These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2753830)

  • 1. Effect of electrical pulse shape on AVCN unit responses to cochlear stimulation.
    Wiler JA; Clopton BM; Mikhail MA
    Hear Res; 1989 Jun; 39(3):251-61. PubMed ID: 2753830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evoked vertex and inferior colliculus responses to electrical stimulation of the cochlear nucleus.
    Shore SE; Wiler JA; Anderson DJ
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1990 Jul; 99(7 Pt 1):571-6. PubMed ID: 2369041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Electrical cochlear stimulation in the deaf cat: comparisons between psychophysical and central auditory neuronal thresholds.
    Beitel RE; Snyder RL; Schreiner CE; Raggio MW; Leake PA
    J Neurophysiol; 2000 Apr; 83(4):2145-62. PubMed ID: 10758124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Stimulation of efferents alters the cochlear microphonic and the sound-induced resistance changes measured in scale media of the guinea pig.
    Mountain DC; Geisler CD; Hubbard AE
    Hear Res; 1980 Oct; 3(3):231-40. PubMed ID: 7440426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of Pulse Shape and Polarity on Sensitivity to Cochlear Implant Stimulation: A Chronic Study in Guinea Pigs.
    Macherey O; Cazals Y
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2016; 894():133-142. PubMed ID: 27080654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A new rapid component in the cochlear response to brief electrical efferent stimulation: CM and otoacoustic observations.
    Kemp DT; Souter M
    Hear Res; 1988 Jul; 34(1):49-62. PubMed ID: 3403385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Diverse responses of single auditory afferent fibres to electrical stimulation of the inferior colliculus in guinea-pig.
    Mulders WH; Robertson D
    Exp Brain Res; 2005 Jan; 160(2):235-44. PubMed ID: 15309356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of electrical stimulation of the olivo cochlear bundle at the cochlear level.
    Buño W; García-Ausit E
    Acta Neurol Latinoam; 1970; 16(1):125-38. PubMed ID: 5538050
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Responses of medial olivocochlear neurons. Specifying the central pathways of the medial olivocochlear reflex.
    Brown MC; de Venecia RK; Guinan JJ
    Exp Brain Res; 2003 Dec; 153(4):491-8. PubMed ID: 14557911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Phase-locked responses of cochlear nucleus units to electrical stimulation through a cochlear implant.
    Glass I
    Exp Brain Res; 1984; 55(2):386-90. PubMed ID: 6547677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Guinea pig auditory nerve response triggered by a high density electrode array.
    Jolly CN; Clopton BM; Spelman FA; Lineaweaver SK
    Med Prog Technol; 1997; 21 Suppl():13-23. PubMed ID: 9413824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Effect of intravenous injection of aspirin on the cochlea].
    Kumagai M
    Hokkaido Igaku Zasshi; 1992 Mar; 67(2):216-33. PubMed ID: 1597302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Neuronal responses in cat primary auditory cortex to electrical cochlear stimulation. I. Intensity dependence of firing rate and response latency.
    Raggio MW; Schreiner CE
    J Neurophysiol; 1994 Nov; 72(5):2334-59. PubMed ID: 7884463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of shorter pulse duration in cochlear neural activation with an 810-nm near-infrared laser.
    Wang J; Tian L; Lu J; Xia M; Wei Y
    Lasers Med Sci; 2017 Feb; 32(2):389-396. PubMed ID: 27995385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Spectrotemporal receptive fields of neurons in cochlear nucleus of guinea pig.
    Clopton BM; Backoff PM
    Hear Res; 1991 Apr; 52(2):329-44. PubMed ID: 2061224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Direct electrical stimulation of the cochlear nucleus: surface vs. penetrating stimulation.
    el-Kashlan HK; Niparko JK; Altschuler RA; Miller JM
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1991 Oct; 105(4):533-43. PubMed ID: 1762791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. On the origin of the compound action potentials (N1, N2) of the cochlea of the rat.
    Møller AR
    Exp Neurol; 1983 Jun; 80(3):633-44. PubMed ID: 6852156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Discharge properties of identified cochlear nucleus neurons and auditory nerve fibers in response to repetitive electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve.
    Babalian AL; Ryugo DK; Rouiller EM
    Exp Brain Res; 2003 Dec; 153(4):452-60. PubMed ID: 12955378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Responses of cochlear nucleus units to electrical stimulation through a cochlear prosthesis: channel interaction.
    Glass I
    Hear Res; 1985 Feb; 17(2):115-26. PubMed ID: 3839235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of current waveforms for the electrical stimulation of residual low frequency hearing.
    McAnally KI; Brown M; Clark GM
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1997 Nov; 117(6):831-5. PubMed ID: 9442822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.