382 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27537531)
1. A Systematic Review to Assess Resection Margin Status After Abdominoperineal Excision and Pelvic Exenteration for Rectal Cancer.
Simillis C; Baird DL; Kontovounisios C; Pawa N; Brown G; Rasheed S; Tekkis PP
Ann Surg; 2017 Feb; 265(2):291-299. PubMed ID: 27537531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Oncological outcomes after total mesorectal excision for cure for cancer of the lower rectum: anterior vs. abdominoperineal resection.
Wibe A; Syse A; Andersen E; Tretli S; Myrvold HE; Søreide O;
Dis Colon Rectum; 2004 Jan; 47(1):48-58. PubMed ID: 14719151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Laparoscopic extralevator abdominoperineal resection versus laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection for lower rectal cancer: A retrospective comparative study from China.
Qi X; Liu M; Tan F; Xu K; Yao Z; Zhang N; Yang H; Zhang C; Xing J; Cui M; Su X
Int J Surg; 2019 Nov; 71():158-165. PubMed ID: 31526895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A pilot randomized study comparing extralevator with conventional abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiation.
Seshadri RA; West NP; Sundersingh S
Colorectal Dis; 2017 Jul; 19(7):O253-O262. PubMed ID: 28503808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Factors associated with oncologic outcomes after abdominoperineal resection compared with restorative resection for low rectal cancer: patient- and tumor-related or technical factors only?
Reshef A; Lavery I; Kiran RP
Dis Colon Rectum; 2012 Jan; 55(1):51-8. PubMed ID: 22156867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Robot-Assisted Abdominoperineal Resection: Clinical, Pathologic, and Oncologic Outcomes.
Eftaiha SM; Pai A; Sulo S; Park JJ; Prasad LM; Marecik SJ
Dis Colon Rectum; 2016 Jul; 59(7):607-14. PubMed ID: 27270512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Patients with low rectal cancer treated by abdominoperineal excision have worse tumors and higher involved margin rates compared with patients treated by anterior resection.
Shihab OC; Brown G; Daniels IR; Heald RJ; Quirke P; Moran BJ
Dis Colon Rectum; 2010 Jan; 53(1):53-6. PubMed ID: 20010351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Systematic review of outcomes following pelvic exenteration for the treatment of primary and recurrent locally advanced rectal cancer.
Platt E; Dovell G; Smolarek S
Tech Coloproctol; 2018 Nov; 22(11):835-845. PubMed ID: 30506497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quality of life of survivors after pelvic exenteration for rectal cancer.
Austin KK; Young JM; Solomon MJ
Dis Colon Rectum; 2010 Aug; 53(8):1121-6. PubMed ID: 20628274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Transperineal retropubic approach in total pelvic exenteration for advanced and recurrent colorectal and anal cancer involving the penile base: technique and outcomes.
Mehta AM; Hellawell G; Burling D; Littler S; Antoniou A; Jenkins JT
Tech Coloproctol; 2018 Sep; 22(9):663-671. PubMed ID: 30306276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Validation of MRI and Surgical Decision Making to Predict a Complete Resection in Pelvic Exenteration for Recurrent Rectal Cancer.
Brown WE; Koh CE; Badgery-Parker T; Solomon MJ
Dis Colon Rectum; 2017 Feb; 60(2):144-151. PubMed ID: 28059910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Persistent involvement of anterior mesorectal fascia in carcinoma rectum - extended resection of rectum vs total pelvic exenteration: results from a single-centre retrospective study.
Verma K; Engineer R; Ostwal V; Kumar S; Arya S; Desouza AL; Saklani AP
Colorectal Dis; 2018 Dec; 20(12):1070-1077. PubMed ID: 29985547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Outcomes of pelvic exenteration for recurrent and primary locally advanced rectal cancer.
Rottoli M; Vallicelli C; Boschi L; Poggioli G
Int J Surg; 2017 Dec; 48():69-73. PubMed ID: 28987560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A systematic review of the pathological determinants of outcome following resection by pelvic exenteration of locally advanced and locally recurrent rectal cancer.
Gould LE; Pring ET; Drami I; Moorghen M; Naghibi M; Jenkins JT; Steele CW; Roxburgh CS
Int J Surg; 2022 Aug; 104():106738. PubMed ID: 35781038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Impact of Tumour Distance From the Anal Verge on Clinical Management and Outcomes in Patients Having a Curative Resection for Rectal Cancer.
Khan MAS; Ang CW; Hakeem AR; Scott N; Saunders RN; Botterill I
J Gastrointest Surg; 2017 Dec; 21(12):2056-2065. PubMed ID: 28924962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of published rates of resection margin involvement and intra-operative perforation between standard and 'cylindrical' abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer.
Krishna A; Rickard MJ; Keshava A; Dent OF; Chapuis PH
Colorectal Dis; 2013 Jan; 15(1):57-65. PubMed ID: 22757637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Indications and outcome of pelvic exenteration for locally advanced primary and recurrent rectal cancer.
Bhangu A; Ali SM; Brown G; Nicholls RJ; Tekkis P
Ann Surg; 2014 Feb; 259(2):315-22. PubMed ID: 23478530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Factors affecting outcomes following pelvic exenteration for locally recurrent rectal cancer.
PelvEx Collaborative
Br J Surg; 2018 May; 105(6):650-657. PubMed ID: 29529336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Hartmann's procedure vs abdominoperineal resection with intersphincteric dissection in patients with rectal cancer: a randomized multicentre trial (HAPIrect).
Smedh K; Sverrisson I; Chabok A; Nikberg M;
BMC Surg; 2016 Jul; 16(1):43. PubMed ID: 27401339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A qualitative study of the development of a multidisciplinary case conference review methodology to reduce involved margins in pelvic exenteration surgery for recurrent rectal cancer.
van Ramshorst GH; O'Shannassy S; Brown WE; Kench JG; Solomon MJ
Colorectal Dis; 2018 Nov; 20(11):1004-1013. PubMed ID: 29920909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
