These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27536911)
1. Systematic Analysis of Clinical Outcomes of Bilateral Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy With Preoperative Modeling and Postoperative Orthodontic in the Treatment of Mandibular Protrusion. Li Y; Sun X; Teng L; Xu J; Lu J; Ding B; Zhang C; Xie F; Sun X J Craniofac Surg; 2017 Nov; 28(8):2083-2087. PubMed ID: 27536911 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Systematic analysis of clinical outcomes of anterior maxillary and mandibular subapical osteotomy with preoperative modeling in the treatment of bimaxillary protrusion. Xie F; Teng L; Jin X; Zheng J; Xu J; Lu J; Zhang C; Xu M; Zeng H; Li S; Sun X J Craniofac Surg; 2013 Nov; 24(6):1980-6. PubMed ID: 24220386 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparative study of skeletal stability between bicortical resorbable and titanium screw fixation after sagittal split ramus osteotomy for mandibular prognathism. Paeng JY; Hong J; Kim CS; Kim MJ J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2012 Dec; 40(8):660-4. PubMed ID: 22209495 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Skeletal stability of patients undergoing maxillomandibular advancement for treatment of obstructive sleep apnea. Lee SH; Kaban LB; Lahey ET J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Apr; 73(4):694-700. PubMed ID: 25622883 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The influence of bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy on submental-cervical aesthetics. Soydan SS; Uckan S; Ustdal A; Bayram B; Bayrak B J Oral Rehabil; 2014 Nov; 41(11):816-21. PubMed ID: 24946129 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Orthognathic surgery for correction of patients with mandibular excess: don't forget to assess the gonial angle. Guglielmi M; Schneider KM; Iannetti G; Feng C; Martinez AY J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Jun; 71(6):1063-72. PubMed ID: 23541992 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Variation of plate fixation for mandibular advancement with intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy using endoscopically assisted intraoral rigid or semi-rigid internal fixation: Case series study: Postoperative condylar seating control for mandibular advancement. Hara S; Mitsugi M; Tatemoto Y J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Dec; 43(10):2012-6. PubMed ID: 26610634 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessment of ramus, condyle, masseter muscle, and occlusal force before and after sagittal split ramus osteotomy in patients with mandibular prognathism. Ueki K; Okabe K; Mukozawa A; Miyazaki M; Marukawa K; Hashiba Y; Nakagawa K; Yamamoto E Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Nov; 108(5):679-86. PubMed ID: 19699116 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The influence of the closing and opening muscle groups of jaw condyle biomechanics after mandible bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy. Xiangdong QI; Limin MA; Shizhen Z J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2012 Sep; 40(6):e159-64. PubMed ID: 21907586 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Modification of the sagittal split osteotomy of the mandibular ramus: mobilizing vertical osteotomy of the internal ramus segment. Ricard D; Ferri J J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Aug; 67(8):1691-9. PubMed ID: 19615584 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative Study of Mandible Ramus Morphology Using 3-dimensional CT in Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy. Hirota M; Suga K; Shibahara T Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 2018 Nov; 59(4):237-245. PubMed ID: 30333371 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Does mandibular osteotomy affect gonial angle in patients with class III deformity? Vertical ramus osteotomy versus sagittal split osteotomy. Tabrizi R; Pakshir H; Behnia H; Akhlaghi S; Shahsavari N Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Aug; 45(8):992-6. PubMed ID: 27012604 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of bony changes observed in mandibular osteotomy lines and mandibular condyles following bilateral sagittal ramus osteotomy by fractal analysis. Çolak S; Altan A; Bayrak S; Akbulut N Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2023 Sep; 27(3):519-526. PubMed ID: 35831722 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Stability of skeletal Class II correction with 2 surgical techniques: the sagittal split ramus osteotomy and the total mandibular subapical alveolar osteotomy. Pangrazio-Kulbersh V; Berger JL; Kaczynski R; Shunock M Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Aug; 120(2):134-43. PubMed ID: 11500654 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. "Split to save": Accessing mandibular lesions using sagittal split osteotomy with virtual surgical planning. Liu SY; Sidell D; Huon LK; Torre C Ear Nose Throat J; 2018 Mar; 97(3):91-96. PubMed ID: 29554403 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A Modified Method of Proximal Segment Alignment After Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy for Patients With Mandibular Asymmetry. Liu Z; Shen S; Xia JJ; Wang X J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Dec; 73(12):2399-2407. PubMed ID: 26026710 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Postoperative stability after sagittal split ramus osteotomies for a mandibular setback with monocortical plate fixation or bicortical screw fixation. Chung IH; Yoo CK; Lee EK; Ihm JA; Park CJ; Lim JS; Hwang KG J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Mar; 66(3):446-52. PubMed ID: 18280376 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Stability of pre-orthodontic orthognathic surgery depending on mandibular surgical techniques: SSRO vs IVRO. Choi SH; Yoo HJ; Lee JY; Jung YS; Choi JW; Lee KJ J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2016 Sep; 44(9):1209-15. PubMed ID: 27524382 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Contrast analysis of different sagittal split ramus osteotomy methods in correcting mandibular prognathism]. Teng L; Ren M; Zhang Z Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2006 Jul; 20(7):709-12. PubMed ID: 16892802 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Morphological changes in the temporomandibular joint before and after sagittal splitting ramus osteotomy of the mandible for skeletal mandibular protrusion. Enami K; Yamada K; Kageyama T; Taguchi A Cranio; 2013 Apr; 31(2):123-32. PubMed ID: 23795402 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]