These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27532869)

  • 21. Geographic Information System mapping as a tool to assess nonresponse bias in survey research.
    Hansen RA; Henley AC; Brouwer ES; Oraefo AN; Roth MT
    Res Social Adm Pharm; 2007 Sep; 3(3):249-64. PubMed ID: 17945157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The impact of nonresponse in different survey stages on the precision of prevalence estimates for multi-stage survey studies.
    Ma M; Rosenberg S; Kaizer AM
    BMC Res Notes; 2021 Nov; 14(1):423. PubMed ID: 34819165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Response trends and nonresponse bias in a mail survey of oral and facial pain.
    Locker D; Grushka M
    J Public Health Dent; 1988; 48(1):20-5. PubMed ID: 3422313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Initial nonresponse and survey response mode biases in survey research.
    Chi DL; Chen CY
    J Public Health Dent; 2015; 75(3):169-74. PubMed ID: 25706185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Do canadian researchers and the lay public prioritize biomedical research outcomes equally? A choice experiment.
    Miller FA; Mentzakis E; Axler R; Lehoux P; French M; Tarride JE; Wodchis WP; Wilson BJ; Longo C; Bytautas JP; Slater B
    Acad Med; 2013 Apr; 88(4):519-26. PubMed ID: 23425982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Factors influencing the effectiveness of mailed health surveys.
    Gilbert GH; Longmate J; Branch LG
    Public Health Rep; 1992; 107(5):576-84. PubMed ID: 1410240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Nonresponse analysis and adjustment in a mail survey on car accidents.
    Tivesten E; Jonsson S; Jakobsson L; Norin H
    Accid Anal Prev; 2012 Sep; 48():401-15. PubMed ID: 22664706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effect of respondent code location on survey response rate.
    King KA; Vidourek RA
    Psychol Rep; 2011 Dec; 109(3):718-22. PubMed ID: 22420106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Nonresponse in the National Survey of Children's Health, 2007.
    Skalland BJ; Blumberg SJ
    Vital Health Stat 2; 2012 Jun; (156):1-22. PubMed ID: 23088067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Survey nonresponse among ethnic minorities in a national health survey--a mixed-method study of participation, barriers, and potentials.
    Ahlmark N; Algren MH; Holmberg T; Norredam ML; Nielsen SS; Blom AB; Bo A; Juel K
    Ethn Health; 2015; 20(6):611-32. PubMed ID: 25411892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Response rates for surveys of chiropractors.
    Russell ML; Verhoef MJ; Injeyan HS; McMorland DG
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2004 Jan; 27(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 14739873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Estimating the effect of nonresponse bias in a survey of hospital organizations.
    Lewis EF; Hardy M; Snaith B
    Eval Health Prof; 2013 Sep; 36(3):330-51. PubMed ID: 23908382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. How to obtain excellent response rates when surveying physicians.
    Thorpe C; Ryan B; McLean SL; Burt A; Stewart M; Brown JB; Reid GJ; Harris S
    Fam Pract; 2009 Feb; 26(1):65-8. PubMed ID: 19074758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effects of various methodologic strategies: survey response rates among Canadian physicians and physicians-in-training.
    Grava-Gubins I; Scott S
    Can Fam Physician; 2008 Oct; 54(10):1424-30. PubMed ID: 18854472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effects of repeated callbacks on response rate and nonresponse bias: results from a 17-state pharmacy survey.
    Westrick SC; Mount JK
    Res Social Adm Pharm; 2008 Mar; 4(1):46-58. PubMed ID: 18342822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Nonresponse bias in randomized controlled experiments in criminology: Putting the Queensland Community Engagement Trial (QCET) under a microscope.
    Antrobus E; Elffers H; White G; Mazerolle L
    Eval Rev; 2013; 37(3-4):197-212. PubMed ID: 24535844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Meta-analysis: Problems with Russian Publications.
    Verbitskaya EV
    Int J Risk Saf Med; 2015; 27 Suppl 1():S89-90. PubMed ID: 26639728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Reported response rates to mailed physician questionnaires.
    Cummings SM; Savitz LA; Konrad TR
    Health Serv Res; 2001 Feb; 35(6):1347-55. PubMed ID: 11221823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Assessing the Quality of Published Surveys in Ophthalmology.
    Tran EM; Tran MM; Clark MA; Scott IU; Margo CE; Cosenza C; Johnson TP; Greenberg PB
    Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 2020 Oct; 27(5):339-343. PubMed ID: 32248737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Critical assessment of progress of medical sciences in Iran and Turkey: the way developing countries with limited resources should make effective contributions to the production of science.
    Massarrat S; Kolahdoozan S
    Arch Iran Med; 2011 Nov; 14(6):370-7. PubMed ID: 22039839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.