These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

250 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27524522)

  • 1. Comparative efficacy of density gradient and swim-up methods of semen preparation in intrauterine insemination cycles.
    Butt F; Chohan MA
    J Pak Med Assoc; 2016 Aug; 66(8):932-7. PubMed ID: 27524522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Semen preparation techniques for intrauterine insemination.
    Boomsma CM; Heineman MJ; Cohlen BJ; Farquhar C
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2004; (3):CD004507. PubMed ID: 15266536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Semen preparation techniques for intrauterine insemination.
    Boomsma CM; Heineman MJ; Cohlen BJ; Farquhar C
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2007 Oct; (4):CD004507. PubMed ID: 17943816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of swim-up and gradient sperm preparation techniques on deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) fragmentation in subfertile patients.
    Oguz Y; Guler I; Erdem A; Mutlu MF; Gumuslu S; Oktem M; Bozkurt N; Erdem M
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2018 Jun; 35(6):1083-1089. PubMed ID: 29572695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Semen quality before and after processing by a swim-up method: relationship to outcome of intrauterine insemination.
    Arny M; Quagliarello J
    Fertil Steril; 1987 Oct; 48(4):643-8. PubMed ID: 3653423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Preparation of oligozoospermic and/or asthenozoospermic semen for intrauterine insemination using the SpermPrep semen filtration column.
    Ohashi K; Saji F; Wakimoto A; Kato M; Tsutsui T; Tanizawa O
    Fertil Steril; 1992 Apr; 57(4):866-70. PubMed ID: 1313377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sperm swim-up: a simple and effective technique of semen processing for intrauterine insemination.
    Jameel T
    J Pak Med Assoc; 2008 Feb; 58(2):71-4. PubMed ID: 18333524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Improved sperm recovery rate with Percoll gradient method in intrauterine insemination.
    Huang HY; Lai YM; Lee CL; Chang MY; Chang SY; Soong YK
    Changgeng Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1996 Mar; 19(1):24-9. PubMed ID: 8935371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of sperm separation methods before intrauterine insemination on pregnancy outcomes and live birth rates: Differences between the swim-up and microfluidic chip techniques.
    Feyzioglu BS; Avul Z
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2023 Nov; 102(46):e36042. PubMed ID: 37986402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Improved semen qualities after continuous-step density gradient centrifugation: application to artificial insemination and pregnancy outcome.
    Sato H; Kaneko S; Kobayashi T; Oda T; Ohno T; Iizuka R
    Arch Androl; 1990; 24(1):87-93. PubMed ID: 2327816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Retrospective comparison of the semen preparation techniques for intrauterine insemination: Swim-up versus density gradient method.
    Çil N; Kabukçu C; Çabuş Ü; Turan T; Mete GA
    J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2022 Mar; 51(3):102321. PubMed ID: 35063717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sperm motility is a major determinant of pregnancy outcome following intrauterine insemination.
    Shulman A; Hauser R; Lipitz S; Frenkel Y; Dor J; Bider D; Mashiach S; Yogev L; Yavetz H
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 1998 Jul; 15(6):381-5. PubMed ID: 9673883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Semen preparation methods and sperm apoptosis: swim-up versus gradient-density centrifugation technique.
    Ricci G; Perticarari S; Boscolo R; Montico M; Guaschino S; Presani G
    Fertil Steril; 2009 Feb; 91(2):632-8. PubMed ID: 18206147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of sperm parameters on intrauterine insemination pregnancy rate.
    Akram A; Imtiaz SA; Jahan S
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2008 Jun; 18(6):342-6. PubMed ID: 18760044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sperm motility in the semen analysis affects the outcome of superovulation intrauterine insemination in the treatment of infertile Asian couples with male factor infertility.
    Lee VM; Wong JS; Loh SK; Leong NK
    BJOG; 2002 Feb; 109(2):115-20. PubMed ID: 11905427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Efficacy and pregnancy outcome of two methods of semen preparation for intrauterine insemination: a prospective randomized study.
    Morshedi M; Duran HE; Taylor S; Oehninger S
    Fertil Steril; 2003 Jun; 79 Suppl 3():1625-32. PubMed ID: 12801569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A randomized comparison of the methods of sperm preparation for intrauterine insemination.
    Dodson WC; Moessner J; Miller J; Legro RS; Gnatuk CL
    Fertil Steril; 1998 Sep; 70(3):574-5. PubMed ID: 9757895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The impact of semen processing on sperm parameters and pregnancy rates after intrauterine insemination.
    Ruiter-Ligeti J; Agbo C; Dahan M
    Minerva Ginecol; 2017 Jun; 69(3):218-224. PubMed ID: 27990794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Comparison of the methods of separating high-quality sperm for intrauterine insemination].
    She H; Dong NJ; Yuan YY
    Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2008 Nov; 14(11):1007-10. PubMed ID: 19102502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sperm enrichment from poor semen samples by double density gradient centrifugation in combination with swim-up for IVF cycles.
    Dai X; Wang Y; Cao F; Yu C; Gao T; Xia X; Wu J; Chen L
    Sci Rep; 2020 Feb; 10(1):2286. PubMed ID: 32042061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.