303 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27538900)
1. Validity and reliability of quality of recovery-35 Thai version: a prospective questionnaire-based study.
Pitimana-Aree S; Udompanthurak S; Lapmahapaisan S; Tareerath M; Wangdee A
BMC Anesthesiol; 2016 Aug; 16(1):64. PubMed ID: 27538900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Validation of the translated Quality of Recovery-15 questionnaire in a French-speaking population.
Demumieux F; Ludes PO; Diemunsch P; Bennett-Guerrero E; Lujic M; Lefebvre F; Noll E
Br J Anaesth; 2020 Jun; 124(6):761-767. PubMed ID: 32303379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Validity and reliability of the Korean version of the Quality of Recovery-40 questionnaire.
Lee JH; Kim D; Seo D; Son JS; Kim DC
Korean J Anesthesiol; 2018 Dec; 71(6):467-475. PubMed ID: 29684992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Validation of the Chinese Version of the Quality of Recovery-15 Score and Its Comparison with the Post-Operative Quality Recovery Scale.
Bu XS; Zhang J; Zuo YX
Patient; 2016 Jun; 9(3):251-9. PubMed ID: 26518201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Translation and validation of the Danish version of the postoperative quality of recovery score QoR-15.
Kleif J; Edwards HM; Sort R; Vilandt J; Gögenur I
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2015 Aug; 59(7):912-20. PubMed ID: 25867135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Validity and reliability of a postoperative quality of recovery score: the QoR-40.
Myles PS; Weitkamp B; Jones K; Melick J; Hensen S
Br J Anaesth; 2000 Jan; 84(1):11-5. PubMed ID: 10740540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Variability and reliability of the French version of the Quality of Recovery-40 Questionnaire (QoR-40).
Vignaud M; Morel C; Henault A; Futier E; Pereira B; Lambert C; Beloeil H
Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med; 2021 Apr; 40(2):100822. PubMed ID: 33722740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Psychometric testing of the Chinese quality of recovery score.
Chan MT; Lo CC; Lok CK; Chan TW; Choi KC; Gin T
Anesth Analg; 2008 Oct; 107(4):1189-95. PubMed ID: 18806027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Validation and clinical utility of the Korean version of the Quality of Recovery-15 with enhanced recovery after surgery: a prospective observational cohort study.
Yoon S; Joo H; Oh YM; Lee J; Bahk JH; Lee HJ
Br J Anaesth; 2020 Oct; 125(4):614-621. PubMed ID: 32703550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Validity and reliability of the Korean version of the Quality of Recovery-15 questionnaire.
Lee JH; Ki M; Choi S; Woo CJ; Kim D; Lim H; Kim DC
Korean J Anesthesiol; 2021 Apr; 74(2):142-149. PubMed ID: 33121227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Validity and reliability of Thai version of the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score in patients with arthritis of the foot and ankle.
Angthong C
Foot Ankle Surg; 2016 Dec; 22(4):224-228. PubMed ID: 27810018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Hindi translation and cultural adaptation of the quality of recovery score-40 (QoR-40 score): A validation study.
Govil N; Rathore R; Tiwari A; Garg PK; Parag K; Mishra P
Indian J Anaesth; 2024 Jun; 68(6):533-539. PubMed ID: 38903262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Development and psychometric evaluation of a postoperative quality of recovery score: the QoR-15.
Stark PA; Myles PS; Burke JA
Anesthesiology; 2013 Jun; 118(6):1332-40. PubMed ID: 23411725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Translation and Validation of the Korean Version of the Postoperative Quality of Recovery Score QoR-15.
Kim D; Kim JK; Yeo J
Biomed Res Int; 2020; 2020():3456234. PubMed ID: 33123568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Validation of the Japanese version of the quality of recovery score QoR-40.
Tanaka Y; Wakita T; Fukuhara S; Nishiwada M; Inoue S; Kawaguchi M; Furuya H
J Anesth; 2011 Aug; 25(4):509-15. PubMed ID: 21626452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Validation of the Dutch translation of the quality of recovery-15 scale.
de Vlieger JCN; Luiting WH; Lockyer J; Meyer P; Fleer J; Sanderman R; Wietasch JKG
BMC Anesthesiol; 2022 Aug; 22(1):243. PubMed ID: 35915438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Development and psychometric testing of a quality of recovery score after general anesthesia and surgery in adults.
Myles PS; Hunt JO; Nightingale CE; Fletcher H; Beh T; Tanil D; Nagy A; Rubinstein A; Ponsford JL
Anesth Analg; 1999 Jan; 88(1):83-90. PubMed ID: 9895071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Patient evaluation of postoperative recovery. An evaluation of the QoR scores in 577 patients].
Eberhart LH; Greiner S; Geldner G; Wulf H
Anaesthesist; 2002 Jun; 51(6):463-6. PubMed ID: 12391532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Development and validation of Arabic version of the postoperative quality of recovery-40 questionnaire.
Terkawi AS; Myles PS; Riad W; Nassar SN; Mahmoud M; AlKahtani GJ; Sala FJ; Abdulrahman A; Doais KS; Terkawi RS; Tsang S
Saudi J Anaesth; 2017 May; 11(Suppl 1):S40-S52. PubMed ID: 28616003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quality of recovery after anaesthesia measured with QoR-40: a prospective observational study.
Guimarães-Pereira L; Costa M; Sousa G; Abelha F
Braz J Anesthesiol; 2016; 66(4):369-75. PubMed ID: 27343786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
