132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27535677)
1. SMT and TOFT Integrable After All: A Reply to Bizzarri and Cucina.
Bedessem B; Ruphy S
Acta Biotheor; 2017 Mar; 65(1):81-85. PubMed ID: 27535677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. SMT or TOFT? How the two main theories of carcinogenesis are made (artificially) incompatible.
Bedessem B; Ruphy S
Acta Biotheor; 2015 Sep; 63(3):257-67. PubMed ID: 25851566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. SMT and TOFT: Why and How They are Opposite and Incompatible Paradigms.
Bizzarri M; Cucina A
Acta Biotheor; 2016 Sep; 64(3):221-39. PubMed ID: 27283400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Cancer and the elusive cancer genes].
Sonnenschein C; Soto AM
Med Sci (Paris); 2014; 30(6-7):688-92. PubMed ID: 25014463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A cancer theory kerfuffle can lead to new lines of research.
Baker SG
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2015 Feb; 107(2):. PubMed ID: 25528755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Are the somatic mutation and tissue organization field theories of carcinogenesis incompatible?
Rosenfeld S
Cancer Inform; 2013; 12():221-9. PubMed ID: 24324325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Somatic Mutation Theory - Why it's Wrong for Most Cancers.
Brücher BL; Jamall IS
Cell Physiol Biochem; 2016; 38(5):1663-80. PubMed ID: 27160408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The tissue organization field theory of cancer: a testable replacement for the somatic mutation theory.
Soto AM; Sonnenschein C
Bioessays; 2011 May; 33(5):332-40. PubMed ID: 21503935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cancer Metastases: So Close and So Far.
Sonnenschein C; Soto AM
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2015 Nov; 107(11):. PubMed ID: 26283653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Carcinogenesis explained within the context of a theory of organisms.
Sonnenschein C; Soto AM
Prog Biophys Mol Biol; 2016 Oct; 122(1):70-76. PubMed ID: 27498170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Over a century of cancer research: Inconvenient truths and promising leads.
Sonnenschein C; Soto AM
PLoS Biol; 2020 Apr; 18(4):e3000670. PubMed ID: 32236102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Emergentism as a default: cancer as a problem of tissue organization.
Soto AM; Sonnenschein C
J Biosci; 2005 Feb; 30(1):103-18. PubMed ID: 15824446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An Integrative Approach Toward Biology, Organisms, and Cancer.
Sonnenschein C; Soto AM
Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1702():15-26. PubMed ID: 29119499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The cancer puzzle: Welcome to organicism.
Soto AM; Sonnenschein C
Prog Biophys Mol Biol; 2021 Oct; 165():114-119. PubMed ID: 34271028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Paradoxes in Carcinogenesis: There Is Light at the End of That Tunnel!
Soto AM; Sonnenschein C
Disrupt Sci Technol; 2013 May; 1(3):154-156. PubMed ID: 24587978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. New hypotheses for cancer generation and progression.
Mazzocca A; Fais S
Med Hypotheses; 2021 Jul; 152():110614. PubMed ID: 34087614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Paradoxical Behavior of Oncogenes Undermines the Somatic Mutation Theory.
Monti N; Verna R; Piombarolo A; Querqui A; Bizzarri M; Fedeli V
Biomolecules; 2022 Apr; 12(5):. PubMed ID: 35625590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Chaos and cancers. Theories concerning carcinogenesis.
Kwasniewski W; Stupak A; Kotarski J; Gozdzicak-Jozefiak A
Ginekol Pol; 2021; 92(4):318-321. PubMed ID: 33757157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An Emergence Framework of Carcinogenesis.
Sigston EAW; Williams BRG
Front Oncol; 2017; 7():198. PubMed ID: 28959682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. One hundred years of somatic mutation theory of carcinogenesis: is it time to switch?
Soto AM; Sonnenschein C
Bioessays; 2014 Jan; 36(1):118-20. PubMed ID: 24323923
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
