BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27526998)

  • 1. Maltodextrin and sucrose preferences in sweet-sensitive (C57BL/6J) and subsensitive (129P3/J) mice revisited.
    Ackroff K; Sclafani A
    Physiol Behav; 2016 Oct; 165():286-90. PubMed ID: 27526998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Enhanced sucrose and Polycose preference in sweet "sensitive" (C57BL/6J) and "subsensitive" (129P3/J) mice after experience with these saccharides.
    Sclafani A
    Physiol Behav; 2006 Apr; 87(4):745-56. PubMed ID: 16529783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Strain differences in sucrose- and fructose-conditioned flavor preferences in mice.
    Pinhas A; Aviel M; Koen M; Gurgov S; Acosta V; Israel M; Kakuriev L; Guskova E; Fuzailov I; Touzani K; Sclafani A; Bodnar RJ
    Physiol Behav; 2012 Jan; 105(2):451-9. PubMed ID: 21945373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sucrose motivation in sweet "sensitive" (C57BL/6J) and "subsensitive" (129P3/J) mice measured by progressive ratio licking.
    Sclafani A
    Physiol Behav; 2006 Apr; 87(4):734-44. PubMed ID: 16530236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Oral, post-oral and genetic interactions in sweet appetite.
    Sclafani A
    Physiol Behav; 2006 Nov; 89(4):525-30. PubMed ID: 16647093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fat and sugar flavor preference and acceptance in C57BL/6J and 129 mice: experience attenuates strain differences.
    Sclafani A
    Physiol Behav; 2007 Mar; 90(4):602-11. PubMed ID: 17210165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Profound differences in fat versus carbohydrate preferences in CAST/EiJ and C57BL/6J mice: Role of fat taste.
    Sclafani A; Vural AS; Ackroff K
    Physiol Behav; 2018 Oct; 194():348-355. PubMed ID: 29933030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sugar-induced cephalic-phase insulin release is mediated by a T1r2+T1r3-independent taste transduction pathway in mice.
    Glendinning JI; Stano S; Holter M; Azenkot T; Goldman O; Margolskee RF; Vasselli JR; Sclafani A
    Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol; 2015 Sep; 309(5):R552-60. PubMed ID: 26157055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. T1R2 and T1R3 subunits are individually unnecessary for normal affective licking responses to Polycose: implications for saccharide taste receptors in mice.
    Treesukosol Y; Blonde GD; Spector AC
    Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol; 2009 Apr; 296(4):R855-65. PubMed ID: 19158407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Maltodextrin Acceptance and Preference in Eight Mouse Strains.
    Poole RL; Aleman TR; Ellis HT; Tordoff MG
    Chem Senses; 2016 Jan; 41(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 26464499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Flavor preferences conditioned by nutritive and non-nutritive sweeteners in mice.
    Sclafani A; Ackroff K
    Physiol Behav; 2017 May; 173():188-199. PubMed ID: 28192132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The relative affective potency of glycine, L-serine and sucrose as assessed by a brief-access taste test in inbred strains of mice.
    Dotson CD; Spector AC
    Chem Senses; 2004 Jul; 29(6):489-98. PubMed ID: 15269121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The rat's acceptance and preference for sucrose, maltodextrin, and saccharin solutions and mixtures.
    Sclafani A; Thompson B; Smith JC
    Physiol Behav; 1998 Feb; 63(4):499-503. PubMed ID: 9523890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sweetener preference of C57BL/6ByJ and 129P3/J mice.
    Bachmanov AA; Tordoff MG; Beauchamp GK
    Chem Senses; 2001 Sep; 26(7):905-13. PubMed ID: 11555485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Flavor preference conditioning by different sugars in sweet ageusic Trpm5 knockout mice.
    Sclafani A; Ackroff K
    Physiol Behav; 2015 Mar; 140():156-63. PubMed ID: 25497884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Differential effects of sucrose and fructose on dietary obesity in four mouse strains.
    Glendinning JI; Breinager L; Kyrillou E; Lacuna K; Rocha R; Sclafani A
    Physiol Behav; 2010 Oct; 101(3):331-43. PubMed ID: 20600198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Species differences in polysaccharide and sugar taste preferences.
    Feigin MB; Sclafani A; Sunday SR
    Neurosci Biobehav Rev; 1987; 11(2):231-40. PubMed ID: 3614791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Contribution of orosensory stimulation to strain differences in oil intake by mice.
    Glendinning JI; Feld N; Goodman L; Bayor R
    Physiol Behav; 2008 Oct; 95(3):476-83. PubMed ID: 18691606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Detection of maltodextrin and its discrimination from sucrose are independent of the T1R2 + T1R3 heterodimer.
    Smith KR; Spector AC
    Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol; 2017 Oct; 313(4):R450-R462. PubMed ID: 28768658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ethanol consumption and taste preferences in C57BL/6ByJ and 129/J mice.
    Bachmanov AA; Tordoff MG; Beauchamp GK
    Alcohol Clin Exp Res; 1996 Apr; 20(2):201-6. PubMed ID: 8730208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.