These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27531017)

  • 1. Peripheral stimuli generate different forms of inhibition of return when participants make prosaccades versus antisaccades to them.
    Redden RS; Hilchey MD; Klein RM
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Nov; 78(8):2283-2291. PubMed ID: 27531017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Using Speed and Accuracy and the Simon Effect to Explore the Output Form of Inhibition of Return.
    Redden RS; Hilchey MD; Aslam S; Ivanoff J; Klein RM
    Vision (Basel); 2023 Mar; 7(1):. PubMed ID: 36977305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Returning to "inhibition of return" by dissociating long-term oculomotor IOR from short-term sensory adaptation and other nonoculomotor "inhibitory" cueing effects.
    Hilchey MD; Klein RM; Satel J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Aug; 40(4):1603-16. PubMed ID: 24820438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Using the locus-of-slack logic to determine whether inhibition of return in a cue-target paradigm is delaying early or late stages of processing.
    Kavyani M; Farsi A; Abdoli B; Klein RM
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2017 Mar; 71(1):63-70. PubMed ID: 27936837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Attention allocation before antisaccades.
    Klapetek A; Jonikaitis D; Deubel H
    J Vis; 2016; 16(1):11. PubMed ID: 26790843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effects of ignored versus foveated cues upon inhibition of return: an event-related potential study.
    Satel J; Hilchey MD; Wang Z; Story R; Klein RM
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Jan; 75(1):29-40. PubMed ID: 23077028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Stimulus-response incompatibility eliminates inhibitory cueing effects with saccadic but not manual responses.
    Eng V; Lim A; Kwon S; Gan SR; Jamaluddin SA; Janssen SMJ; Satel J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 May; 79(4):1097-1106. PubMed ID: 28229429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Placeholders dissociate two forms of inhibition of return.
    Hilchey MD; Pratt J; Christie J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Feb; 71(2):360-371. PubMed ID: 27737621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Perceptual and motor inhibition of return: components or flavors?
    Hilchey MD; Klein RM; Ivanoff J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Oct; 74(7):1416-29. PubMed ID: 22714957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dissociable spatial and temporal effects of inhibition of return.
    Wang Z; Theeuwes J
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(8):e44290. PubMed ID: 22952949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Inhibition of return: a "depth-blind" mechanism?
    Casagrande M; Barbato M; Mereu S; Martella D; Marotta A; Theeuwes J; Collinson SL
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2012 May; 140(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 22465912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. On the uniqueness of attentional capture by uninformative gaze cues: facilitation interacts with the Simon effect and is rarely followed by IOR.
    McKee D; Christie J; Klein R
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2007 Dec; 61(4):293-303. PubMed ID: 18266505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. On the role of eye movement monitoring and discouragement on inhibition of return in a go/no-go task.
    Hilchey MD; Hashish M; MacLean GH; Satel J; Ivanoff J; Klein RM
    Vision Res; 2014 Mar; 96():133-9. PubMed ID: 24333328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A short-lived face alert during inhibition of return.
    Weaver MD; Aronsen D; Lauwereyns J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Apr; 74(3):510-20. PubMed ID: 22205613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prosaccades and antisaccades to onsets and color singletons: evidence that erroneous prosaccades are not reflexive.
    Godijn R; Kramer AF
    Exp Brain Res; 2006 Jul; 172(4):439-48. PubMed ID: 16482469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Switching, plasticity, and prediction in a saccadic task-switch paradigm.
    Barton JJ; Greenzang C; Hefter R; Edelman J; Manoach DS
    Exp Brain Res; 2006 Jan; 168(1-2):76-87. PubMed ID: 16096781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Inhibitory cueing effects following manual and saccadic responses to arrow cues.
    Ding Y; He T; Satel J; Wang Z
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 May; 78(4):1020-9. PubMed ID: 26956560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The unidirectional prosaccade switch-cost: correct and error antisaccades differentially influence the planning times for subsequent prosaccades.
    DeSimone JC; Weiler J; Aber GS; Heath M
    Vision Res; 2014 Mar; 96():17-24. PubMed ID: 24412739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Task-switching effects for visual and auditory pro- and antisaccades: evidence for a task-set inertia.
    Heath M; Starrs F; Macpherson E; Weiler J
    J Mot Behav; 2015; 47(4):319-27. PubMed ID: 25584657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of scene removal on inhibition of return in a cue-target task.
    Redden RS; Klages J; Klein RM
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Jan; 79(1):78-84. PubMed ID: 27804031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.