BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

3216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27535233)

  • 1. Elective cesarean section or not? Maternal age and risk of adverse outcomes at term: a population-based registry study of low-risk primiparous women.
    Herstad L; Klungsøyr K; Skjærven R; Tanbo T; Forsén L; Åbyholm T; Vangen S
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2016 Aug; 16():230. PubMed ID: 27535233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Maternal age and emergency operative deliveries at term: a population-based registry study among low-risk primiparous women.
    Herstad L; Klungsøyr K; Skjaerven R; Tanbo T; Forsén L; Åbyholm T; Vangen S
    BJOG; 2015 Nov; 122(12):1642-51. PubMed ID: 25100277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Vaginal breech delivery: results of a prospective registration study.
    Vistad I; Cvancarova M; Hustad BL; Henriksen T
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2013 Jul; 13():153. PubMed ID: 23883361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Macrosomia: mode of delivery and pregnancy outcome.
    Bjørstad AR; Irgens-Hansen K; Daltveit AK; Irgens LM
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2010 May; 89(5):664-9. PubMed ID: 20235897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Planned vaginal delivery versus elective caesarean section in singleton term breech presentation: a study of 1116 cases.
    Golfier F; Vaudoyer F; Ecochard R; Champion F; Audra P; Raudrant D
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2001 Oct; 98(2):186-92. PubMed ID: 11574129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of the mode of delivery on maternal and neonatal outcomes: a comparison between elective cesarean section and planned vaginal delivery in a low-risk obstetric population.
    Bodner K; Wierrani F; Grünberger W; Bodner-Adler B
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2011 Jun; 283(6):1193-8. PubMed ID: 20505947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Risk of Emergency Operations, Adverse Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes according to the Planned Gestational Age for Cesarean Delivery.
    Lee SM; Park JS; Jung YM; Kim SA; Ahn JH; Youm J; Park CW; Jun JK
    J Korean Med Sci; 2018 Feb; 33(7):e51. PubMed ID: 29359538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Higher risk for adverse obstetric outcomes among immigrants of African and Asian descent: a comparison study at a low-risk maternity hospital in Norway.
    Bakken KS; Skjeldal OH; Stray-Pedersen B
    Birth; 2015 Jun; 42(2):132-40. PubMed ID: 25847218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Scheduled cesarean delivery: maternal and neonatal risks in primiparous women in a community hospital setting.
    Quiroz LH; Chang H; Blomquist JL; Okoh YK; Handa VL
    Am J Perinatol; 2009 Apr; 26(4):271-7. PubMed ID: 19021093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Planned mode of delivery after previous cesarean section and short-term maternal and perinatal outcomes: A population-based record linkage cohort study in Scotland.
    Fitzpatrick KE; Kurinczuk JJ; Bhattacharya S; Quigley MA
    PLoS Med; 2019 Sep; 16(9):e1002913. PubMed ID: 31550245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Maternal and neonatal outcomes of attempted vaginal compared with planned cesarean delivery in triplet gestations.
    Lappen JR; Hackney DN; Bailit JL
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Oct; 215(4):493.e1-6. PubMed ID: 27166014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Elective cesarean delivery for term breech.
    Krebs L; Langhoff-Roos J
    Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Apr; 101(4):690-6. PubMed ID: 12681872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Perspectives on risk: Assessment of risk profiles and outcomes among women planning community birth in the United States.
    Bovbjerg ML; Cheyney M; Brown J; Cox KJ; Leeman L
    Birth; 2017 Sep; 44(3):209-221. PubMed ID: 28332220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Risk of Adverse Obstetric and Neonatal Outcomes by Maternal Age: Quantifying Individual and Population Level Risk Using Routine UK Maternity Data.
    Oakley L; Penn N; Pipi M; Oteng-Ntim E; Doyle P
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(10):e0164462. PubMed ID: 27716789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The mode of delivery in patients with preeclampsia at term subject to elective or emergency Cesarean section.
    Pacher J; Brix E; Lehner R
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2014 Feb; 289(2):263-7. PubMed ID: 23852616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Planned cesarean versus planned vaginal delivery at term: comparison of newborn infant outcomes.
    Kolås T; Saugstad OD; Daltveit AK; Nilsen ST; Øian P
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Dec; 195(6):1538-43. PubMed ID: 16846577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Maternal and newborn outcomes with elective induction of labor at term.
    Souter V; Painter I; Sitcov K; Caughey AB
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Mar; 220(3):273.e1-273.e11. PubMed ID: 30716284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Outcomes of term vaginal breech delivery.
    Doyle NM; Riggs JW; Ramin SM; Sosa MA; Gilstrap LC
    Am J Perinatol; 2005 Aug; 22(6):325-8. PubMed ID: 16118722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Maternal age and elective cesarean section in a low-risk population.
    Herstad L; Klungsøyr K; Skjærven R; Tanbo T; Eidem I; Forsén L; Åbyholm T; Vangen S
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2012 Jul; 91(7):816-23. PubMed ID: 22435923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A Comparative Study of the Spontaneous Labor Rate in Scheduled Elective Cesarean Section at 38 Weeks versus 39 Weeks of Gestation in Parturient with Previous Cesarean Section.
    Todumrong N; Somprasit C; Tanprasertkul C; Bhamarapravatana K; Suwannarurk K
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2016 Jul; 99 Suppl 4():S37-41. PubMed ID: 29916674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 161.