These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27535895)

  • 1. Reply to comment on 'Proton beam monitor chamber calibration'.
    Gomà C; Lorentini S; Meer D; Safai S
    Phys Med Biol; 2016 Sep; 61(17):6594-601. PubMed ID: 27535895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comment on 'Proton beam monitor chamber calibration'.
    Palmans H; Vatnitsky SM
    Phys Med Biol; 2016 Sep; 61(17):6585-93. PubMed ID: 27535790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Proton beam monitor chamber calibration.
    Gomà C; Lorentini S; Meer D; Safai S
    Phys Med Biol; 2014 Sep; 59(17):4961-71. PubMed ID: 25109620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. IAEA-AAPM TRS-483-based reference dosimetry of the new RefleXion biology-guided radiotherapy (BgRT) machine.
    Mirzakhanian L; Bassalow R; Zaks D; Huntzinger C; Seuntjens J
    Med Phys; 2021 Apr; 48(4):1884-1892. PubMed ID: 33296515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Consistency in quality correction factors for ionization chamber dosimetry in scanned proton beam therapy.
    Sorriaux J; Testa M; Paganetti H; Bertrand D; Lee JA; Palmans H; Vynckier S; Sterpin E
    Med Phys; 2017 Sep; 44(9):4919-4927. PubMed ID: 28656604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Experimental validation of beam quality correction factors for proton beams.
    Gomà C; Hofstetter-Boillat B; Safai S; Vörös S
    Phys Med Biol; 2015 Apr; 60(8):3207-16. PubMed ID: 25813370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of dosimetry recommendations for clinical proton beams.
    Medin J; Andreo P; Vynckier S
    Phys Med Biol; 2000 Nov; 45(11):3195-211. PubMed ID: 11098898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. kQ factors for ionization chamber dosimetry in clinical proton beams.
    Vatnitsky SM; Siebers JV; Miller DW
    Med Phys; 1996 Jan; 23(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 8700030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reply to comment on 'Lateral response heterogeneity of Bragg peak ionization chambers for narrow-beam photon and proton dosimetry'.
    Kuess P; Lechner W; Georg D; Palmans H
    Phys Med Biol; 2021 Aug; 66(16):. PubMed ID: 34341187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Monte Carlo calculation of perturbation correction factors for air-filled ionization chambers in clinical proton beams using TOPAS/GEANT.
    Baumann KS; Kaupa S; Bach C; Engenhart-Cabillic R; Zink K
    Z Med Phys; 2021 May; 31(2):175-191. PubMed ID: 33775521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Current best estimates of beam quality correction factors for reference dosimetry of clinical proton beams.
    Palmans H; Lourenço A; Medin J; Vatnitsky S; Andreo P
    Phys Med Biol; 2022 Sep; 67(19):. PubMed ID: 36096096
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Beam monitor calibration in scanned light-ion beams.
    Palmans H; Vatnitsky SM
    Med Phys; 2016 Nov; 43(11):5835. PubMed ID: 27806608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Correction factors for ionization chamber dosimetry in CyberKnife: machine-specific, plan-class, and clinical fields.
    Gago-Arias A; Antolin E; Fayos-Ferrer F; Simon R; Gonzalez-Castano DM; Palmans H; Sharpe P; Gomez F; Pardo-Montero J
    Med Phys; 2013 Jan; 40(1):011721. PubMed ID: 23298091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Consistency in reference radiotherapy dosimetry: resolution of an apparent conundrum when (60)Co is the reference quality for charged-particle and photon beams.
    Andreo P; Wulff J; Burns DT; Palmans H
    Phys Med Biol; 2013 Oct; 58(19):6593-621. PubMed ID: 24018471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Correction factors for A1SL ionization chamber dosimetry in TomoTherapy: machine-specific, plan-class, and clinical fields.
    Gago-Arias A; Rodriguez-Romero R; Sanchez-Rubio P; Miguel Gonzalez-Castano D; Gomez F; Nunez L; Palmans H; Sharpe P; Pardo-Montero J
    Med Phys; 2012 Apr; 39(4):1964-70. PubMed ID: 22482617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comments on 'The effective depth of cylindrical ionization chambers in water for clinical proton beams'.
    Palmans H
    Phys Med Biol; 2012 Nov; 57(21):7219-24. PubMed ID: 23059383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Chamber-quality factors in 60Co for three plane-parallel chambers for the dosimetry of electrons, protons and heavier charged particles: PENELOPE Monte Carlo simulations.
    Panettieri V; Sempau J; Andreo P
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Nov; 53(21):5917-26. PubMed ID: 18836218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. On the p(dis) correction factor for cylindrical chambers.
    Andreo P
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Mar; 55(5):L9-16; author reply L17-9. PubMed ID: 20157227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Monte Carlo calculation of beam quality correction factors in proton beams using FLUKA.
    Baumann KS; Derksen L; Witt M; Michael Burg J; Engenhart-Cabillic R; Zink K
    Phys Med Biol; 2021 Aug; 66(17):. PubMed ID: 34378546
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ionization chamber gradient effects in nonstandard beam configurations.
    Bouchard H; Seuntjens J; Carrier JF; Kawrakow I
    Med Phys; 2009 Oct; 36(10):4654-63. PubMed ID: 19928097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.