167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27525619)
1. Quality of Information Available Via the Internet for Patients With Otological Conditions.
Danino J; Muzaffar J; Mitchell-Innes A; Howard J; Coulson C
Otol Neurotol; 2016 Sep; 37(8):1063-5. PubMed ID: 27525619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quality of information available via the internet for patients with head and neck cancer: are we improving?
Best J; Muzaffar J; Mitchell-Innes A
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Nov; 272(11):3499-505. PubMed ID: 25370600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessment of the quality of patient-oriented information over internet on testicular cancer.
Prasanth AS; Jayarajah U; Mohanappirian R; Seneviratne SA
BMC Cancer; 2018 May; 18(1):491. PubMed ID: 29716564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Adult orthodontics: a quality assessment of Internet information.
McMorrow SM; Millett DT
J Orthod; 2016 Sep; 43(3):186-92. PubMed ID: 27485895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessing the quality, reliability and readability of online health information regarding systemic lupus erythematosus.
Reynolds M; Hoi A; Buchanan RRC
Lupus; 2018 Oct; 27(12):1911-1917. PubMed ID: 30114969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quality and readability of internet-based information on halitosis.
Jo JH; Kim EJ; Kim JR; Kim MJ; Chung JW; Park JW
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2018 Mar; 125(3):215-222. PubMed ID: 29325852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The design and content of orthodontic practise websites in the UK is suboptimal and does not correlate with search ranking.
Patel A; Cobourne MT
Eur J Orthod; 2015 Aug; 37(4):447-52. PubMed ID: 25488944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Web-based information on the treatment of oral leukoplakia - quality and readability.
Wiriyakijja P; Fedele S; Porter S; Ni Riordain R
J Oral Pathol Med; 2016 Sep; 45(8):617-20. PubMed ID: 27233229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Empowerment of Parents of Children With Craniosynostosis by Objective Scoring of Patient Information Websites.
Lloyd MS; Lafferty K; Horton J; Noons P; Dover S; Evans M
J Craniofac Surg; 2016 Jun; 27(4):874-5. PubMed ID: 27192636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessment of readability, quality and popularity of online information on ureteral stents.
Mozafarpour S; Norris B; Borin J; Eisner BH
World J Urol; 2018 Jun; 36(6):985-992. PubMed ID: 29435639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Online Information on the Treatment of Burning Mouth Syndrome: Quality and Readability.
Alnafea S; Fedele S; Porter S; Ni Riordain R
J Oral Facial Pain Headache; 2017 Spring; 31(2):147-151. PubMed ID: 28437511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Glue ear: how good is the information on the World Wide Web?
Ritchie L; Tornari C; Patel PM; Lakhani R
J Laryngol Otol; 2016 Feb; 130(2):157-61. PubMed ID: 26805389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Internet-Based Resources Frequently Provide Inaccurate and Out-of-Date Recommendations on Preoperative Fasting: A Systematic Review.
Roughead T; Sewell D; Ryerson CJ; Fisher JH; Flexman AM
Anesth Analg; 2016 Dec; 123(6):1463-1468. PubMed ID: 27644057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Is the Internet a Suitable Patient Resource for Information on Common Radiological Investigations?: Radiology-Related Information on the Internet.
Bowden DJ; Yap LC; Sheppard DG
Acad Radiol; 2017 Jul; 24(7):826-830. PubMed ID: 28216191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Patient-targeted websites on overactive bladder: What are our patients reading?
Clancy AA; Hickling D; Didomizio L; Sanaee M; Shehata F; Zee R; Khalil H
Neurourol Urodyn; 2018 Feb; 37(2):832-841. PubMed ID: 28762549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dr Google - assessing the reliability and readability of information on general surgical procedures found via search engines.
Ramli R; Jambor MA; Kong CY
ANZ J Surg; 2023 Mar; 93(3):590-596. PubMed ID: 36716246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessment of the quality of Internet information on sleeve gastrectomy.
Corcelles R; Daigle CR; Talamas HR; Brethauer SA; Schauer PR
Surg Obes Relat Dis; 2015; 11(3):539-44. PubMed ID: 25604832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Readability assessment of online tracheostomy care resources.
Kong KA; Hu A
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2015 Feb; 152(2):272-8. PubMed ID: 25450410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Web-Based Information on the Treatment of Tobacco Dependence for Oral Health Professionals: Analysis of English-Written Websites.
Diniz-Freitas M; Insua A; Keat R; Fricain JC; Catros S; Monteiro L; Silva L; Lodi G; Pispero A; Albuquerque R
J Med Internet Res; 2017 Oct; 19(10):e349. PubMed ID: 29054831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluating internet health resources in ear, nose, and throat surgery.
Goslin RA; Elhassan HA
Laryngoscope; 2013 Jul; 123(7):1626-31. PubMed ID: 23720201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
