These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

378 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27533063)

  • 1. Multi-Day Recordings of Wearable Sensors Are Valid and Sensitive Measures of Function and Independence in Human Spinal Cord Injury.
    Brogioli M; Popp WL; Schneider S; Albisser U; Brust AK; Frotzler A; Gassert R; Curt A; Starkey ML
    J Neurotrauma; 2017 Mar; 34(6):1141-1148. PubMed ID: 27533063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Predictive Value of Upper Limb Muscles and Grasp Patterns on Functional Outcome in Cervical Spinal Cord Injury.
    Velstra IM; Bolliger M; Krebs J; Rietman JS; Curt A
    Neurorehabil Neural Repair; 2016 May; 30(4):295-306. PubMed ID: 26156192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Novel Sensor Technology To Assess Independence and Limb-Use Laterality in Cervical Spinal Cord Injury.
    Brogioli M; Popp WL; Albisser U; Brust AK; Frotzler A; Gassert R; Curt A; Starkey ML
    J Neurotrauma; 2016 Nov; 33(21):1950-1957. PubMed ID: 27025797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Changes in Strength, Sensation, and Prehension in Acute Cervical Spinal Cord Injury: European Multicenter Responsiveness Study of the GRASSP.
    Velstra IM; Curt A; Frotzler A; Abel R; Kalsi-Ryan S; Rietman JS; Bolliger M
    Neurorehabil Neural Repair; 2015 Sep; 29(8):755-66. PubMed ID: 25567122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Development of the Graded Redefined Assessment of Strength, Sensibility and Prehension (GRASSP): reviewing measurement specific to the upper limb in tetraplegia.
    Kalsi-Ryan S; Curt A; Verrier MC; Fehlings MG
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Sep; 17(1 Suppl):65-76. PubMed ID: 22985372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Graded Redefined Assessment of Strength Sensibility and Prehension: reliability and validity.
    Kalsi-Ryan S; Beaton D; Curt A; Duff S; Popovic MR; Rudhe C; Fehlings MG; Verrier MC
    J Neurotrauma; 2012 Mar; 29(5):905-14. PubMed ID: 21568688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Defining the role of sensation, strength, and prehension for upper limb function in cervical spinal cord injury.
    Kalsi-Ryan S; Beaton D; Curt A; Duff S; Jiang D; Popovic MR; Rudhe C; Fehlings MG; Verrier MC
    Neurorehabil Neural Repair; 2014 Jan; 28(1):66-74. PubMed ID: 23778700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prediction and stratification of upper limb function and self-care in acute cervical spinal cord injury with the graded redefined assessment of strength, sensibility, and prehension (GRASSP).
    Velstra IM; Bolliger M; Tanadini LG; Baumberger M; Abel R; Rietman JS; Curt A
    Neurorehabil Neural Repair; 2014 Sep; 28(7):632-42. PubMed ID: 24566986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impact of Upper Limb Motor Recovery on Functional Independence After Traumatic Low Cervical Spinal Cord Injury.
    Javeed S; Zhang JK; Greenberg JK; Botterbush K; Benedict B; Plog B; Gupta VP; Dibble CF; Khalifeh JM; Wen H; Chen Y; Park Y; Belzberg A; Tuffaha S; Burks SS; Levi AD; Zager EL; Faraji AH; Mahan MA; Midha R; Wilson TJ; Juknis N; Ray WZ
    J Neurotrauma; 2024 May; 41(9-10):1211-1222. PubMed ID: 38062795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of lower extremity motor score parameters for patients with motor incomplete spinal cord injury using gait parameters.
    Shin JC; Yoo JH; Jung TH; Goo HR
    Spinal Cord; 2011 Apr; 49(4):529-33. PubMed ID: 21102574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Predicting task performance from upper extremity impairment measures after cervical spinal cord injury.
    Zariffa J; Curt A; Verrier MC; Fehlings MG; Kalsi-Ryan S;
    Spinal Cord; 2016 Dec; 54(12):1145-1151. PubMed ID: 27241449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Outcome of the upper limb in cervical spinal cord injury: Profiles of recovery and insights for clinical studies.
    Kalsi-Ryan S; Beaton D; Curt A; Popovic MR; Verrier MC; Fehlings MG
    J Spinal Cord Med; 2014 Sep; 37(5):503-10. PubMed ID: 25229734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Predictive Value of Midsagittal Tissue Bridges on Functional Recovery After Spinal Cord Injury.
    Pfyffer D; Vallotton K; Curt A; Freund P
    Neurorehabil Neural Repair; 2021 Jan; 35(1):33-43. PubMed ID: 33190619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Robot-assisted Therapy for the Upper Limb after Cervical Spinal Cord Injury.
    Yozbatiran N; Francisco GE
    Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am; 2019 May; 30(2):367-384. PubMed ID: 30954153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. New Insights from Clinical Assessment of Upper Extremities in Cervical Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury.
    Carrasco-López C; Jimenez S; Mosqueda-Pozon MC; Pérez-Borrego YA; Alcobendas-Maestro M; Gallego-Izquierdo T; Esclarin-Ruz A; Oliviero A
    J Neurotrauma; 2016 Sep; 33(18):1724-7. PubMed ID: 26936413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Upper limb muscle activation during sports video gaming of persons with spinal cord injury.
    Jaramillo JP; Johanson ME; Kiratli BJ
    J Spinal Cord Med; 2019 Jan; 42(1):77-85. PubMed ID: 29616887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Muscle force and gait performance: relationships after spinal cord injury.
    Wirz M; van Hedel HJ; Rupp R; Curt A; Dietz V
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2006 Sep; 87(9):1218-22. PubMed ID: 16935058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of the Capabilities of Upper Extremity Test (CUE-T) in Children With Tetraplegia.
    Dent K; Grampurohit N; Thielen CC; Sadowsky C; Davidson L; Taylor HB; Bultman J; Gaughan J; Marino RJ; Mulcahey MJ
    Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil; 2018; 24(3):239-251. PubMed ID: 29997427
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Graded and Redefined Assessment of Strength, Sensibility, and Prehension Version 2 Provides Interval Measure Properties.
    Velstra IM; Fellinghauer C; Abel R; Kalsi-Ryan S; Rupp R; Curt A
    J Neurotrauma; 2018 Mar; 35(6):854-863. PubMed ID: 29160145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of Responsiveness and Minimal Clinically Important Difference of the Capabilities of Upper Extremity Test (CUE-T) and the Graded Redefined Assessment of Strength, Sensibility and Prehension (GRASSP).
    Marino RJ; Sinko R; Bryden A; Backus D; Chen D; Nemunaitis GA; Leiby BE
    Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil; 2018; 24(3):227-238. PubMed ID: 29997426
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.