These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
694 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27528482)
1. Emission factors of air pollutants from CNG-gasoline bi-fuel vehicles: Part I. Black carbon. Wang Y; Xing Z; Xu H; Du K Sci Total Environ; 2016 Dec; 572():1161-1165. PubMed ID: 27528482 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Emission factors of air pollutants from CNG-gasoline bi-fuel vehicles: Part II. CO, HC and NOx. Huang X; Wang Y; Xing Z; Du K Sci Total Environ; 2016 Sep; 565():698-705. PubMed ID: 27219504 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of the emission factors of air pollutants from gasoline, CNG, LPG and diesel fueled vehicles at idle speed. Aosaf MR; Wang Y; Du K Environ Pollut; 2022 Jul; 305():119296. PubMed ID: 35427677 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Are emissions of black carbon from gasoline vehicles overestimated? Real-time, in situ measurement of black carbon emission factors. Wang Y; Xing Z; Zhao S; Zheng M; Mu C; Du K Sci Total Environ; 2016 Mar; 547():422-428. PubMed ID: 26799329 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. On-road mileage-based emission factors of gaseous pollutants from bi-fuel taxi fleets in China: The influence of fuel type, vehicle speed, and accumulated mileage. Wang Y; Xing Z; Zhang H; Wang Y; Du K Sci Total Environ; 2022 May; 819():151999. PubMed ID: 34843772 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Characteristics of black carbon emissions from in-use light-duty passenger vehicles. Zheng X; Zhang S; Wu Y; Zhang KM; Wu X; Li Z; Hao J Environ Pollut; 2017 Dec; 231(Pt 1):348-356. PubMed ID: 28810204 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quantifying on-road emissions from gasoline-powered motor vehicles: accounting for the presence of medium- and heavy-duty diesel trucks. Dallmann TR; Kirchstetter TW; DeMartini SJ; Harley RA Environ Sci Technol; 2013 Dec; 47(23):13873-81. PubMed ID: 24215572 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Investigating the real-world emission characteristics of light-duty gasoline vehicles and their relationship to local socioeconomic conditions in three communities in Los Angeles, California. Park SS; Vijayan A; Mara SL; Herner JD J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2016 Oct; 66(10):1031-44. PubMed ID: 27268732 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Real-world emissions of in-use off-road vehicles in Mexico. Zavala M; Huertas JI; Prato D; Jazcilevich A; Aguilar A; Balam M; Misra C; Molina LT J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2017 Sep; 67(9):958-972. PubMed ID: 28379119 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Benefits of near-zero freight: The air quality and health impacts of low-NO Mac Kinnon M; Zhu S; Cervantes A; Dabdub D; Samuelsen GS J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2021 Nov; 71(11):1428-1444. PubMed ID: 34287106 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluating the Effects of Aromatics Content in Gasoline on Gaseous and Particulate Matter Emissions from SI-PFI and SIDI Vehicles. Karavalakis G; Short D; Vu D; Russell R; Hajbabaei M; Asa-Awuku A; Durbin TD Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Jun; 49(11):7021-31. PubMed ID: 25938171 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Climate and health relevant emissions from in-use Indian three-wheelers fueled by natural gas and gasoline. Reynolds CC; Grieshop AP; Kandlikar M Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Mar; 45(6):2406-12. PubMed ID: 21322628 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A life-cycle comparison of alternative automobile fuels. MacLean HL; Lave LB; Lankey R; Joshi S J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2000 Oct; 50(10):1769-79. PubMed ID: 11288305 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of real-world emissions of China V heavy-duty vehicles fueled by diesel, CNG and LNG on various road types. Zheng F; Zhang H; Yin H; Fu M; Jiang H; Li J; Ding Y Chemosphere; 2022 Sep; 303(Pt 2):135137. PubMed ID: 35644238 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Real-world fuel use and gaseous emission rates for flex fuel vehicles operated on E85 versus gasoline. Delavarrafiee M; Frey HC J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2018 Mar; 68(3):235-254. PubMed ID: 29215964 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of flexible fuel vehicle and life-cycle fuel consumption and emissions of selected pollutants and greenhouse gases for ethanol 85 versus gasoline. Zhai H; Frey HC; Rouphail NM; Gonçalves GA; Farias TL J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2009 Aug; 59(8):912-24. PubMed ID: 19728485 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of CO Lv Z; Wu L; Ma C; Sun L; Peng J; Yang L; Wei N; Zhang Q; Mao H Sci Total Environ; 2023 Feb; 858(Pt 2):159966. PubMed ID: 36347281 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Energy demand and emissions of a passenger vehicle fueled with CNG, gasohol, hydrous ethanol and wet ethanol based on the key points of the WLTC. Hatschbach LS; Mazer MFP; Dos Santos IR; Dalla Nora M Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Mar; 29(13):19054-19071. PubMed ID: 34709545 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessment of environmentally friendly fuel emissions from in-use vehicle exhaust: low-blend iso-stoichiometric GEM mixture as example. Schifter I; Díaz-Gutiérrez L; Rodríguez-Lara R; González-Macías C; González-Macías U Environ Monit Assess; 2017 May; 189(5):243. PubMed ID: 28456921 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. On-road emissions of passenger cars beyond the boundary conditions of the real-driving emissions test. Suarez-Bertoa R; Valverde V; Clairotte M; Pavlovic J; Giechaskiel B; Franco V; Kregar Z; Astorga C Environ Res; 2019 Sep; 176():108572. PubMed ID: 31377567 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]