These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2753646)

  • 1. Evaluation of ultrafast CT scanning of the adult abdomen.
    Goldberg HI; Gould RG; Feuerstein IM; Sigeti JS; Lipton MJ
    Invest Radiol; 1989 Jul; 24(7):537-43. PubMed ID: 2753646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Does a combination of dose modulation with fast gantry rotation time limit CT image quality?
    Israel GM; Herlihy S; Rubinowitz AN; Cornfeld D; Brink J
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Jul; 191(1):140-4. PubMed ID: 18562737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Image quality of conventional images of dual-layer SPECTRAL CT: A phantom study.
    van Ommen F; Bennink E; Vlassenbroek A; Dankbaar JW; Schilham AMR; Viergever MA; de Jong HWAM
    Med Phys; 2018 Jul; 45(7):3031-3042. PubMed ID: 29749624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sixteen-detector row CT of abdomen and pelvis: study for optimization of Z-axis modulation technique performed in 153 patients.
    Kalra MK; Maher MM; Kamath RS; Horiuchi T; Toth TL; Halpern EF; Saini S
    Radiology; 2004 Oct; 233(1):241-9. PubMed ID: 15454622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quality of routine diagnostic abdominal images generated from a novel detector-based spectral CT scanner: a technical report on a phantom and clinical study.
    Hojjati M; Van Hedent S; Rassouli N; Tatsuoka C; Jordan D; Dhanantwari A; Rajiah P
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2017 Nov; 42(11):2752-2759. PubMed ID: 28493070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of Motion Artifacts on CT Images Obtained in the Ultrafast Scan Mode and Conventional Scan Mode for Unconscious Patients in the Emergency Department.
    Takayanagi T; Suzuki S; Katada Y; Ishikawa T; Fukui R; Yamamoto Y; Abe O
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2019 Oct; 213(4):W153-W161. PubMed ID: 31166767
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Virtual unenhanced images of the abdomen with second-generation dual-source dual-energy computed tomography: image quality and liver lesion detection.
    De Cecco CN; Darnell A; Macías N; Ayuso JR; Rodríguez S; Rimola J; Pagés M; García-Criado A; Rengo M; Laghi A; Ayuso C
    Invest Radiol; 2013 Jan; 48(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 23070097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Thoracic-abdominal imaging with a novel dual-layer spectral detector CT: intra-individual comparison of image quality and radiation dose with 128-row single-energy acquisition.
    Haneder S; Siedek F; Doerner J; Pahn G; Grosse Hokamp N; Maintz D; Wybranski C
    Acta Radiol; 2018 Dec; 59(12):1458-1465. PubMed ID: 29569933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. CT of the Abdomen with Reduced Tube Voltage in Adults: A Practical Approach.
    Seyal AR; Arslanoglu A; Abboud SF; Sahin A; Horowitz JM; Yaghmai V
    Radiographics; 2015; 35(7):1922-39. PubMed ID: 26473536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accuracy of image fusion of normal upper abdominal organs visualized with PET/CT.
    Nakamoto Y; Tatsumi M; Cohade C; Osman M; Marshall LT; Wahl RL
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2003 Apr; 30(4):597-602. PubMed ID: 12548443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Semierect computed tomography of the abdomen using the Imatron ultrafast CT scanner.
    Feuerstein IM; Margulis AR
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1987; 11(6):1107-8. PubMed ID: 2960705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. CT of the chest and abdomen in patients on mechanical pulmonary ventilators: quality of images made at 0.6 vs 1.0 sec.
    Posniak HV; Olson MC; Demos TC; Pierce KL; Kalbhen CL
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Nov; 163(5):1073-7. PubMed ID: 7976877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Performance evaluation of an 85-cm-bore X-ray computed tomography scanner designed for radiation oncology and comparison with current diagnostic CT scanners.
    Garcia-Ramirez JL; Mutic S; Dempsey JF; Low DA; Purdy JA
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2002 Mar; 52(4):1123-31. PubMed ID: 11958910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessment of 70-keV virtual monoenergetic spectral images in abdominal CT imaging: A comparison study to conventional polychromatic 120-kVp images.
    Rassouli N; Chalian H; Rajiah P; Dhanantwari A; Landeras L
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2017 Oct; 42(10):2579-2586. PubMed ID: 28421243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Abdominal CT: comparison of low-dose CT with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and routine-dose CT with filtered back projection in 53 patients.
    Sagara Y; Hara AK; Pavlicek W; Silva AC; Paden RG; Wu Q
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Sep; 195(3):713-9. PubMed ID: 20729451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Multi-slice spiral CT of the abdomen in oncological patients: influence of table support and detector configuration on image quality and radiation exposure].
    Wessling J; Fischbach R; Ludwig K; Juergens KU; Schaller S; Fallenberg EM; Lenzen H; Heindel W
    Rofo; 2001 Apr; 173(4):373-8. PubMed ID: 11367849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Technical Note: Evaluation of a 160-mm/256-row CT scanner for whole-heart quantitative myocardial perfusion imaging.
    So A; Imai Y; Nett B; Jackson J; Nett L; Hsieh J; Wisenberg G; Teefy P; Yadegari A; Islam A; Lee TY
    Med Phys; 2016 Aug; 43(8):4821. PubMed ID: 27487900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Image quality and dose comparison among screen-film, computed, and CT scanned projection radiography: applications to CT urography.
    McCollough CH; Bruesewitz MR; Vrtiska TJ; King BF; LeRoy AJ; Quam JP; Hattery RR
    Radiology; 2001 Nov; 221(2):395-403. PubMed ID: 11687682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Third version of vendor-specific model-based iterativereconstruction (Veo 3.0): evaluation of CT image quality in the abdomen using new noise reduction presets and varied slice optimization.
    Telesmanich ME; Jensen CT; Enriquez JL; Wagner-Bartak NA; Liu X; Le O; Wei W; Chandler AG; Tamm EP
    Br J Radiol; 2017 Aug; 90(1077):20170188. PubMed ID: 28707531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Single-detector helical CT in PET-CT: assessment of image quality.
    Römer W; Chung M; Chan A; Townsend DW; Torok F; McCook B; Federle MP; Avril N
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 Jun; 182(6):1571-7. PubMed ID: 15150012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.