6):1580-1587. PubMed ID: 29349529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluating popular media and internet-based hospital quality ratings for cancer surgery.
Osborne NH; Ghaferi AA; Nicholas LH; Dimick JB; Mph M
Arch Surg; 2011 May; 146(5):600-4. PubMed ID: 21576612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Perioperative mortality for pancreatectomy: a national perspective.
McPhee JT; Hill JS; Whalen GF; Zayaruzny M; Litwin DE; Sullivan ME; Anderson FA; Tseng JF
Ann Surg; 2007 Aug; 246(2):246-53. PubMed ID: 17667503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The 90-day mortality after pancreatectomy for cancer is double the 30-day mortality: more than 20,000 resections from the national cancer data base.
Swanson RS; Pezzi CM; Mallin K; Loomis AM; Winchester DP
Ann Surg Oncol; 2014 Dec; 21(13):4059-67. PubMed ID: 25190121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mortality after esophagectomy is heavily impacted by center volume: retrospective analysis of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample.
Fuchs HF; Harnsberger CR; Broderick RC; Chang DC; Sandler BJ; Jacobsen GR; Bouvet M; Horgan S
Surg Endosc; 2017 Jun; 31(6):2491-2497. PubMed ID: 27660245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Association of Discretionary Hospital Volume Standards for High-risk Cancer Surgery With Patient Outcomes and Access, 2005-2016.
Sheetz KH; Chhabra KR; Smith ME; Dimick JB; Nathan H
JAMA Surg; 2019 Nov; 154(11):1005-1012. PubMed ID: 31411663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Traveling to a High-volume Center is Associated With Improved Survival for Patients With Esophageal Cancer.
Speicher PJ; Englum BR; Ganapathi AM; Wang X; Hartwig MG; D'Amico TA; Berry MF
Ann Surg; 2017 Apr; 265(4):743-749. PubMed ID: 28266965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
