These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2752704)
1. Intuitive reasoning about probability: theoretical and experimental analyses of the "problem of three prisoners". Shimojo S; Ichikawa SI Cognition; 1989 Jun; 32(1):1-24. PubMed ID: 2752704 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Base rates: both neglected and intuitive. Pennycook G; Trippas D; Handley SJ; Thompson VA J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Mar; 40(2):544-54. PubMed ID: 24219086 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. When intuitive Bayesians need to be good readers: The problem-wording effect on Bayesian reasoning. Sirota M; Navarrete G; Juanchich M Cognition; 2024 Apr; 245():105722. PubMed ID: 38309041 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A closer look at the probabilities of the notorious three prisoners. Falk R Cognition; 1992 Jun; 43(3):197-223. PubMed ID: 1643813 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Facilitating normative judgments of conditional probability: frequency or nested sets? Yamagishi K Exp Psychol; 2003; 50(2):97-106. PubMed ID: 12693194 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Representation facilitates reasoning: what natural frequencies are and what they are not. Hoffrage U; Gigerenzer G; Krauss S; Martignon L Cognition; 2002 Jul; 84(3):343-52. PubMed ID: 12044739 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Précis of bayesian rationality: The probabilistic approach to human reasoning. Oaksford M; Chater N Behav Brain Sci; 2009 Feb; 32(1):69-84; discussion 85-120. PubMed ID: 19210833 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Asymmetries in predictive and diagnostic reasoning. Fernbach PM; Darlow A; Sloman SA J Exp Psychol Gen; 2011 May; 140(2):168-85. PubMed ID: 21219081 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Typicality and reasoning fallacies. Shafir EB; Smith EE; Osherson DN Mem Cognit; 1990 May; 18(3):229-39. PubMed ID: 2355854 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. When does information about causal structure improve statistical reasoning? McNair S; Feeney A Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(4):625-45. PubMed ID: 23931633 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Now you Bayes, now you don't: effects of set-problem and frequency-format mental representations on statistical reasoning. Sirota M; Kostovičová L; Vallée-Tourangeau F Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Oct; 22(5):1465-73. PubMed ID: 25711182 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Bayes and blickets: effects of knowledge on causal induction in children and adults. Griffiths TL; Sobel DM; Tenenbaum JB; Gopnik A Cogn Sci; 2011; 35(8):1407-55. PubMed ID: 21972897 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Theory-based Bayesian models of inductive learning and reasoning. Tenenbaum JB; Griffiths TL; Kemp C Trends Cogn Sci; 2006 Jul; 10(7):309-18. PubMed ID: 16797219 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Another chance for good reasoning. Pighin S; Tentori K; Girotto V Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Dec; 24(6):1995-2002. PubMed ID: 28265865 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Asking better questions: How presentation formats influence information search. Wu CM; Meder B; Filimon F; Nelson JD J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Aug; 43(8):1274-1297. PubMed ID: 28318286 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Within-subject consistency and between-subject variability in Bayesian reasoning strategies. Cohen AL; Staub A Cogn Psychol; 2015 Sep; 81():26-47. PubMed ID: 26354671 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Chances and frequencies in probabilistic reasoning: rejoinder to Hoffrage, Gigerenzer, Krauss, and Martignon. Girotto V; Gonzalez M Cognition; 2002 Jul; 84(3):353-9. PubMed ID: 12044740 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The role of causal models in multiple judgments under uncertainty. Hayes BK; Hawkins GE; Newell BR; Pasqualino M; Rehder B Cognition; 2014 Dec; 133(3):611-20. PubMed ID: 25238316 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]