These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
385 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27537531)
1. A Systematic Review to Assess Resection Margin Status After Abdominoperineal Excision and Pelvic Exenteration for Rectal Cancer. Simillis C; Baird DL; Kontovounisios C; Pawa N; Brown G; Rasheed S; Tekkis PP Ann Surg; 2017 Feb; 265(2):291-299. PubMed ID: 27537531 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Oncological outcomes after total mesorectal excision for cure for cancer of the lower rectum: anterior vs. abdominoperineal resection. Wibe A; Syse A; Andersen E; Tretli S; Myrvold HE; Søreide O; Dis Colon Rectum; 2004 Jan; 47(1):48-58. PubMed ID: 14719151 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Laparoscopic extralevator abdominoperineal resection versus laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection for lower rectal cancer: A retrospective comparative study from China. Qi X; Liu M; Tan F; Xu K; Yao Z; Zhang N; Yang H; Zhang C; Xing J; Cui M; Su X Int J Surg; 2019 Nov; 71():158-165. PubMed ID: 31526895 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A pilot randomized study comparing extralevator with conventional abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiation. Seshadri RA; West NP; Sundersingh S Colorectal Dis; 2017 Jul; 19(7):O253-O262. PubMed ID: 28503808 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Factors associated with oncologic outcomes after abdominoperineal resection compared with restorative resection for low rectal cancer: patient- and tumor-related or technical factors only? Reshef A; Lavery I; Kiran RP Dis Colon Rectum; 2012 Jan; 55(1):51-8. PubMed ID: 22156867 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Patients with low rectal cancer treated by abdominoperineal excision have worse tumors and higher involved margin rates compared with patients treated by anterior resection. Shihab OC; Brown G; Daniels IR; Heald RJ; Quirke P; Moran BJ Dis Colon Rectum; 2010 Jan; 53(1):53-6. PubMed ID: 20010351 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Systematic review of outcomes following pelvic exenteration for the treatment of primary and recurrent locally advanced rectal cancer. Platt E; Dovell G; Smolarek S Tech Coloproctol; 2018 Nov; 22(11):835-845. PubMed ID: 30506497 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quality of life of survivors after pelvic exenteration for rectal cancer. Austin KK; Young JM; Solomon MJ Dis Colon Rectum; 2010 Aug; 53(8):1121-6. PubMed ID: 20628274 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Transperineal retropubic approach in total pelvic exenteration for advanced and recurrent colorectal and anal cancer involving the penile base: technique and outcomes. Mehta AM; Hellawell G; Burling D; Littler S; Antoniou A; Jenkins JT Tech Coloproctol; 2018 Sep; 22(9):663-671. PubMed ID: 30306276 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Validation of MRI and Surgical Decision Making to Predict a Complete Resection in Pelvic Exenteration for Recurrent Rectal Cancer. Brown WE; Koh CE; Badgery-Parker T; Solomon MJ Dis Colon Rectum; 2017 Feb; 60(2):144-151. PubMed ID: 28059910 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Persistent involvement of anterior mesorectal fascia in carcinoma rectum - extended resection of rectum vs total pelvic exenteration: results from a single-centre retrospective study. Verma K; Engineer R; Ostwal V; Kumar S; Arya S; Desouza AL; Saklani AP Colorectal Dis; 2018 Dec; 20(12):1070-1077. PubMed ID: 29985547 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Outcomes of pelvic exenteration for recurrent and primary locally advanced rectal cancer. Rottoli M; Vallicelli C; Boschi L; Poggioli G Int J Surg; 2017 Dec; 48():69-73. PubMed ID: 28987560 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A systematic review of the pathological determinants of outcome following resection by pelvic exenteration of locally advanced and locally recurrent rectal cancer. Gould LE; Pring ET; Drami I; Moorghen M; Naghibi M; Jenkins JT; Steele CW; Roxburgh CS Int J Surg; 2022 Aug; 104():106738. PubMed ID: 35781038 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Impact of Tumour Distance From the Anal Verge on Clinical Management and Outcomes in Patients Having a Curative Resection for Rectal Cancer. Khan MAS; Ang CW; Hakeem AR; Scott N; Saunders RN; Botterill I J Gastrointest Surg; 2017 Dec; 21(12):2056-2065. PubMed ID: 28924962 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of published rates of resection margin involvement and intra-operative perforation between standard and 'cylindrical' abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer. Krishna A; Rickard MJ; Keshava A; Dent OF; Chapuis PH Colorectal Dis; 2013 Jan; 15(1):57-65. PubMed ID: 22757637 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Indications and outcome of pelvic exenteration for locally advanced primary and recurrent rectal cancer. Bhangu A; Ali SM; Brown G; Nicholls RJ; Tekkis P Ann Surg; 2014 Feb; 259(2):315-22. PubMed ID: 23478530 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Hartmann's procedure vs abdominoperineal resection with intersphincteric dissection in patients with rectal cancer: a randomized multicentre trial (HAPIrect). Smedh K; Sverrisson I; Chabok A; Nikberg M; BMC Surg; 2016 Jul; 16(1):43. PubMed ID: 27401339 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A qualitative study of the development of a multidisciplinary case conference review methodology to reduce involved margins in pelvic exenteration surgery for recurrent rectal cancer. van Ramshorst GH; O'Shannassy S; Brown WE; Kench JG; Solomon MJ Colorectal Dis; 2018 Nov; 20(11):1004-1013. PubMed ID: 29920909 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]