146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27530007)
41. [Brainstem auditory evoked potentials in patients with multiple sclerosis--use of 2 stimulation frequencies].
Plasová V; Urban P
Cesk Neurol Neurochir; 1990 Nov; 53(6):386-95. PubMed ID: 2261649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Brain-stem auditory evoked potentials in the common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus).
Harada T; Tokuriki M
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1997 Jan; 104(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 9076252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Evaluation of waveform, latency and amplitude values of chirp ABR in newborns.
Cebulla M; Lurz H; Shehata-Dieler W
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2014 Apr; 78(4):631-6. PubMed ID: 24529909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Auditory changes in mobile users: is evidence forthcoming?
Panda NK; Modi R; Munjal S; Virk RS
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2011 Apr; 144(4):581-5. PubMed ID: 21493239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. [Auditory-evoked responses to a monaural or a binaural click, recorded from the vertex, as in two temporal derivations; effect of interaural time differences (author's transl)].
Botte MC; Chocholle R
Audiology; 1976; 15(1):50-62. PubMed ID: 1252190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. [Right hemispheric dominancy in the auditory evoked magnetic fields for pure-tone stimuli].
Kanno A; Nakasato N; Fujiwara S; Yoshimoto T
No To Shinkei; 1996 Mar; 48(3):240-4. PubMed ID: 8868334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. The sensitivity of human event-related potentials and reaction time to mobile phone emitted electromagnetic fields.
Hamblin DL; Croft RJ; Wood AW; Stough C; Spong J
Bioelectromagnetics; 2006 May; 27(4):265-73. PubMed ID: 16437544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Functional status of auditory pathways in hypothyroidism: evoked potential study.
Anjana Y; Vaney N; Tandon OP; Madhu SV
Indian J Physiol Pharmacol; 2006; 50(4):341-9. PubMed ID: 17402263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Contribution from crossed and uncrossed brainstem structures to the brainstem auditory evoked potentials: a study in humans.
Møller AR; Jho HD; Yokota M; Jannetta PJ
Laryngoscope; 1995 Jun; 105(6):596-605. PubMed ID: 7769942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. [Brainstem auditory evoked potentials in neonatology: the method and results in a group of normal newborns].
Pasanisi E; Bacciu S; Fava G; Dallatomasina M; Bacciu A; Negri M; Piazza F; Montali S
Acta Biomed Ateneo Parmense; 1996; 67(5-6):191-5. PubMed ID: 10021703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Brainstem auditory evoked potentials in experimentally-induced bovine spongiform encephalopathy.
Arai S; Matsui Y; Fukuda S; Okada H; Onoe S
Res Vet Sci; 2009 Aug; 87(1):111-4. PubMed ID: 19101002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. [Study of brainstem auditory evoked potentials and its correlation with pontine volume in olivopontocerebellar atrophy].
Mao SY; Huang JZ; Ding MP
Zhongguo Ying Yong Sheng Li Xue Za Zhi; 2007 Aug; 23(3):324-7. PubMed ID: 21162276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Thirty minutes mobile phone use has no short-term adverse effects on central auditory pathways.
Arai N; Enomoto H; Okabe S; Yuasa K; Kamimura Y; Ugawa Y
Clin Neurophysiol; 2003 Aug; 114(8):1390-4. PubMed ID: 12888020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Effects of mobile phone exposure on time frequency fine structure of transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions.
Paglialonga A; Tognola G; Parazzini M; Lutman ME; Bell SL; Thuroczy G; Ravazzani P
J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Oct; 122(4):2174-82. PubMed ID: 17902853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. [Visual and auditory evoked potentials parameters in multiple sclerosis in children].
Steczkowska M; Kaciński M; Kroczka S
Przegl Lek; 2010; 67(9):706-9. PubMed ID: 21387809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. [Evaluation of the effect of auditory fatigue on the human ear based on the measurement of brain stem auditory potentials (ABR). II. Relation of temporary auditory threshold shift and changes in the latency of wave V].
Janczewski G; Kochanek K; Dawidowicz J; Dobrzyński P; Checiński P
Med Pr; 1988; 39(3):170-4. PubMed ID: 3226285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Preattentive auditory information processing under exposure to the 902 MHz GSM mobile phone electromagnetic field: a mismatch negativity (MMN) study.
Kwon MS; Kujala T; Huotilainen M; Shestakova A; Näätänen R; Hämäläinen H
Bioelectromagnetics; 2009 Apr; 30(3):241-8. PubMed ID: 19140136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Effects of stimulus presentation mode and subcortical laterality in speech-evoked auditory brainstem responses.
Ahadi M; Pourbakht A; Jafari AH; Jalaie S
Int J Audiol; 2014 Apr; 53(4):243-9. PubMed ID: 24506562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. A study on the effect of prolonged mobile phone use on pure tone audiometry thresholds of medical students of Sikkim.
Das S; Chakraborty S; Mahanta B
J Postgrad Med; 2017; 63(4):221-225. PubMed ID: 28272071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Examining the effects of electromagnetic fields emitted by GSM mobile phones on human event-related potentials and performance during an auditory task.
Hamblin DL; Wood AW; Croft RJ; Stough C
Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Jan; 115(1):171-8. PubMed ID: 14706485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
