BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27530353)

  • 1. Interactions between Bt crops and aquatic ecosystems: A review.
    Venter HJ; Bøhn T
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2016 Dec; 35(12):2891-2902. PubMed ID: 27530353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Risk assessment and ecological effects of transgenic Bacillus thuringiensis crops on non-target organisms.
    Yu HL; Li YH; Wu KM
    J Integr Plant Biol; 2011 Jul; 53(7):520-38. PubMed ID: 21564541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The fate of fusion Cry1Ab/1Ac proteins from Bt-transgenic rice in soil and water.
    Liu Y; Li J; Luo Z; Wang H; Liu F
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2016 Feb; 124():455-459. PubMed ID: 26624932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The impact of secondary pests on Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) crops.
    Catarino R; Ceddia G; Areal FJ; Park J
    Plant Biotechnol J; 2015 Jun; 13(5):601-12. PubMed ID: 25832330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Procedure to select test organisms for environmental risk assessment of genetically modified crops in aquatic systems.
    Hilbeck A; Bundschuh R; Bundschuh M; Hofmann F; Oehen B; Otto M; Schulz R; Trtikova M
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2017 Nov; 13(6):974-979. PubMed ID: 28755496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. No effect of Bt-transgenic rice litter on the meiobenthos community in field ditches.
    Liu Y; Jiang W; Liang Y; Zhao C; Li J
    Pest Manag Sci; 2017 Jun; 73(6):1213-1219. PubMed ID: 27717164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Relevance of Bt toxin interaction studies for environmental risk assessment of genetically modified crops.
    De Schrijver A; De Clercq P; de Maagd RA; van Frankenhuyzen K
    Plant Biotechnol J; 2015 Dec; 13(9):1221-3. PubMed ID: 26032006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Transgenic crops expressing Bacillus thuringiensis toxins and biological control.
    Romeis J; Meissle M; Bigler F
    Nat Biotechnol; 2006 Jan; 24(1):63-71. PubMed ID: 16404399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Safety and advantages of Bacillus thuringiensis-protected plants to control insect pests.
    Betz FS; Hammond BG; Fuchs RL
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2000 Oct; 32(2):156-73. PubMed ID: 11067772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) transgenic crop: an environment friendly insect-pest management strategy.
    Kumar S; Chandra A; Pandey KC
    J Environ Biol; 2008 Sep; 29(5):641-53. PubMed ID: 19295059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The fate and transport of the Cry1Ab protein in an agricultural field and laboratory aquatic microcosms.
    Strain KE; Lydy MJ
    Chemosphere; 2015 Aug; 132():94-100. PubMed ID: 25828252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Daphnia magna negatively affected by chronic exposure to purified Cry-toxins.
    Bøhn T; Rover CM; Semenchuk PR
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2016 May; 91():130-40. PubMed ID: 26993955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Insect resistance management in GM crops: past, present and future.
    Bates SL; Zhao JZ; Roush RT; Shelton AM
    Nat Biotechnol; 2005 Jan; 23(1):57-62. PubMed ID: 15637622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Soil incubation studies with Cry1Ac protein indicate no adverse effect of Bt crops on soil microbial communities.
    Zhaolei L; Naishun B; Xueping C; Jun C; Manqiu X; Zhiping S; Ming N; Changming F
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2018 May; 152():33-41. PubMed ID: 29407780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Risk assessment of Bt crops on the non-target plant-associated insects and soil organisms.
    Yaqoob A; Shahid AA; Samiullah TR; Rao AQ; Khan MA; Tahir S; Mirza SA; Husnain T
    J Sci Food Agric; 2016 Jun; 96(8):2613-9. PubMed ID: 26857894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Impact of genetically modified organisms on aquatic environments: Review of available data for the risk assessment.
    Pott A; Otto M; Schulz R
    Sci Total Environ; 2018 Sep; 635():687-698. PubMed ID: 29680759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Performance and cross-crop resistance of Cry1F-maize selected Spodoptera frugiperda on transgenic Bt cotton: implications for resistance management.
    Yang F; Kerns DL; Brown S; Kurtz R; Dennehy T; Braxton B; Head G; Huang F
    Sci Rep; 2016 Jun; 6():28059. PubMed ID: 27301612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Plant fitness assessment for wild relatives of insect resistant crops.
    Letourneau DK; Hagen JA
    Environ Biosafety Res; 2009; 8(1):45-55. PubMed ID: 19419653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Current trends in Bt crops and their fate on associated microbial community dynamics: a review.
    Singh AK; Dubey SK
    Protoplasma; 2016 May; 253(3):663-681. PubMed ID: 26560114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Insect resistance to transgenic Bt crops: lessons from the laboratory and field.
    Tabashnik BE; Carrière Y; Dennehy TJ; Morin S; Sisterson MS; Roush RT; Shelton AM; Zhao JZ
    J Econ Entomol; 2003 Aug; 96(4):1031-8. PubMed ID: 14503572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.