These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27532427)

  • 1. Plant Disease Severity Assessment-How Rater Bias, Assessment Method, and Experimental Design Affect Hypothesis Testing and Resource Use Efficiency.
    Chiang KS; Bock CH; Lee IH; El Jarroudi M; Delfosse P
    Phytopathology; 2016 Dec; 106(12):1451-1464. PubMed ID: 27532427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Some consequences of using the Horsfall-Barratt scale for hypothesis testing.
    Bock CH; Gottwald TR; Parker PE; Ferrandino F; Welham S; van den Bosch F; Parnell S
    Phytopathology; 2010 Oct; 100(10):1030-41. PubMed ID: 20839938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Disease Severity Estimates-Effects of Rater Accuracy and Assessment Methods for Comparing Treatments.
    Bock CH; El Jarroudi M; Kouadio LA; Mackels C; Chiang KS; Delfosse P
    Plant Dis; 2015 Aug; 99(8):1104-1112. PubMed ID: 30695946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. What interval characteristics make a good categorical disease assessment scale?
    Chiang KS; Liu SC; Bock CH; Gottwald TR
    Phytopathology; 2014 Jun; 104(6):575-85. PubMed ID: 24450461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Effect of Horsfall-Barratt Category Size on the Accuracy and Reliability of Estimates of Pecan Scab Severity.
    Bock CH; Wood BW; van den Bosch F; Parnell S; Gottwald TR
    Plant Dis; 2013 Jun; 97(6):797-806. PubMed ID: 30722594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quantitative Ordinal Scale Estimates of Plant Disease Severity: Comparing Treatments Using a Proportional Odds Model.
    Chiang KS; Liu HI; Chen YL; El Jarroudi M; Bock CH
    Phytopathology; 2020 Apr; 110(4):734-743. PubMed ID: 31859585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sample size calculations for population pharmacodynamic experiments involving repeated dichotomous observations.
    Ogungbenro K; Aarons L
    J Biopharm Stat; 2008; 18(6):1212-27. PubMed ID: 18991118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of sample size and bias on the reliability of estimates of error: a comparative study of Dahlberg's formula.
    Springate SD
    Eur J Orthod; 2012 Apr; 34(2):158-63. PubMed ID: 21447784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An evaluation of inferential procedures for adaptive clinical trial designs with pre-specified rules for modifying the sample size.
    Levin GP; Emerson SC; Emerson SS
    Biometrics; 2014 Sep; 70(3):556-67. PubMed ID: 24766094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Optimized multi-stage designs controlling the false discovery or the family-wise error rate.
    Zehetmayer S; Bauer P; Posch M
    Stat Med; 2008 Sep; 27(21):4145-60. PubMed ID: 18444249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Optimal designs for estimating and testing interaction among multiple loci in complex traits by a Gibbs sampler.
    Lee C; Kim Y
    Genomics; 2008 Dec; 92(6):446-51. PubMed ID: 18786631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sample size re-estimation in group-sequential response-adaptive clinical trials.
    Morgan CC
    Stat Med; 2003 Dec; 22(24):3843-57. PubMed ID: 14673942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Balanced two-stage designs for phase II clinical trials.
    Ye F; Shyr Y
    Clin Trials; 2007; 4(5):514-24. PubMed ID: 17942467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Generalized sample size determination formulas for experimental research with hierarchical data.
    Usami S
    Behav Res Methods; 2014 Jun; 46(2):346-56. PubMed ID: 24197710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Pecan Scab Severity-Effects of Assessment Methods.
    Bock CH; Wood BW; Gottwald TR
    Plant Dis; 2013 May; 97(5):675-684. PubMed ID: 30722189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Statistical Power in Plant Pathology Research.
    Gent DH; Esker PD; Kriss AB
    Phytopathology; 2018 Jan; 108(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 28876210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Making reliable decisions in the study of wildlife diseases: using hypothesis tests, statistical power, and observed effects.
    O'Brien C; van Riper C; Myers DE
    J Wildl Dis; 2009 Jul; 45(3):700-12. PubMed ID: 19617480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Balanced designs in longitudinal population pharmacokinetic studies.
    Ette EI; Sun H; Ludden TM
    J Clin Pharmacol; 1998 May; 38(5):417-23. PubMed ID: 9602953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Exact test size and power of a Gaussian error linear model for an internal pilot study.
    Coffey CS; Muller KE
    Stat Med; 1999 May; 18(10):1199-214. PubMed ID: 10363340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Optimal response-adaptive randomized designs for multi-armed survival trials.
    Sverdlov O; Tymofyeyev Y; Wong WK
    Stat Med; 2011 Oct; 30(24):2890-910. PubMed ID: 21823146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.