These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27535900)

  • 21. The perceptions of medical researchers on qualitative methodologies.
    Taquette SR; Minayo MC; Rodrigues Ade O
    Cad Saude Publica; 2015 Apr; 31(4):722-32. PubMed ID: 25945982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Is It Time to Share Qualitative Research Data?
    DuBois JM; Strait M; Walsh H
    Qual Psychol; 2018 Nov; 5(3):380-393. PubMed ID: 30662922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Bumps and bridges on the road to responsible sharing of clinical trial data.
    Berlin JA; Morris S; Rockhold F; Askie L; Ghersi D; Waldstreicher J
    Clin Trials; 2014 Feb; 11(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 24408901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Preparing individual patient data from clinical trials for sharing: the GlaxoSmithKline approach.
    Hughes S; Wells K; McSorley P; Freeman A
    Pharm Stat; 2014; 13(3):179-83. PubMed ID: 24668938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Factors that influence data sharing through data sharing platforms: A qualitative study on the views and experiences of cohort holders and platform developers.
    Devriendt T; Borry P; Shabani M
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(7):e0254202. PubMed ID: 34214146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Sharing study materials in health and medical research.
    DeVito NJ; Morton C; Cashin AG; Richards GC; Lee H
    BMJ Evid Based Med; 2023 Aug; 28(4):255-259. PubMed ID: 36162960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Factors affecting willingness to share electronic health data among California consumers.
    Kim KK; Sankar P; Wilson MD; Haynes SC
    BMC Med Ethics; 2017 Apr; 18(1):25. PubMed ID: 28376801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Quality of qualitative studies centred on patients in family practice: a systematic review.
    Cambon B; Vorilhon P; Michel L; Cadwallader JS; Aubin-Auger I; Pereira B; Vaillant Roussel H
    Fam Pract; 2016 Dec; 33(6):580-587. PubMed ID: 27623689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A Guide to Field Notes for Qualitative Research: Context and Conversation.
    Phillippi J; Lauderdale J
    Qual Health Res; 2018 Feb; 28(3):381-388. PubMed ID: 29298584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Perceived Benefits, Harms, and Views About How to Share Data Responsibly: A Qualitative Study of Experiences With and Attitudes Toward Data Sharing Among Research Staff and Community Representatives in Thailand.
    Cheah PY; Tangseefa D; Somsaman A; Chunsuttiwat T; Nosten F; Day NP; Bull S; Parker M
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2015 Jul; 10(3):278-89. PubMed ID: 26297749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Extent, Awareness and Perception of Dissemination Bias in Qualitative Research: An Explorative Survey.
    Toews I; Glenton C; Lewin S; Berg RC; Noyes J; Booth A; Marusic A; Malicki M; Munthe-Kaas HM; Meerpohl JJ
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(8):e0159290. PubMed ID: 27487090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. District decision-making for health in low-income settings: a qualitative study in Uttar Pradesh, India, on engaging the private health sector in sharing health-related data.
    Gautham M; Spicer N; Subharwal M; Gupta S; Srivastava A; Bhattacharyya S; Avan BI; Schellenberg J
    Health Policy Plan; 2016 Sep; 31 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):ii35-ii46. PubMed ID: 27591205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Sharing all types of clinical data and harmonizing journal standards.
    Barbui C
    BMC Med; 2016 Apr; 14():63. PubMed ID: 27038634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Ethical issues in health-care inquiry: a discussion paper.
    Ignacio JJ; Taylor BJ
    Int J Nurs Pract; 2013 Feb; 19 Suppl 1():56-61. PubMed ID: 23425380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. When open data closes the door: A critical examination of the past, present and the potential future for open data guidelines in journals.
    Prosser AMB; Hamshaw RJT; Meyer J; Bagnall R; Blackwood L; Huysamen M; Jordan A; Vasileiou K; Walter Z
    Br J Soc Psychol; 2023 Oct; 62(4):1635-1653. PubMed ID: 36076340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A Guide to Writing a Qualitative Systematic Review Protocol to Enhance Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing and Health Care.
    Butler A; Hall H; Copnell B
    Worldviews Evid Based Nurs; 2016 Jun; 13(3):241-9. PubMed ID: 26790142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Qualitative research: the "what," "why," "who," and "how"!
    Cypress BS
    Dimens Crit Care Nurs; 2015; 34(6):356-61. PubMed ID: 26436302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Critically appraising qualitative research: a guide for clinicians more familiar with quantitative techniques.
    Kisely S; Kendall E
    Australas Psychiatry; 2011 Aug; 19(4):364-7. PubMed ID: 21864012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparison of consumers' views on electronic data sharing for healthcare and research.
    Kim KK; Joseph JG; Ohno-Machado L
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2015 Jul; 22(4):821-30. PubMed ID: 25829461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Using qualitative methods in research with people who have intellectual disabilities.
    Beail N; Williams K
    J Appl Res Intellect Disabil; 2014 Mar; 27(2):85-96. PubMed ID: 24497301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.