These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

243 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27534589)

  • 1. Description and Evaluation of the Research Ethics Review Process in Japan: Proposed Measures for Improvement.
    Suzuki M; Sato K
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2016 Jul; 11(3):256-66. PubMed ID: 27534589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Biomedical Research Ethics Committees in sub-Saharan Africa: a collective review of their structure, functioning, and outcomes.
    Silaigwana B; Wassenaar D
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2015 Apr; 10(2):169-84. PubMed ID: 25819759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Research Ethics Committees' Oversight of Biomedical Research in South Africa: A Thematic Analysis of Ethical Issues Raised During Ethics Review of Non-Expedited Protocols.
    Silaigwana B; Wassenaar D
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2019 Apr; 14(2):107-116. PubMed ID: 30678521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ethical regulation of biomedical research in Brazil: a quality improvement initiative.
    de Castro DRP; Castillo CHM; Ferreira JPD; Oliveira JPA; Kirsten TF; de França PHC; Zavalhia LS; Notti RK; Kochhann R; Amantéa SL
    BMC Med Ethics; 2024 Jun; 25(1):68. PubMed ID: 38858731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Do research ethics committees identify process errors in applications for ethical approval?
    Angell E; Dixon-Woods M
    J Med Ethics; 2009 Feb; 35(2):130-2. PubMed ID: 19181888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. South African Research Ethics Committee Review of Standards of Prevention in HIV Vaccine Trial Protocols.
    Essack Z; Wassenaar DR
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2018 Jul; 13(3):239-246. PubMed ID: 29631486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Decisions by Finnish Medical Research Ethics Committees: A Nationwide Study of Process and Outcomes.
    Hemminki E; Virtanen JI; Regushevskaya E
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2015 Oct; 10(4):404-13. PubMed ID: 26333684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Using the Emanuel et al. framework to assess ethical issues raised by a biomedical research ethics committee in South Africa.
    Tsoka-Gwegweni JM; Wassenaar DR
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2014 Dec; 9(5):36-45. PubMed ID: 25747689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Research ethics committees in Japan: A perspective from thirty years of experience at Tokushima University.
    Yanagawa H; Katashima R; Takeda N
    J Med Invest; 2015; 62(3-4):114-8. PubMed ID: 26399332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Measuring inconsistency in research ethics committee review.
    Trace S; Kolstoe SE
    BMC Med Ethics; 2017 Nov; 18(1):65. PubMed ID: 29179709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Confidence of IRB/REC Members in Their Assessments of Human Research Risk: A Study of IRB/REC Decision Making in Action.
    Grinnell F; Sadler JZ; McNamara V; Senetar K; Reisch J
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2017 Jul; 12(3):140-149. PubMed ID: 28558484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Small is beautiful: demystifying and simplifying standard operating procedures: a model from the ethics review and consultancy committee of the Cameroon Bioethics Initiative.
    Ouwe Missi Oukem-Boyer O; Munung NS; Tangwa GB
    BMC Med Ethics; 2016 May; 17(1):27. PubMed ID: 27178053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ethical considerations in malaria research proposal review: empirical evidence from 114 proposals submitted to an Ethics Committee in Thailand.
    Adams P; Prakobtham S; Limphattharacharoen C; Vutikes P; Khusmith S; Pengsaa K; Wilairatana P; Kaewkungwal J
    Malar J; 2015 Sep; 14():342. PubMed ID: 26370243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Challenge of Timely, Responsive and Rigorous Ethics Review of Disaster Research: Views of Research Ethics Committee Members.
    Hunt M; Tansey CM; Anderson J; Boulanger RF; Eckenwiler L; Pringle J; Schwartz L
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(6):e0157142. PubMed ID: 27327165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An overview of ethical review committees in Japan: examining the certification applications of ethical review committees.
    Iijima Y; Ogasawara K; Toda S; Takano T
    Nagoya J Med Sci; 2019 Aug; 81(3):501-509. PubMed ID: 31579340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Professional and academic profile of the Brazilian research ethics committees.
    de Veras Santos EP; Guerriero ICZ
    BMC Med Ethics; 2022 Nov; 23(1):109. PubMed ID: 36368994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Current status of the research ethics committees in Thailand.
    Panichkul S; Mahaisavariya P; Morakote N; Condo S; Caengow S; Ketunpanya A
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2011 Aug; 94(8):1013-8. PubMed ID: 21863687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A Call for Better, Not Faster, Research Ethics Committee Reviews in the Covid-19 Era.
    Tamariz L; Hendler FJ; Wells JM; Anderson A; Bartlett S
    Ethics Hum Res; 2021 Sep; 43(5):42-44. PubMed ID: 34496160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A Scoping Study on the Ethics of Health Systems Research.
    Bachani AM; Rattani A; Hyder AA
    Dev World Bioeth; 2016 Dec; 16(3):124-132. PubMed ID: 27038160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A Case-Study of the Resources and Functioning of Two Research Ethics Committees in Western India.
    Chenneville T; Menezes L; Kosambiya J; Baxi R
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2016 Dec; 11(5):387-396. PubMed ID: 26994735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.