BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

620 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27530070)

  • 1. Optimizing EUS-guided liver biopsy sampling: comprehensive assessment of needle types and tissue acquisition techniques.
    Schulman AR; Thompson CC; Odze R; Chan WW; Ryou M
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2017 Feb; 85(2):419-426. PubMed ID: 27530070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic masses: 22-gauge aspiration versus 25-gauge biopsy needles.
    Yang MJ; Yim H; Hwang JC; Lee D; Kim YB; Lim SG; Kim SS; Kang JK; Yoo BM; Kim JH
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2015 Sep; 15():122. PubMed ID: 26419845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The difference in histological yield between 19G EUS-FNA and EUS-fine-needle biopsy needles.
    Ang TL; Li JW; Kwek ABE; Thurairajah PH; Wang LM
    Endosc Ultrasound; 2019; 8(4):255-260. PubMed ID: 31115385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A multicenter randomized trial comparing a 25-gauge EUS fine-needle aspiration device with a 20-gauge EUS fine-needle biopsy device.
    van Riet PA; Larghi A; Attili F; Rindi G; Nguyen NQ; Ruszkiewicz A; Kitano M; Chikugo T; Aslanian H; Farrell J; Robert M; Adeniran A; Van Der Merwe S; Roskams T; Chang K; Lin F; Lee JG; Arcidiacono PG; Petrone M; Doglioni C; Iglesias-Garcia J; Abdulkader I; Giovannini M; Bories E; Poizat F; Santo E; Scapa E; Marmor S; Bucobo JC; Buscaglia JM; Heimann A; Wu M; Baldaque-Silva F; Moro CF; Erler NS; Biermann K; Poley JW; Cahen DL; Bruno MJ
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2019 Feb; 89(2):329-339. PubMed ID: 30367877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Comparative Study of 22G versus 19G Needles for EUS-Guided Biopsies for Parenchymal Liver Disease: Are Thinner Needles Better?
    Patel HK; Saxena R; Rush N; Patel SK; Dasari CS; Mneimneh W; Quickery A; Rahal MA; Temnykh L; DeWitt J; Al-Haddad M
    Dig Dis Sci; 2021 Jan; 66(1):238-246. PubMed ID: 32128647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impact of EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy sampling with a new core needle on the need for onsite cytopathologic assessment: a preliminary study.
    Rodrigues-Pinto E; Jalaj S; Grimm IS; Baron TH
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2016 Dec; 84(6):1040-1046. PubMed ID: 27345131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of Two Specialized Histology Needles for Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS)-Guided Liver Biopsy: A Pilot Study.
    Hashimoto R; Lee DP; Samarasena JB; Chandan VS; Guo W; Lee JG; Chang KJ
    Dig Dis Sci; 2021 May; 66(5):1700-1706. PubMed ID: 32556821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. EUS-guided fine needle biopsy sampling using a novel fork-tip needle: a case-control study.
    Kandel P; Tranesh G; Nassar A; Bingham R; Raimondo M; Woodward TA; Gomez V; Wallace MB
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2016 Dec; 84(6):1034-1039. PubMed ID: 27018087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Core biopsy needle versus standard aspiration needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic masses: a randomized parallel-group study.
    Lee YN; Moon JH; Kim HK; Choi HJ; Choi MH; Kim DC; Lee TH; Cha SW; Cho YD; Park SH
    Endoscopy; 2014 Dec; 46(12):1056-62. PubMed ID: 25098611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Technical aspects of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided sampling in gastroenterology: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Technical Guideline - March 2017.
    Polkowski M; Jenssen C; Kaye P; Carrara S; Deprez P; Gines A; Fernández-Esparrach G; Eisendrath P; Aithal GP; Arcidiacono P; Barthet M; Bastos P; Fornelli A; Napoleon B; Iglesias-Garcia J; Seicean A; Larghi A; Hassan C; van Hooft JE; Dumonceau JM
    Endoscopy; 2017 Oct; 49(10):989-1006. PubMed ID: 28898917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of 22-gauge standard fine needle versus core biopsy needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of suspected pancreatic cancer: a randomized crossover trial.
    Noh DH; Choi K; Gu S; Cho J; Jang KT; Woo YS; Lee KT; Lee JK; Lee KH
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2018 Jan; 53(1):94-99. PubMed ID: 29065734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Usefulness of endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling using core biopsy needle as a percutaneous biopsy rescue for diagnosis of solid liver mass: Combined histological-cytological analysis.
    Lee YN; Moon JH; Kim HK; Choi HJ; Choi MH; Kim DC; Lee TH; Lee TH; Cha SW; Kim SG; Kim YS
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2015 Jul; 30(7):1161-6. PubMed ID: 25684303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of 19G FNA Versus 22G FNB Needles for Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Sampling of Subepithelial Tumors: Is Bigger Better?
    Li J; Feng J; Gao S; Wang W; Huang L; Yi S; Xu H; Ding XW
    J Ultrasound Med; 2024 Apr; 43(4):761-770. PubMed ID: 38167820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of the diagnostic performance of 2 core biopsy needles for EUS-guided tissue acquisition from solid pancreatic lesions.
    Nayar MK; Paranandi B; Dawwas MF; Leeds JS; Darne A; Haugk B; Majumdar D; Ahmed MM; Oppong KW
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2017 May; 85(5):1017-1024. PubMed ID: 27633157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of 22-gauge aspiration needle with 22-gauge biopsy needle in endoscopic ultrasonography-guided subepithelial tumor sampling.
    Kim GH; Cho YK; Kim EY; Kim HK; Cho JW; Lee TH; Moon JS;
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2014 Mar; 49(3):347-54. PubMed ID: 24325591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparing a 19-gauge fine-needle biopsy needle with a 22-gauge fine-needle biopsy needle for EUS-guided liver biopsy sampling: a prospective randomized study.
    Diehl DL; Sangwan V; Johal AS; Khara HS; Confer B
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2024 Jun; 99(6):931-937. PubMed ID: 38141686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of 22G fine-needle aspiration (FNA) versus fine-needle biopsy (FNB) for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of pancreatic lesions: a prospective comparison study.
    Tian L; Tang AL; Zhang L; Liu XW; Li JB; Wang F; Shen SR; Wang XY
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Aug; 32(8):3533-3539. PubMed ID: 29404729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. 19 G aspiration needle versus 19 G core biopsy needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy: a prospective randomized trial.
    Ching-Companioni RA; Diehl DL; Johal AS; Confer BD; Khara HS
    Endoscopy; 2019 Nov; 51(11):1059-1065. PubMed ID: 31342474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparative accuracy of needle sizes and designs for EUS tissue sampling of solid pancreatic masses: a network meta-analysis.
    Facciorusso A; Wani S; Triantafyllou K; Tziatzios G; Cannizzaro R; Muscatiello N; Singh S
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2019 Dec; 90(6):893-903.e7. PubMed ID: 31310744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. 22-Gauge biopsy needles have a better histological diagnostic yield in the discrimination of specific pancreatic solid neoplasms.
    Jiang H; Guo J; Wang K; Zhu H; Chen J; Xu C; Wang D; Jin Z
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2019 Jan; 54(1):101-107. PubMed ID: 30731044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 31.