These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27525520)

  • 1. Tau (τ): A New Parameter to Assess the Osseointegration Potential of an Implant Surface.
    Liddell R; Ajami E; Davies JE
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2017; 32(1):102-112. PubMed ID: 27525520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Interfacial shear strength of endosseous implants.
    Butz F; Ogawa T; Nishimura I
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(4):746-51. PubMed ID: 21841983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The role of titanium implant surface modification with hydroxyapatite nanoparticles in progressive early bone-implant fixation in vivo.
    Lin A; Wang CJ; Kelly J; Gubbi P; Nishimura I
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):808-16. PubMed ID: 19865620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of surface roughness, porosity, and a resorbable calcium phosphate coating on osseointegration of titanium in a minipig model.
    Schwarz ML; Kowarsch M; Rose S; Becker K; Lenz T; Jani L
    J Biomed Mater Res A; 2009 Jun; 89(3):667-78. PubMed ID: 18442101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An experimental comparison of two different clinically used implant designs and surfaces.
    Gottlow J; Barkarmo S; Sennerby L
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 May; 14 Suppl 1():e204-12. PubMed ID: 22487460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. In vivo monitoring of the bone healing process around different titanium alloy implant surfaces placed into fresh extraction sockets.
    Colombo JS; Satoshi S; Okazaki J; Crean SJ; Sloan AJ; Waddington RJ
    J Dent; 2012 Apr; 40(4):338-46. PubMed ID: 22307025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Early-stage osseointegration capability of a submicrofeatured titanium surface created by microroughening and anodic oxidation.
    Yamada M; Ueno T; Minamikawa H; Ikeda T; Nakagawa K; Ogawa T
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Sep; 24(9):991-1001. PubMed ID: 22726210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of a predictive model for implant surface topography effects on early osseointegration in the rat tibia model.
    Abron A; Hopfensperger M; Thompson J; Cooper LF
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jan; 85(1):40-6. PubMed ID: 11174677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The roles of different scale ranges of surface implant topography on the stability of the bone/implant interface.
    Davies JE; Ajami E; Moineddin R; Mendes VC
    Biomaterials; 2013 May; 34(14):3535-46. PubMed ID: 23415644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The influence of implant design on the kinetics of osseointegration and bone anchorage homeostasis.
    Liddell RS; Ajami E; Li Y; Bajenova E; Yang Y; Davies JE
    Acta Biomater; 2021 Feb; 121():514-526. PubMed ID: 33271359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of discrete calcium phosphate nanocrystals on bone-bonding to titanium surfaces.
    Mendes VC; Moineddin R; Davies JE
    Biomaterials; 2007 Nov; 28(32):4748-55. PubMed ID: 17697709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Characterization of five different implant surfaces and their effect on osseointegration: a study in dogs.
    Coelho PG; Bonfante EA; Pessoa RS; Marin C; Granato R; Giro G; Witek L; Suzuki M
    J Periodontol; 2011 May; 82(5):742-50. PubMed ID: 21054223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of pores created by laser superfinishing on osseointegration of titanium alloy implants.
    Stangl R; Pries A; Loos B; Müller M; Erben RG
    J Biomed Mater Res A; 2004 Jun; 69(3):444-53. PubMed ID: 15127391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The influence of parathyroid hormone treatment on implant fixation.
    Daugaard H
    Dan Med Bull; 2011 Sep; 58(9):B4317. PubMed ID: 21893015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Osseointegration of titanium implants with a roughened surface containing hydride ion in a rabbit model.
    Cheng Z; Zhang F; He F; Zhang L; Guo C; Zhao S; Yang G
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Jul; 110(1):e5-12. PubMed ID: 20610295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Experimental evidence for interfacial biochemical bonding in osseointegrated titanium implants.
    Sul YT; Kwon DH; Kang BS; Oh SJ; Johansson C
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Aug; 24 Suppl A100():8-19. PubMed ID: 22093014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Early bone formation adjacent to oxidized and machined implant surfaces: a histologic study.
    Simion M; Benigni M; Al-Hezaimi K; Kim DM
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2015; 35(1):9-17. PubMed ID: 25734702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of polyelectrolyte multilayer coated titanium alloy surfaces on implant anchorage in rats.
    Zankovych S; Diefenbeck M; Bossert J; Mückley T; Schrader C; Schmidt J; Schubert H; Bischoff S; Faucon M; Finger U; Jandt KD
    Acta Biomater; 2013 Jan; 9(1):4926-34. PubMed ID: 22902814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of systemic nicotine on osseointegration of titanium implants in the rat femur.
    Berley J; Yamano S; Sukotjo C
    J Oral Implantol; 2010; 36(3):185-93. PubMed ID: 20553172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Stability evaluation of implants integrated in grafted and nongrafted maxillary bone: a clinical study from implant placement to abutment connection.
    Rasmusson L; Thor A; Sennerby L
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Mar; 14(1):61-6. PubMed ID: 20491814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.