These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27531124)

  • 1. Chemically modified titanium-zirconium implants in comparison with commercially pure titanium controls stimulate the early molecular pathways of bone healing.
    Galli S; Jimbo R; Naito Y; Berner S; Dard M; Wennerberg A
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2017 Oct; 28(10):1234-1240. PubMed ID: 27531124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The osseointegration behavior of titanium-zirconium implants in ovariectomized rabbits.
    Wen B; Zhu F; Li Z; Zhang P; Lin X; Dard M
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Jul; 25(7):819-25. PubMed ID: 23432001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Tissue integration of a new titanium-zirconium dental implant: a comparative histologic and radiographic study in the canine.
    Thoma DS; Jones AA; Dard M; Grize L; Obrecht M; Cochran DL
    J Periodontol; 2011 Oct; 82(10):1453-61. PubMed ID: 21961454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Osseointegration of zirconia implants with different surface characteristics: an evaluation in rabbits.
    Hoffmann O; Angelov N; Zafiropoulos GG; Andreana S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(2):352-8. PubMed ID: 22442775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of the Use of Titanium-Zirconium Alloy and Titanium Alloy in Dental Implants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Cruz RS; Lemos CAA; Oliveira HFF; de Souza Batista VE; Pellizzer EP; Verri FR
    J Oral Implantol; 2018 Aug; 44(4):305-312. PubMed ID: 29457740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Which surface properties enhance bone response to implants? Comparison of oxidized magnesium, TiUnite, and Osseotite implant surfaces.
    Sul YT; Johansson C; Albrektsson T
    Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(4):319-28. PubMed ID: 16900812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Biomechanical and histomorphometric evaluation of osseointegration of fusion-sputtered zirconia implants.
    Salem NA; Abo Taleb AL; Aboushelib MN
    J Prosthodont; 2013 Jun; 22(4):261-7. PubMed ID: 23107438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of a new titanium-zirconium dental implant: a biomechanical and histological comparative study in the mini pig.
    Gottlow J; Dard M; Kjellson F; Obrecht M; Sennerby L
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Aug; 14(4):538-45. PubMed ID: 20586785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Vertical osteoconductivity and early bone formation of titanium-zirconium and titanium implants in a subperiosteal rabbit animal model.
    Kämmerer PW; Palarie V; Schiegnitz E; Hagmann S; Alshihri A; Al-Nawas B
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Jul; 25(7):774-80. PubMed ID: 23590559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Osseointegration behavior of novel Ti-Nb-Zr-Ta-Si alloy for dental implants: an in vivo study.
    Wang X; Meng X; Chu S; Xiang X; Liu Z; Zhao J; Zhou Y
    J Mater Sci Mater Med; 2016 Sep; 27(9):139. PubMed ID: 27534399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bone apposition to a titanium-zirconium alloy implant, as compared to two other titanium-containing implants.
    Saulacic N; Bosshardt DD; Bornstein MM; Berner S; Buser D
    Eur Cell Mater; 2012 Apr; 23():273-86; discussion 286-8. PubMed ID: 22492019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Biomechanical and Histomorphometrical Evaluation of TiZr Alloy Implants: An in vivo Study in the Rabbit.
    Jimbo R; Naito Y; Galli S; Berner S; Dard M; Wennerberg A
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Oct; 17 Suppl 2():e670-8. PubMed ID: 25879834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. One-year follow-up of titanium/zirconium alloy X commercially pure titanium narrow-diameter implants placed in the molar region of the mandible: a randomized controlled trial.
    Tolentino L; Sukekava F; Garcez-Filho J; Tormena M; Lima LA; Araújo MG
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2016 Apr; 27(4):393-8. PubMed ID: 25692479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ex vivo and in vivo biomechanical test of implant attachment to various materials: introduction of a new user-friendly removal torque equipment.
    Johansson CB; Jimbo R; Stefenson P
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Aug; 14(4):603-11. PubMed ID: 20662862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Biomechanical and histomorphometric comparison between zirconia implants with varying surface textures and a titanium implant in the maxilla of miniature pigs.
    Gahlert M; Gudehus T; Eichhorn S; Steinhauser E; Kniha H; Erhardt W
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Oct; 18(5):662-8. PubMed ID: 17608736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Osseointegration of zirconia and titanium implants in a rabbit tibiae model evaluated by microtomography, histomorphometry and fluorochrome labeling analyses.
    Martins R; Cestari TM; Arantes RVN; Santos PS; Taga R; Carbonari MJ; Oliveira RC
    J Periodontal Res; 2018 Apr; 53(2):210-221. PubMed ID: 29044523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mechanical property assessment of bone healing around a titanium-zirconium alloy dental implant.
    Anchieta RB; Baldassarri M; Guastaldi F; Tovar N; Janal MN; Gottlow J; Dard M; Jimbo R; Coelho PG
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2014 Dec; 16(6):913-9. PubMed ID: 23527994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparable responses of osteoblast lineage cells to microstructured hydrophilic titanium-zirconium and microstructured hydrophilic titanium.
    Lotz EM; Olivares-Navarrete R; Hyzy SL; Berner S; Schwartz Z; Boyan BD
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2017 Jul; 28(7):e51-e59. PubMed ID: 27273082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Survival rate of titanium-zirconium narrow diameter dental implants versus commercially pure titanium narrow diameter dental implants: A systematic review.
    Iegami CM; Uehara PN; Sesma N; Pannuti CM; Tortamano Neto P; Mukai MK
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2017 Dec; 19(6):1015-1022. PubMed ID: 28853215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Titanium-zirconium narrow-diameter versus titanium regular-diameter implants for anterior and premolar single crowns: 1-year results of a randomized controlled clinical study.
    Benic GI; Gallucci GO; Mokti M; Hämmerle CH; Weber HP; Jung RE
    J Clin Periodontol; 2013 Nov; 40(11):1052-61. PubMed ID: 24015975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.