These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
500 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27527072)
1. Apparent diffusion coefficient measurement in glioma: Influence of region-of-interest determination methods on apparent diffusion coefficient values, interobserver variability, time efficiency, and diagnostic ability. Han X; Suo S; Sun Y; Zu J; Qu J; Zhou Y; Chen Z; Xu J J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Mar; 45(3):722-730. PubMed ID: 27527072 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurement in endometrial carcinoma: effect of region of interest methods on ADC values. Inoue C; Fujii S; Kaneda S; Fukunaga T; Kaminou T; Kigawa J; Harada T; Ogawa T J Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Jul; 40(1):157-61. PubMed ID: 24677497 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of two region-of-interest placement methods for histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient maps for glioma grading. Hieu ND; Hung ND; Hung ND; Hien MM; Anh DV; Dung LT Clin Ter; 2024; 175(3):128-136. PubMed ID: 38767069 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurement in ovarian tumor: Effect of region-of-interest methods on ADC values and diagnostic ability. Mukuda N; Fujii S; Inoue C; Fukunaga T; Tanabe Y; Itamochi H; Ogawa T J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Mar; 43(3):720-5. PubMed ID: 26201495 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Correlation Between Apparent Diffusion Coefficient and the Ki-67 Proliferation Index in Grading Pediatric Glioma. Yao R; Cheng A; Zhang Z; Jin B; Yu H J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2023 Mar-Apr 01; 47(2):322-328. PubMed ID: 36957971 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurements in pancreatic adenocarcinoma: A preliminary study of the effect of region of interest on ADC values and interobserver variability. Ma C; Liu L; Li J; Wang L; Chen LG; Zhang Y; Chen SY; Lu JP J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Feb; 43(2):407-13. PubMed ID: 26182908 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Diffusion-weighted quantitative MRI of pleural abnormalities: Intra- and interobserver variability in the apparent diffusion coefficient measurements. Priola AM; Priola SM; Gned D; Giraudo MT; Brundu M; Righi L; Veltri A J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Sep; 46(3):769-782. PubMed ID: 28117923 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Glioma grading using apparent diffusion coefficient map: application of histogram analysis based on automatic segmentation. Lee J; Choi SH; Kim JH; Sohn CH; Lee S; Jeong J NMR Biomed; 2014 Sep; 27(9):1046-52. PubMed ID: 25042540 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Grading diffuse gliomas without intense contrast enhancement by amide proton transfer MR imaging: comparisons with diffusion- and perfusion-weighted imaging. Togao O; Hiwatashi A; Yamashita K; Kikuchi K; Keupp J; Yoshimoto K; Kuga D; Yoneyama M; Suzuki SO; Iwaki T; Takahashi M; Iihara K; Honda H Eur Radiol; 2017 Feb; 27(2):578-588. PubMed ID: 27003139 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Diffusion Weighted Imaging for Differentiating Benign from Malignant Orbital Tumors: Diagnostic Performance of the Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Based on Region of Interest Selection Method. Xu XQ; Hu H; Su GY; Liu H; Shi HB; Wu FY Korean J Radiol; 2016; 17(5):650-6. PubMed ID: 27587953 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Grading of Glioma: combined diagnostic value of amide proton transfer weighted, arterial spin labeling and diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Kang XW; Xi YB; Liu TT; Wang N; Zhu YQ; Wang XR; Guo F BMC Med Imaging; 2020 May; 20(1):50. PubMed ID: 32408867 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Diagnostic value of apparent diffusion coefficient in differentiating between high-grade gliomas and brain metastases. Caravan I; Ciortea CA; Contis A; Lebovici A Acta Radiol; 2018 May; 59(5):599-605. PubMed ID: 28835111 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Gliomas: Histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient maps with standard- or high-b-value diffusion-weighted MR imaging--correlation with tumor grade. Kang Y; Choi SH; Kim YJ; Kim KG; Sohn CH; Kim JH; Yun TJ; Chang KH Radiology; 2011 Dec; 261(3):882-90. PubMed ID: 21969667 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Preoperative grading of supratentorial nonenhancing gliomas by high b-value diffusion-weighted 3 T magnetic resonance imaging. Han H; Han C; Wu X; Zhong S; Zhuang X; Tan G; Wu H J Neurooncol; 2017 May; 133(1):147-154. PubMed ID: 28439776 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Interobserver variability of selective region-of-interest measurement protocols for quantitative diffusion weighted imaging in soft tissue masses: Comparison with whole tumor volume measurements. Ahlawat S; Khandheria P; Del Grande F; Morelli J; Subhawong TK; Demehri S; Fayad LM J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Feb; 43(2):446-54. PubMed ID: 26174705 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging analysis of diffusion and microperfusion in grading gliomas and comparison with arterial spin labeling for evaluation of tumor perfusion. Shen N; Zhao L; Jiang J; Jiang R; Su C; Zhang S; Tang X; Zhu W J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Sep; 44(3):620-32. PubMed ID: 26880230 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Whole-lesion ADC histogram analysis versus single-slice ADC measurement for the differentiation of benign and malignant soft tissue tumors. Ozturk M; Polat AV; Selcuk MB Eur J Radiol; 2021 Oct; 143():109934. PubMed ID: 34500411 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Grading of Gliomas by Using Monoexponential, Biexponential, and Stretched Exponential Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging and Diffusion Kurtosis MR Imaging. Bai Y; Lin Y; Tian J; Shi D; Cheng J; Haacke EM; Hong X; Ma B; Zhou J; Wang M Radiology; 2016 Feb; 278(2):496-504. PubMed ID: 26230975 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Apparent diffusion coefficient measurements in diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of the anterior mediastinum: inter-observer reproducibility of five different methods of region-of-interest positioning. Priola AM; Priola SM; Parlatano D; Gned D; Giraudo MT; Giardino R; Ferrero B; Ardissone F; Veltri A Eur Radiol; 2017 Apr; 27(4):1386-1394. PubMed ID: 27516357 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]