92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2752723)
1. Computer-managed call and recall for cervical screening: a typology of reasons for non-attendance.
Elkind A; Eardley A; Haran D; Spencer B; Smith A
Community Med; 1989 May; 11(2):157-62. PubMed ID: 2752723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reasons for non-attendance for computer-managed cervical screening: pilot interviews.
Elkind AK; Haran D; Eardley A; Spencer B
Soc Sci Med; 1988; 27(6):651-60. PubMed ID: 3227371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cervical screening: what are the communication problems?
Haran D; Eardley A; Elkind AK; Spencer B; Smith A
Public Health; 1989 Mar; 103(2):99-104. PubMed ID: 2727242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Preliminary results of a general practice based call system for cervical cancer screening in The Netherlands.
Palm BT; Kant AC; van den Bosch WJ; Vooijs GP; van Weel C
Br J Gen Pract; 1993 Dec; 43(377):503-6. PubMed ID: 8312021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Well you can come in but i'm not having it. The role of the health visitor in computer-managed cervical screening.
Elkind AK; Haran D; Eardley A; Spencer B
Health Visit; 1989 Jan; 62(1):20-1. PubMed ID: 2914770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Exploring age differences in reasons for nonattendance for cervical screening: a qualitative study.
Waller J; Jackowska M; Marlow L; Wardle J
BJOG; 2012 Jan; 119(1):26-32. PubMed ID: 21668764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Trends in the organization of cervical cancer screening.
Haran D; Eardley A; Elkind A; Spencer B; Smith A
J R Soc Health; 1990 Feb; 110(1):17-9. PubMed ID: 2107310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of scheduled appointments on cervical screening participation in Norway: a randomised intervention.
Lönnberg S; Andreassen T; Engesæter B; Lilleng R; Kleven C; Skare A; Johansson K; Fredheim CS; Tropé A
BMJ Open; 2016 Nov; 6(11):e013728. PubMed ID: 28186949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Health authority cervical screening recall policies and time since last smear: a retrospective cohort analysis in the north west England.
Howe A; Owen-Smith V; Richardson J
J Med Screen; 2003; 10(4):184-8. PubMed ID: 14746327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The efficacy of a national Family Health Services Authority based cervical cytology system.
Amery J; Beardow R; Oerton J; Victor C
Health Trends; 1992; 24(4):119-22. PubMed ID: 10123981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cancer prevention in primary care. Screening for cervical cancer.
Austoker J
BMJ; 1994 Jul; 309(6949):241-8. PubMed ID: 7980803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Women's lay knowledge of cervical cancer/cervical screening: accounting for non-attendance at cervical screening clinics.
Neilson A; Jones RK
J Adv Nurs; 1998 Sep; 28(3):571-5. PubMed ID: 9756225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Attendance rate in the Polish Cervical Cancer Screening Program in the years 2007-2009].
Spaczyński M; Karowicz-Bilinska A; Rokita W; Molińska-Glura M; Januszek-Michalecka L; Seroczyński P; Uchlik J; Nowak-Markwitz E
Ginekol Pol; 2010 Sep; 81(9):655-63. PubMed ID: 20973201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of use of vaginal HPV self-sampling and offering flexible appointments as strategies to reach long-term non-attending women in organized cervical screening.
Darlin L; Borgfeldt C; Forslund O; Hénic E; Hortlund M; Dillner J; Kannisto P
J Clin Virol; 2013 Sep; 58(1):155-60. PubMed ID: 23867008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of a pilot study for breast and cervical cancer screening with Bradford's minority ethnic women; a community development approach, 1991-93.
Kernohan EE
Br J Cancer Suppl; 1996 Sep; 29():S42-6. PubMed ID: 8782798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cervical screening in general practice: call and recall.
Ridsdale LL
J R Coll Gen Pract; 1987 Jun; 37(299):257-9. PubMed ID: 3129556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A computer-managed call and recall system for cervical screening.
Haran D; Hobbs P; Pendleton LL; Elkind A; Eardley A; Spencer B
Public Health; 1986 Mar; 100(2):105-15. PubMed ID: 3737849
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Attendance to cervical cancer screening in family practices in The Netherlands.
Hermens RP; Tacken MA; Hulscher ME; Braspenning JC; Grol RP
Prev Med; 2000 Jan; 30(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 10642458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. General practitioner based screening for cervical cancer: higher participation of women with a higher risk?
Kant AC; Palm BT; Wentink E; van Weel C
J Med Screen; 1997; 4(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 9200061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Study protocol for the most effective recall method in a cervical cancer screening program in Klang, Malaysia.
Abdul Rashid RM; Dahlui M
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2013; 14(10):5867-70. PubMed ID: 24289591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
