377 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27538553)
1. Evaluation of marginal/internal fit of chrome-cobalt crowns: Direct laser metal sintering versus computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing.
Gunsoy S; Ulusoy M
Niger J Clin Pract; 2016; 19(5):636-44. PubMed ID: 27538553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of production method on surface roughness, marginal and internal fit, and retention of cobalt-chromium single crowns.
Lövgren N; Roxner R; Klemendz S; Larsson C
J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Jul; 118(1):95-101. PubMed ID: 28024818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Internal fit of single crowns produced by CAD-CAM and lost-wax metal casting technique assessed by the triple-scan protocol.
Dahl BE; Rønold HJ; Dahl JE
J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Mar; 117(3):400-404. PubMed ID: 27692584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical marginal and internal fit of metal ceramic crowns fabricated with a selective laser melting technology.
Huang Z; Zhang L; Zhu J; Zhang X
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Jun; 113(6):623-7. PubMed ID: 25794918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Digital evaluation of marginal and internal fit of single-crown fixed dental prostheses.
Dahl BE; Dahl JE; Rønold HJ
Eur J Oral Sci; 2018 Dec; 126(6):512-517. PubMed ID: 30298624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A microcomputed tomography evaluation of the marginal fit of cobalt-chromium alloy copings fabricated by new manufacturing techniques and alloy systems.
Kim EH; Lee DH; Kwon SM; Kwon TY
J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Mar; 117(3):393-399. PubMed ID: 27677219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Selective laser sintering versus conventional lost-wax casting for single metal copings: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Yang J; Li H; Xu L; Wang Y
J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Nov; 128(5):897-904. PubMed ID: 33789799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Influence of manufacturing technique on marginal fit of cobalt chromium restorations: An
Sarda AS; Bedia SV
Indian J Dent Res; 2021; 32(4):495-499. PubMed ID: 35645078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical marginal and internal adaptation of CAD/CAM milling, laser sintering, and cast metal ceramic crowns.
Tamac E; Toksavul S; Toman M
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Oct; 112(4):909-13. PubMed ID: 24819532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of the fit of metal copings fabricated using stereolithography.
Kim SB; Kim NH; Kim JH; Moon HS
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Nov; 120(5):693-698. PubMed ID: 29807735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of marginal and internal gaps of metal ceramic crowns obtained from conventional impressions and casting techniques with those obtained from digital techniques.
Rai R; Kumar SA; Prabhu R; Govindan RT; Tanveer FM
Indian J Dent Res; 2017; 28(3):291-297. PubMed ID: 28721994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of the Marginal Fit of Cobalt-Chromium Metal-Ceramic Crowns Fabricated by CAD/CAM Techniques and Conventional Methods at Three Production Stages.
Real-Voltas F; Romano-Cardozo E; Figueras-Alvarez O; Brufau-de Barbera M; Cabratosa-Termes J
Int J Prosthodont; 2017; 30(3):304–305. PubMed ID: 28319213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of manufacturing techniques on the marginal and internal fit of cobalt-chromium implant-supported multiunit frameworks.
Akçin ET; Güncü MB; Aktaş G; Aslan Y
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Nov; 120(5):715-720. PubMed ID: 30017153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Internal fit of three-unit fixed dental prostheses produced by computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing and the lost-wax metal casting technique assessed using the triple-scan protocol.
Dahl BE; Dahl JE; Rønold HJ
Eur J Oral Sci; 2018 Feb; 126(1):66-73. PubMed ID: 29171091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of the Marginal and Internal Fit of Implant-Supported Metal Copings Fabricated with 3 Different Techniques: An In Vitro Study.
Yildirim B; Paken G
J Prosthodont; 2019 Mar; 28(3):315-320. PubMed ID: 30667169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Marginal and internal fit of pressed ceramic crowns made from conventional and computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing wax patterns: An in vitro comparison.
Shamseddine L; Mortada R; Rifai K; Chidiac JJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Aug; 116(2):242-8. PubMed ID: 26948080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Effect of Milling Metal Versus Milling Wax on Implant Framework Retention and Adaptation.
Ghodsi S; Pirmoazen S; Beyabanaki E; Rostami M; Alikhasi M
J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e739-e743. PubMed ID: 29855135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Micro-computed tomography evaluation of marginal fit of lithium disilicate crowns fabricated by using chairside CAD/CAM systems or the heat-pressing technique.
Neves FD; Prado CJ; Prudente MS; Carneiro TA; Zancopé K; Davi LR; Mendonça G; Cooper LF; Soares CJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov; 112(5):1134-40. PubMed ID: 24969409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Marginal adaptation and CAD-CAM technology: A systematic review of restorative material and fabrication techniques.
Papadiochou S; Pissiotis AL
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Apr; 119(4):545-551. PubMed ID: 28967399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. 3D and 2D marginal fit of pressed and CAD/CAM lithium disilicate crowns made from digital and conventional impressions.
Anadioti E; Aquilino SA; Gratton DG; Holloway JA; Denry I; Thomas GW; Qian F
J Prosthodont; 2014 Dec; 23(8):610-7. PubMed ID: 24995593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
