These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27528013)
1. Common methods for fecal sample storage in field studies yield consistent signatures of individual identity in microbiome sequencing data. Blekhman R; Tang K; Archie EA; Barreiro LB; Johnson ZP; Wilson ME; Kohn J; Yuan ML; Gesquiere L; Grieneisen LE; Tung J Sci Rep; 2016 Aug; 6():31519. PubMed ID: 27528013 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessment of the impact of different fecal storage protocols on the microbiota diversity and composition: a pilot study. Moossavi S; Engen PA; Ghanbari R; Green SJ; Naqib A; Bishehsari F; Merat S; Poustchi H; Keshavarzian A; Malekzadeh R BMC Microbiol; 2019 Jun; 19(1):145. PubMed ID: 31253096 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Systematic Analysis of Impact of Sampling Regions and Storage Methods on Fecal Gut Microbiome and Metabolome Profiles. Liang Y; Dong T; Chen M; He L; Wang T; Liu X; Chang H; Mao JH; Hang B; Snijders AM; Xia Y mSphere; 2020 Jan; 5(1):. PubMed ID: 31915218 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of Methods To Collect Fecal Samples for Microbiome Studies Using Whole-Genome Shotgun Metagenomic Sequencing. Byrd DA; Sinha R; Hoffman KL; Chen J; Hua X; Shi J; Chia N; Petrosino J; Vogtmann E mSphere; 2020 Feb; 5(1):. PubMed ID: 32250964 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of Stool Sample Preservation Methods on Gut Microbiota Biodiversity: New Original Data and Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis. Li XM; Shi X; Yao Y; Shen YC; Wu XL; Cai T; Liang LX; Wang F Microbiol Spectr; 2023 Jun; 11(3):e0429722. PubMed ID: 37093040 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of Fecal Collection Methods on Variation in Gut Metagenomics and Untargeted Metabolomics. Guan H; Pu Y; Liu C; Lou T; Tan S; Kong M; Sun Z; Mei Z; Qi Q; Quan Z; Zhao G; Zheng Y mSphere; 2021 Oct; 6(5):e0063621. PubMed ID: 34523982 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Interpersonal Variations in Gut Microbiota Profiles Supersedes the Effects of Differing Fecal Storage Conditions. Bundgaard-Nielsen C; Hagstrøm S; Sørensen S Sci Rep; 2018 Nov; 8(1):17367. PubMed ID: 30478355 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of preservation method on spider monkey (Ateles geoffroyi) fecal microbiota over 8 weeks. Hale VL; Tan CL; Knight R; Amato KR J Microbiol Methods; 2015 Jun; 113():16-26. PubMed ID: 25819008 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reliability of a participant-friendly fecal collection method for microbiome analyses: a step towards large sample size investigation. Szopinska JW; Gresse R; van der Marel S; Boekhorst J; Lukovac S; van Swam I; Franke B; Timmerman H; Belzer C; Arias Vasquez A BMC Microbiol; 2018 Sep; 18(1):110. PubMed ID: 30189859 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of Sample Preservation and Storage Methods for Metaproteomics Analysis of Intestinal Microbiomes. Mordant A; Kleiner M Microbiol Spectr; 2021 Dec; 9(3):e0187721. PubMed ID: 34908431 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of storage methods for gut microbiome studies in teleosts: Insights from rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Hildonen M; Kodama M; Puetz LC; Gilbert MTP; Limborg MT J Microbiol Methods; 2019 May; 160():42-48. PubMed ID: 30885689 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Storage and handling of human faecal samples affect the gut microbiome composition: A feasibility study. Ezzy AC; Hagstrom AD; George C; Hamlin AS; Pereg L; Murphy AJ; Winter G J Microbiol Methods; 2019 Sep; 164():105668. PubMed ID: 31302202 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of field conditions on fecal microbiota. Hale VL; Tan CL; Niu K; Yang Y; Cui D; Zhao H; Knight R; Amato KR J Microbiol Methods; 2016 Nov; 130():180-188. PubMed ID: 27686380 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Improving the standards for gut microbiome analysis of fecal samples: insights from the field biology of Japanese macaques on Yakushima Island. Hayakawa T; Sawada A; Tanabe AS; Fukuda S; Kishida T; Kurihara Y; Matsushima K; Liu J; Akomo-Okoue EF; Gravena W; Kashima M; Suzuki M; Kadowaki K; Suzumura T; Inoue E; Sugiura H; Hanya G; Agata K Primates; 2018 Sep; 59(5):423-436. PubMed ID: 29942984 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Collection of non-meconium stool on fecal occult blood cards is an effective method for fecal microbiota studies in infants. Wong WSW; Clemency N; Klein E; Provenzano M; Iyer R; Niederhuber JE; Hourigan SK Microbiome; 2017 Sep; 5(1):114. PubMed ID: 28870234 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Performance comparison of fecal preservative and stock solutions for gut microbiome storage at room temperature. Park C; Yun KE; Chu JM; Lee JY; Hong CP; Nam YD; Jeong J; Han K; Ahn YJ J Microbiol; 2020 Aug; 58(8):703-710. PubMed ID: 32583287 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Methods for Improving Human Gut Microbiome Data by Reducing Variability through Sample Processing and Storage of Stool. Gorzelak MA; Gill SK; Tasnim N; Ahmadi-Vand Z; Jay M; Gibson DL PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0134802. PubMed ID: 26252519 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluating gut microbiota profiles from archived fecal samples. Rounge TB; Meisal R; Nordby JI; Ambur OH; de Lange T; Hoff G BMC Gastroenterol; 2018 Nov; 18(1):171. PubMed ID: 30409123 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of room temperature transport vials on DNA quality and phylogenetic composition of faecal microbiota of elderly adults and infants. Hill CJ; Brown JR; Lynch DB; Jeffery IB; Ryan CA; Ross RP; Stanton C; O'Toole PW Microbiome; 2016 May; 4(1):19. PubMed ID: 27160322 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative methods for fecal sample storage to preserve gut microbial structure and function in an in vitro model of the human colon. Deschamps C; Fournier E; Uriot O; Lajoie F; Verdier C; Comtet-Marre S; Thomas M; Kapel N; Cherbuy C; Alric M; Almeida M; Etienne-Mesmin L; Blanquet-Diot S Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2020 Dec; 104(23):10233-10247. PubMed ID: 33085024 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]