BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27533110)

  • 1. Sarcoplasmic Protein Profile from Drip Loss in Relation to Pork Quality.
    Przybylski W; Kaczor D; Żelechowska E; Jaworska D; Kajak-Siemaszko K; Boruszewska K; Jankiewicz U
    J Food Sci; 2016 Oct; 81(10):C2320-C2326. PubMed ID: 27533110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The application of biosensors for drip loss analysis and glycolytic potential evaluation.
    Przybylski W; Sionek B; Jaworska D; Santé-Lhoutellier V
    Meat Sci; 2016 Jul; 117():7-11. PubMed ID: 26930360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Physicochemical characteristics and sensory attributes of meat from heavy-weight Iberian and F1 Large White × Landrace pigs finished intensively or in free-range conditions.
    Almeida J; Bressan MC; Santos-Silva J; Moreira O; Bettencourt C; Gama LT
    J Anim Sci; 2018 Jun; 96(7):2734-2746. PubMed ID: 29767730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Relationships between longissimus glycolytic potential and swine growth performance, carcass traits, and pork quality.
    Hamilton DN; Miller KD; Ellis M; McKeith FK; Wilson ER
    J Anim Sci; 2003 Sep; 81(9):2206-12. PubMed ID: 12968695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Postmortem protein degradation is a key contributor to fresh pork loin tenderness.
    Carlson KB; Prusa KJ; Fedler CA; Steadham EM; Outhouse AC; King DA; Huff-Lonergan E; Lonergan SM
    J Anim Sci; 2017 Apr; 95(4):1574-1586. PubMed ID: 28464104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Higher drip loss is associated with protein oxidation.
    Traore S; Aubry L; Gatellier P; Przybylski W; Jaworska D; Kajak-Siemaszko K; Santé-Lhoutellier V
    Meat Sci; 2012 Apr; 90(4):917-24. PubMed ID: 22193037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effects of instrumental color and extractable lipid content on sensory characteristics of pork loin chops cooked to a medium-rare degree of doneness.
    Wilson KB; Overholt MF; Shull CM; Schwab C; Dilger AC; Boler DD
    J Anim Sci; 2017 May; 95(5):2052-2060. PubMed ID: 28726999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Different Statistical Approaches to Investigate Porcine Muscle Metabolome Profiles to Highlight New Biomarkers for Pork Quality Assessment.
    Welzenbach J; Neuhoff C; Looft C; Schellander K; Tholen E; Große-Brinkhaus C
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0149758. PubMed ID: 26919205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Low temperature cooking of pork meat - Physicochemical and sensory aspects.
    Becker A; Boulaaba A; Pingen S; Krischek C; Klein G
    Meat Sci; 2016 Aug; 118():82-8. PubMed ID: 27060409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Identification of single nucleotide polymorphisms in carnosine-related genes and effects of genotypes on pork meat quality attributes.
    D'Astous-Pagé J; Gariépy C; Blouin R; Cliche S; Méthot S; Sullivan B; Fortin F; Palin MF
    Meat Sci; 2017 Dec; 134():54-60. PubMed ID: 28759885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Formation of heterocyclic aromatic amines in relation to pork quality and heat treatment parameters.
    Buła M; Przybylski W; Jaworska D; Kajak-Siemaszko K
    Food Chem; 2019 Mar; 276():511-519. PubMed ID: 30409627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Intramuscular variations of proteome and muscle fiber type distribution in semimembranosus and semitendinosus muscles associated with pork quality.
    Kim GD; Yang HS; Jeong JY
    Food Chem; 2018 Apr; 244():143-152. PubMed ID: 29120762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of myosin heavy chain isoforms on meat quality, fatty acid composition, and sensory evaluation in Berkshire pigs.
    Kang YK; Choi YM; Lee SH; Choe JH; Hong KC; Kim BC
    Meat Sci; 2011 Dec; 89(4):384-9. PubMed ID: 21636221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of inulin supply to high-fat diet rich in saturated fatty acids on pork quality and profile of sarcoplasmic protein in meat exudate.
    Przybylski W; Jaworska D; Sałek P; Sobol M; Branicki M; Skiba G; Raj S; Jankiewicz U
    J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl); 2019 Mar; 103(2):593-602. PubMed ID: 30552727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The inclusion of Duroc breed in maternal line affects pork quality and fatty acid profile.
    Alonso V; Muela E; Gutiérrez B; Calanche JB; Roncalés P; Beltrán JA
    Meat Sci; 2015 Sep; 107():49-56. PubMed ID: 25938812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Applications of Biosensors for Meat Quality Evaluations.
    Sionek B; Przybylski W; Bańska A; Florowski T
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 Nov; 21(22):. PubMed ID: 34833506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Preslaughter stress and muscle energy largely determine pork quality at two commercial processing plants.
    Hambrecht E; Eissen JJ; Nooijent RI; Ducro BJ; Smits CH; den Hartog LA; Verstegen MW
    J Anim Sci; 2004 May; 82(5):1401-9. PubMed ID: 15144080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sensory perception of meat from entire male pigs processed by different heating methods.
    Peñaranda I; Garrido MD; Egea M; Díaz P; Álvarez D; Oliver MA; Linares MB
    Meat Sci; 2017 Dec; 134():98-102. PubMed ID: 28779718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of activity, expression and S-nitrosylation of glycolytic enzymes between pale, soft and exudative and red, firm and non-exudative pork during post-mortem aging.
    Wang Y; Liu R; Hou Q; Tian X; Fan X; Zhang W; Zhou G
    Food Chem; 2020 Jun; 314():126203. PubMed ID: 31978718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of production system in local and conventional pig breeds on stress indicators at slaughter, muscle and meat traits and pork eating quality.
    Lebret B; Ecolan P; Bonhomme N; Méteau K; Prunier A
    Animal; 2015 Aug; 9(8):1404-13. PubMed ID: 25908582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.